Literature DB >> 28885409

A Plea for MERSQI: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.

Roger P Smith1, Lee A Learman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the quality of educational scholarship presented at a large national conference of obstetrics and gynecology educators.
METHODS: We reviewed Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology-Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics annual meeting abstracts from 2015 and 2016, published as supplements to Obstetrics & Gynecology. For this uncontrolled observational study, abstracts were reviewed and scored using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Comparisons between types of submissions (oral presentations or posters), origin of the report (academic or community), setting (undergraduate, graduate, postgraduate), and focus of the study (tool development or evaluation) were made. Abstracts from award-winning presentations and full manuscripts were compared with the remaining abstracts. One- and two-tailed Student t tests with a two-sample unequal variance (heteroscedastic) test were performed with a significance threshold of P≤.05.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six abstracts and articles were available, with 101 posters and 77 oral presentations that could be scored in all six of the MERSQI domains. The average MERSQI score was 9.05 (±1.90) with scores ranging from 5 to 13.5 (median 9). Abstracts from full-text articles scored more than 1 point higher than other abstracts (10.2 compared with 9.0, P<.001, Cohen's d=0.72). Statistically significant smaller magnitude differences were found comparing tool development with evaluation, academic with community studies, and for award with nonaward winners. No differences were found comparing oral and poster presentations.
CONCLUSION: The quality of educational scholarship presented at a national meeting of obstetrics and gynecology educators falls within the published range for other specialties. The MERSQI scoring system is a useful method for tracking and benchmarking the quality of medical education scholarship in obstetrics and gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885409     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.

Authors:  H K James; A W Chapman; G T R Pattison; D R Griffin; J D Fisher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The Quality Of Evidence In Preclinical Medical Education Literature: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marilyn Leif; Natali Semarad; Vaishnavi Ganesan; Kevin Selting; Justin Burr; Austin Svec; Peggy Clements; Geoffrey Talmon
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-11-01

Review 3.  Evaluation of simulation models in neurosurgical training according to face, content, and construct validity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shreya Chawla; Sharmila Devi; Paola Calvachi; William B Gormley; Roberto Rueda-Esteban
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  Teaching emergency ultrasound to emergency medicine residents: a scoping review of structured training methods.

Authors:  Leila L PoSaw; Brandon M Wubben; Nicholas Bertucci; Gregory A Bell; Heather Healy; Sangil Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-06-14

5.  Community Based Interventions for Problematic Substance Use in Later Life: A Systematic Review of Evaluated Studies and Their Outcomes.

Authors:  Trish Hafford-Letchfield; Tricia McQuarrie; Carmel Clancy; Betsy Thom; Briony Jain
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  The innate aptitude's effect on the surgical task performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael El Boghdady; Beatrice Marianne Ewalds-Kvist
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.