Literature DB >> 28884589

Is there a role for modified probiotics as beneficial microbes: a systematic review of the literature.

L Zorzela1,2, S K Ardestani1,2, L V McFarland3, S Vohra1,2.   

Abstract

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of modified (heat-killed or sonicated) probiotics for the efficacy and safety to prevent and treat various diseases. Recent clinical research has focused on living strains of probiotics, but use in high-risk patients and potential adverse reactions including bacteremia has focused interest on alternatives to the use of live probiotics. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Alt Health Watch, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, from inception to February 14, 2017 for randomised controlled trials involving modified probiotic strains. The primary outcome was efficacy to prevent or treat disease and the secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events. A total of 40 trials were included (n=3,913): 14 trials (15 arms with modified probiotics and 20 control arms) for the prevention of diseases and 26 trials (29 arms with modified probiotics and 32 control arms) for treatment of various diseases. Modified microbes were compared to either placebo (44%), or the same living probiotic strain (39%) or to only standard therapies (17%). Modified microbes were not significantly more or less effective than the living probiotic in 86% of the preventive trials and 69% of the treatment trials. Modified probiotic strains were significantly more effective in 15% of the treatment trials. Incidence rates of adverse events were similar for modified and living probiotics and other control groups, but many trials did not collect adequate safety data. Although several types of modified probiotics showed significant efficacy over living strains of probiotics, firm conclusions could not be reached due to the limited number of trials using the same type of modified microbe (strain, daily dose and duration) for a specific disease indication. Further research may illuminate other strains of modified probiotics that may have potential as clinical biotherapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult disease; allergy; cancer; dead microbes; diarrhoea; living probiotics; paediatric disease; weight loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28884589     DOI: 10.3920/BM2017.0032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  15 in total

Review 1.  Nutraceuticals as modulators of gut microbiota: Role in therapy.

Authors:  Eamonn M M Quigley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Necrotizing Enterocolitis Research: Strategies for Implementation in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Mohan Pammi; Isabelle G De Plaen; Akhil Maheshwari
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 3.  Nutritional Supplements to Improve Outcomes in Preterm Neonates.

Authors:  Mohan Pammi; Ravi M Patel
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.642

Review 4.  International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics.

Authors:  Ralf Jäger; Alex E Mohr; Katie C Carpenter; Chad M Kerksick; Martin Purpura; Adel Moussa; Jeremy R Townsend; Manfred Lamprecht; Nicholas P West; Katherine Black; Michael Gleeson; David B Pyne; Shawn D Wells; Shawn M Arent; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Richard B Kreider; Bill I Campbell; Laurent Bannock; Jonathan Scheiman; Craig J Wissent; Marco Pane; Douglas S Kalman; Jamie N Pugh; Jessica A Ter Haar; Jose Antonio
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Para-probiotics for Preterm Neonates-The Next Frontier.

Authors:  Girish Deshpande; Gayatri Athalye-Jape; Sanjay Patole
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Surveys of parents and clinicians concerning the minimally important difference of probiotic therapy for prevention of paediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhoea.

Authors:  Samaneh Khanpour Ardestani; Joan L Robinson; Levinus A Dieleman; Hien Q Huynh; Hsing Jou; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Effect of heat-killed Streptococcus thermophilus on type 2 diabetes rats.

Authors:  Xiangyang Gao; Fei Wang; Peng Zhao; Rong Zhang; Qiang Zeng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Effects of daily consumption of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145 on anthropometric adiposity biomarkers in abdominally obese subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Pedret; Rosa M Valls; Lorena Calderón-Pérez; Elisabet Llauradó; Judit Companys; Laura Pla-Pagà; Ana Moragas; Francisco Martín-Luján; Yolanda Ortega; Montse Giralt; Antoni Caimari; Empar Chenoll; Salvador Genovés; Patricia Martorell; Francisco M Codoñer; Daniel Ramón; Lluís Arola; Rosa Solà
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 9.  Postbiotic Supplementation for Children and Newborn's Health.

Authors:  Daniela Morniroli; Giulia Vizzari; Alessandra Consales; Fabio Mosca; Maria Lorella Giannì
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Filling the Gaps: Current Research Directions for a Rational Use of Probiotics in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Arianna Aceti; Isadora Beghetti; Luca Maggio; Silvia Martini; Giacomo Faldella; Luigi Corvaglia
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.