Literature DB >> 28885426

The Evolution of and Evidence for Opportunistic Salpingectomy.

Sarah E Dilley1, J Michael Straughn, Charles A Leath.   

Abstract

In the absence of significant benefit from either novel therapeutics or screening, the focus of decreasing ovarian cancer incidence and mortality has shifted toward primary prevention. Histopathologic data have demonstrated that up to 70% of ovarian cancers may actually arise from the fallopian tube. This has led to the increased adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy as a tool for ovarian cancer prevention. In turn, the potential surgical risks and ovarian cancer prevention of this emerging practice have generated multiple studies. In this comprehensive review, we address the origins of ovarian cancer, the historical context and recent trends of tubal surgery, the existing population-based data on ovarian cancer risk reduction, and provide a detailed review of the evidence on surgical risks of salpingectomy. To date, the safety and ovarian cancer risk reduction evidence sheds a positive light on opportunistic salpingectomy. Although research on this subject has grown substantially in recent years, there remains a paucity of large, prospective studies that examine clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885426     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Christina T Blanchard; Britt K Erickson; Jeff Szychowski; Charles A Leath; Joseph R Biggio; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Brett D Einerson; Christina T Blanchard; Britt K Erickson; Jeff Szychowski; Charles A Leath; Joseph R Biggio; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristiana Lehn; Linda Gu; Mitchell D Creinin; Melissa J Chen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Factors influencing decision-making around opportunistic salpingectomy: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Miranda P Steenbeek; Laura A M van Lieshout; Johanna W M Aarts; Jurgen M J Piek; Sjors F P J Coppus; Leon F A G Massuger; Rosella P M G Hermens; Joanne A de Hullu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Ovarian Cancer Previvors: How to manage these patients?

Authors:  Jesus Paula Carvalho; Edmund Chada Baracat; Filomena Marino Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Prophylactic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Tomasch; M Lemmerer; S Oswald; S Uranitsch; C Schauer; A-M Schütz; B Bliem; A Berger; P F J Lang; G Rosanelli; F Ronaghi; J Tschmelitsch; S F Lax; S Uranues; K Tamussino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study.

Authors:  Sue Ross; Douglas Lier; Goldie Mackinnon; Christine Bentz; Gloria Rakowski; Valerie A Capstick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.