Literature DB >> 28885510

Pylorus Resection Does Not Reduce Delayed Gastric Emptying After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (PROPP Study, DRKS00004191).

Thilo Hackert1, Pascal Probst1,2, Phillip Knebel1,2, Colette Doerr-Harim1,2, Thomas Bruckner3, Ulla Klaiber1, Jens Werner4, Lutz Schneider1, Christoph W Michalski1, Oliver Strobel1, Alexis Ulrich1, Markus K Diener1,2, Markus W Büchler1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pylorus resection on postoperative delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
BACKGROUND: PD is the standard treatment for tumors of the pancreatic head. Preservation of the pylorus has been widely accepted as standard procedure. DGE is a common complication causing impaired oral intake, prolonged hospital stay, and postponed further treatment. Recently, pylorus resection has been shown to reduce DGE.
METHODS: Patients undergoing PD for any indication at the University of Heidelberg were randomized to either PD with pylorus preservation (PP) or PD with pylorus resection and complete stomach preservation (PR). The primary endpoint was DGE within 30 days according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition.
RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were randomized to PP and 93 patients to PR. There were no baseline imbalances between the groups. Overall, 53 of 188 patients (28.2%) developed a DGE (grade: A 15.5%; B 8.8%; C 3.3%). In the PP group 24 of 95 patients (25.3%) and in the PR group 29 of 93 patients (31.2%) developed DGE (odds ratio 1.534, 95% confidence interval 0.788 to 2.987; P = 0.208). Higher BMI, indigestion, and intraabdominal major complications were significant risk factors for DGE.
CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, pylorus resection during PD did not reduce the incidence or severity of DGE. The development of DGE seems to be multifactorial rather than attributable to pyloric dysfunction alone. Pylorus preservation should therefore remain the standard of care in PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00004191.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28885510     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Is systematic nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy really necessary?

Authors:  Elodie Gaignard; Damien Bergeat; Laetitia Courtin-Tanguy; Michel Rayar; Aude Merdrignac; Fabien Robin; Karim Boudjema; Helene Beloeil; Bernard Meunier; Laurent Sulpice
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Felix J Hüttner; Thomas Bruckner; Oliver Strobel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Pylorus preservation pancreatectomy or not.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-04

4.  Clinical Efficacy of the Preservation of the Hepatic Branch of the Vagus Nerve on Delayed Gastric Emptying After Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xu Li; Tingting Qin; Feng Zhu; Min Wang; Chao Dang; Li He; Shutao Pan; Yuhui Liu; Taoyuan Yin; Yecheng Feng; Xin Wang; Yahong Yu; Ming Shen; Xingpei Lu; Yongjun Chen; Li Jiang; Chenjian Shi; Renyi Qin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Impact of pylorus preservation on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy-analysis of 5,000 patients based on the German StuDoQ|Pancreas-Registry.

Authors:  Tim Fahlbusch; Andreas Minh Luu; Philipp Höhn; Carsten Klinger; Jens Werner; Tobias Keck; Helmut Friess; Jörg Köninger; Thomas Kraus; Guido Alsfasser; Winfried Padberg; Jörg Peter Ritz; Waldemar Uhl; Orlin Belyaev
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

Review 6.  Antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Felix J Hüttner; Rosa Klotz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Pascal Probst; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

7.  Nasogastric Decompression vs No Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Randomized Clinical IPOD Trial.

Authors:  Damien Bergeat; Aude Merdrignac; Fabien Robin; Elodie Gaignard; Michel Rayar; Bernard Meunier; Hélène Beloeil; Karim Boudjema; Bruno Laviolle; Laurent Sulpice
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Impact of gastric resection and enteric anastomotic configuration on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  C Varghese; S Bhat; T H-H Wang; G O'Grady; S Pandanaboyana
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Francesca Lombardo; Gianluca Bonitta; Piergiorgio Danelli; Davide Bona
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-12-14

10.  Gastrointestinal Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy With Epidural vs Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rosa Klotz; Jan Larmann; Christina Klose; Thomas Bruckner; Laura Benner; Colette Doerr-Harim; Solveig Tenckhoff; Johan F Lock; Elmar-Marc Brede; Roberto Salvia; Enrico Polati; Jörg Köninger; Jan-Henrik Schiff; Uwe A Wittel; Alexander Hötzel; Tobias Keck; Carla Nau; Anca-Laura Amati; Christian Koch; Thomas Eberl; Michael Zink; Ales Tomazic; Vesna Novak-Jankovic; Stefan Hofer; Markus K Diener; Markus A Weigand; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.