| Literature DB >> 28884706 |
Stella Genitsari1, Eftichia Stiakaki1, Chryssoula Perdikogianni2, Georgia Martimianaki3, Iordanis Pelagiadis4, Margarita Pesmatzoglou1, Maria Kalmanti5, Helen Dimitriou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have a supportive role in hematopoiesis and as components of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment may present alterations during acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and be affected by chemotherapeutic agents. We examined the biological and functional characteristics of MSCs in ALL diagnosis and treatment and their effect on MSC qualitative properties.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow microenvironment; Childhood leukemia; Mesenchymal stromal cells Stromal cell-derived factor 1α.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28884706 PMCID: PMC5843770 DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Haematol ISSN: 1300-7777 Impact factor: 1.831
Figure 1Days required for mesenchymal stromal cells in the mononuclear cells fraction (d0) to reach confluency. The doubling time at diagnosis differs from that of the phases of chemotherapy (p: d15=0.042, d33=0.007, consol=0.001, maint=0.022, end=0.002) and of the control (p=0.011). This defect subsides with the progression of culture (*: ss in comparison to the d group).
Doubling time of mesenchymal stromal cells of all groups in the different passages (P1-P5).
Figure 2Colony forming units-fibroblast development of mesenchymal stromal cells in the mononuclear cells fraction (d0) from all studied groups. The number of colonies at diagnosis is lower than that of the other groups (d vs. end, control: p<0.0001). Culture progression resulted in lower colony development, becoming significant at the later passages. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (*: p<0.05 compared to diagnosis). CFU-F: Colony forming units.
Colony forming units-fibroblast development of mesenchymal stromal cells from all studied groups (P1-P5).
Supplementary Figure 1Colony forming units-fibroblast (CFU-F) colonies of large (L), medium (M), and small (S) size at the initial (P1) and last (P5) passages of the study. Larger colonies prevail at early passages while at the later ones the CFU-F population consists of mainly small colonies.
Figure 3Analysis of the cell-cycle phases. Most of the mesenchymal stromal cells are in quiescence as the highest percentage of cells are in the G0G1 phase. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Spontaneous apoptosis, evaluated by flow cytometry after 7-amino-actinomycin D staining of mesenchymal stromal cells at diagnosis and during treatment at passages 2 and 4 (P2, P4).
Figure 4The stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) and angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) expressions by both mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and mononuclear cells (MNCs) at diagnosis and treatment. Stromal cells secrete higher amounts of both these factors. A) Variability in their expression was noticed at diagnosis, which became more uniform in treatment phases. B) No difference in angiopoietin-1 levels between diagnosis and treatment groups. MSC: Mesenchymal stromal cell, MNC: mononuclear cell, Ang-1: angiopoietin-1, SDF-1α: stromal cell-derived factor-1α.