Literature DB >> 28884520

Relative pressure estimation from velocity measurements in blood flows: State-of-the-art and new approaches.

Cristóbal Bertoglio1,2, Rodolfo Nuñez1, Felipe Galarce1,3, David Nordsletten4, Axel Osses1.   

Abstract

The relative pressure difference across stenotic blood vessels serves as an important clinical index for the diagnosis of many cardiovascular diseases. While the clinical gold standard for relative pressure difference measurements is invasive catheterization, Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging has emerged as a promising tool for enabling a noninvasive quantification, by linking highly spatially resolved velocity measurements with relative pressures via the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. In this work, we provide a review and analysis of current methods for relative pressure estimation and propose 3 additional techniques. Methods are compared using synthetic data from numerical examples, and sensitivity to subsampling and noise was explored. Through our analysis, we verify that the newly proposed approaches are more robust with respect to spatial subsampling and less sensitive to noise and therefore provide improved means for estimating relative pressure differences noninvasively.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Navier-Stokes equations; blood flows; phase-contrast MRI; relative pressure estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28884520     DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  4 in total

1.  Estimation of Cardiovascular Relative Pressure Using Virtual Work-Energy.

Authors:  David Marlevi; Bram Ruijsink; Maximilian Balmus; Desmond Dillon-Murphy; Daniel Fovargue; Kuberan Pushparajah; Cristóbal Bertoglio; Massimiliano Colarieti-Tosti; Matilda Larsson; Pablo Lamata; C Alberto Figueroa; Reza Razavi; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Reducing the impact of geometric errors in flow computations using velocity measurements.

Authors:  David Nolte; Cristóbal Bertoglio
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 3.  Inverse problems in blood flow modeling: A review.

Authors:  David Nolte; Cristóbal Bertoglio
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.648

4.  On the numerical treatment of viscous and convective effects in relative pressure reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Douglas R Q Pacheco
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.648

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.