| Literature DB >> 28884962 |
Yukio Iwashita1, Taizo Hibi2, Tetsuji Ohyama3, Akiko Umezawa4, Tadahiro Takada5, Steven M Strasberg6, Horacio J Asbun7, Henry A Pitt8, Ho-Seong Han9, Tsann-Long Hwang10, Kenji Suzuki11, Yoo-Seok Yoon9, In-Seok Choi12, Dong-Sup Yoon13, Wayne Shih-Wei Huang14, Masahiro Yoshida15, Go Wakabayashi16, Fumihiko Miura5, Kohji Okamoto17, Itaru Endo18, Eduardo de Santibañes19, Mariano Eduardo Giménez20, John A Windsor21, O James Garden22, Dirk J Gouma23, Daniel Cherqui24, Giulio Belli25, Christos Dervenis26, Daniel J Deziel27, Eduard Jonas28, Palepu Jagannath29, Avinash Nivritti Supe30, Harjit Singh31, Kui-Hin Liau31, Xiao-Ping Chen31, Angus C W Chan32, Wan Yee Lau33, Sheung Tat Fan34, Miin-Fu Chen9, Myung-Hwan Kim35, Goro Honda36, Atsushi Sugioka37, Koji Asai38, Keita Wada5, Yasuhisa Mori39, Ryota Higuchi40, Takeyuki Misawa41, Manabu Watanabe38, Naoki Matsumura42, Toshiki Rikiyama43, Naohiro Sata44, Nobuyasu Kano45, Hiromi Tokumura42, Taizo Kimura11, Seigo Kitano46, Masafumi Inomata1, Koichi Hirata47, Yoshinobu Sumiyama48, Kazuo Inui49, Masakazu Yamamoto40.
Abstract
Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a serious iatrogenic surgical complication. BDI most often occurs as a result of misidentification of the anatomy; however, clinical evidence on its precise mechanism and surgeons' perceptions is scarce. Surgeons from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the USA, etc. (n = 614) participated in a questionnaire regarding their BDI experience and near-misses; and perceptions on landmarks, intraoperative findings, and surgical techniques. Respondents voted for a Delphi process and graded each item on a five-point scale. The consensus was built when ≥80% of overall responses were 4 or 5. Response rates for the first- and second-round Delphi were 60.6% and 74.9%, respectively. Misidentification of local anatomy accounted for 76.2% of BDI. Final consensus was reached on: (1) Effective retraction of the gallbladder, (2) Always obtaining critical view of safety, and (3) Avoiding excessive use of electrocautery/clipping as vital procedures; and (4) Calot's triangle area and (5) Critical view of safety as important landmarks. For (6) Impacted gallstone and (7) Severe fibrosis/scarring in Calot's triangle, bail-out procedures may be indicated. A consensus was reached among expert surgeons on relevant landmarks and intraoperative findings and appropriate surgical techniques to avoid BDI.Entities:
Keywords: Bile duct injury; Critical view of safety; Delphi consensus; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical difficulty
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28884962 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ISSN: 1868-6974 Impact factor: 7.027