Literature DB >> 28884610

Performance of Current Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Tools in Patients With Gastric Cancer and Validity After First Treatment.

Harry E Fuentes1, L H Paz1, Y Wang1, D M Oramas2, C R Simons1, A J Tafur3.   

Abstract

Patients with gastric cancer (GC) are at higher risk of thromboembolism when compared to other solid tumors. We aim to determine the predictive performance of current venous thromboembolism (VTE) predictive tools and their variability and validity after first treatment. Single institution cohort of GC-treated patients (2010*15). We abstracted predictive tools, validated for VTE prediction in patient with cancer; including the Khorana Score (KRS), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The primary outcome was CAT prediction. We included 112 patients who were predominantly men (66%), 58 (51-64)-year-olds, with adenocarcinoma (84%) and advanced disease (59%). The median follow-up was 21.3 months (9.5-42.6). The VTE occurrence was 12%. The median time from diagnosis to VTE occurrence was 59 days (36-258). In our cohort, performance status (PS; hazard ratio [HR], 8.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.37-27.14; P < .01) was an independent predictor of VTE whereas KRS (univariate HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.7-7.4; P = .17), PLR (univariate HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.2-3.1; P = .8), and NLR (univariate HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-2.5; P = .8) at baseline were not associated with VTE risk. The posttreatment KRS was an independent predictor of VTE (HR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.17-11.65; P = .25) along with PS (HR, 7.58; 95% CI, 2.27-25.33; P = .01). Posttreatment KRS appears as a valid tool to identify patients with GC at high risk of VTE after first cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Khorana Score; cancer-associated thrombosis; gastric cancer; risk assessment model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28884610      PMCID: PMC6714876          DOI: 10.1177/1076029617726599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 1076-0296            Impact factor:   2.389


  37 in total

1.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with cancer.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Afzal Beemath; Frederick A Meyers; Elias Skaf; Julia Sanchez; Ronald E Olson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  J A Heit; M D Silverstein; D N Mohr; T M Petterson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-27

3.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers.

Authors:  Helen K Chew; Theodore Wun; Danielle Harvey; Hong Zhou; Richard H White
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-27

4.  Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data.

Authors:  N Levitan; A Dowlati; S C Remick; H I Tahsildar; L D Sivinski; R Beyth; A A Rimm
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Prospective evaluation of major vascular events in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine.

Authors:  Gianmauro Numico; Ornella Garrone; Vincenzo Dongiovanni; Nicola Silvestris; Ida Colantonio; Gianna Di Costanzo; Cristina Granetto; Marcella Occelli; Elena Fea; Abdelamid Heouaine; Milena Gasco; Marco Merlano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeanet W Blom; Carine J M Doggen; Susanne Osanto; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Sergei Tjulandin; Alejandro Majlis; Manuel Constenla; Corrado Boni; Adriano Rodrigues; Miguel Fodor; Yee Chao; Edouard Voznyi; Marie-Laure Risse; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma are associated with an increased incidence of venothromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Gordan Srkalovic; Marte G Cameron; Lisa Rybicki; Steven R Deitcher; Kandice Kattke-Marchant; Mohamad A Hussein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  The prothrombotic state in cancer: pathogenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Marcello De Cicco
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study.

Authors:  J W Blom; J P M Vanderschoot; M J Oostindiër; S Osanto; F J M van der Meer; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.824

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and biomarkers of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Authors:  Ann S Kim; Alok A Khorana; Keith R McCrae
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 7.012

2.  Biomarkers of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence after Discontinuation of Low Molecular Weight Heparin Treatment for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (HISPALIS-Study).

Authors:  Remedios Otero; Aurora Solier-López; Verónica Sánchez-López; Julia Oto; Elena Arellano; Samira Marín; Luis Jara-Palomares; Teresa Elías; María Isabel Asencio; Isabel Blasco-Esquivias; María Rodríguez de la Borbolla; José María Sánchez-Díaz; Macarena Real-Domínguez; Emilio García-Cabrera; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Martorell; Pilar Medina
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Novel Aspects of Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.

Authors:  Vitor H Almeida; Araci M R Rondon; Tainá Gomes; Robson Q Monteiro
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  MicroRNAs and Neutrophil Activation Markers Predict Venous Thrombosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Distal Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Julia Oto; Silvia Navarro; Anders C Larsen; María José Solmoirago; Emma Plana; David Hervás; Álvaro Fernández-Pardo; Francisco España; Søren R Kristensen; Ole Thorlacius-Ussing; Pilar Medina
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Prediction models for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory adults with pancreatic and gastro-oesophageal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Asma Zaheer; Nenad Naumovski; Kellie Toohey; Theophile Niyonsenga; Desmond Yip; Nicholas Brown; Reza Mortazavi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Paraneoplastic Thromboembolism and Thrombophilia: Significance in Visceral Medicine.

Authors:  Christian Pfrepper
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-07-15

7.  Patterns and predictors of thromboembolic events among patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Rawan Mustafa; Baha' Sharaf; Abdallah Al-Tell; Dina Braik; Khaled Ashouri; Zaid Omari; Razan Mansour; Jamil Qarqash; Hanin Shaqboua; Saba Jaradat; Kholoud Al-Qasem; Rayan Bater
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.