Literature DB >> 28885067

Differential gene expression in primary fibroblasts induced by proton and cobalt-60 beam irradiation.

Steffen Nielsen1, Niels Bassler2, Leszek Grzanka3, Jan Swakon3, Pawel Olko3, Christian Nicolaj Andreassen1, Jens Overgaard1, Jan Alsner1, Brita Singers Sørensen1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proton beam therapy delivers a more conformal dose distribution than conventional radiotherapy, thus improving normal tissue sparring. Increasing linear energy transfer (LET) along the proton track increases the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) near the distal edge of the Spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). The severity of normal tissue side effects following photon beam radiotherapy vary considerably between patients. AIM: The dual study aim was to identify gene expression patterns specific to radiation type and proton beam position, and to assess whether individual radiation sensitivity influences gene expression levels in fibroblast cultures irradiated in vitro.
METHODS: The study includes 30 primary fibroblast cell cultures from patients previously classified as either radiosensitive or radioresistant. Cells were irradiated at three different positions in the proton beam profile: entrance, mid-SOBP and at the SOBP distal edge. Dose was delivered in three fractions × 3.5 Gy(RBE) (RBE 1.1). Cobalt-60 (Co-60) irradiation was used as reference. Real-time qPCR was performed to determine gene expression levels for 17 genes associated with inflammation response, fibrosis and angiogenesis.
RESULTS: Differences in median gene expression levels were observed for multiple genes such as IL6, IL8 and CXCL12. Median IL6 expression was 30%, 24% and 47% lower in entrance, mid-SOBP and SOBP distal edge groups than in Co-60 irradiated cells. No genes were found to be oppositely regulated by different radiation qualities. Radiosensitive patient samples had the strongest regulation of gene expression; irrespective of radiation type.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the increased LET at the SOBP distal edge position did not generally lead to increased transcriptive response in primary fibroblast cultures. Inflammatory factors were generally less extensively upregulated by proton irradiation compared with Co-60 photon irradiation. These effects may possibly influence the development of normal tissue damage in patients treated with proton beam therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885067     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1351623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comparing Photon and Charged Particle Therapy Using DNA Damage Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shayoni Ray; Egle Cekanaviciute; Ivan Paulino Lima; Brita Singers Sørensen; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 2.  Combined Treatment Modalities for High-Energy Proton Irradiation: Exploiting Specific DNA Repair Dependencies.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Gene Expression Studies for the Development of Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 4.  The relative biological effectiveness of proton irradiation in dependence of DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Erica Faccin; Tamara Kazimova; Philip A Knobel; Irma Telarovic; Fabienne Tschanz; Verena Waller; Rona Winkler; Carmen Yong; Dario Zingariello; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

6.  Optimal reference genes for normalization of qPCR gene expression data from proton and photon irradiated dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Steffen Nielsen; Niels Bassler; Leszek Grzanka; Jan Swakon; Pawel Olko; Christian Nicolaj Andreassen; Jan Alsner; Brita Singers Sørensen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.