| Literature DB >> 28884130 |
M K Daud1,2, Muhammad Nafees3, Shafaqat Ali4, Muhammad Rizwan4, Raees Ahmad Bajwa3, Muhammad Bilal Shakoor3, Muhammad Umair Arshad5, Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha6, Farah Deeba2, Waheed Murad7, Ijaz Malook2, Shui Jin Zhu1.
Abstract
Due to alarming increase in population and rapid industrialization, drinking water quality is being deteriorated day by day in Pakistan. This review sums up the outcomes of various research studies conducted for drinking water quality status of different areas of Pakistan by taking into account the physicochemical properties of drinking water as well as the presence of various pathogenic microorganisms. About 20% of the whole population of Pakistan has access to safe drinking water. The remaining 80% of population is forced to use unsafe drinking water due to the scarcity of safe and healthy drinking water sources. The primary source of contamination is sewerage (fecal) which is extensively discharged into drinking water system supplies. Secondary source of pollution is the disposal of toxic chemicals from industrial effluents, pesticides, and fertilizers from agriculture sources into the water bodies. Anthropogenic activities cause waterborne diseases that constitute about 80% of all diseases and are responsible for 33% of deaths. This review highlights the drinking water quality, contamination sources, sanitation situation, and effects of unsafe drinking water on humans. There is immediate need to take protective measures and treatment technologies to overcome unhygienic condition of drinking water supplies in different areas of Pakistan.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28884130 PMCID: PMC5573092 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7908183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Per capita water availability decreasing tremendously in Pakistan.
Figure 2Dependence of water supply in the provinces of Pakistan.
National Standards for Drinking Water Quality.
| Parameters | Standard values for Pakistan | WHO standards |
|---|---|---|
| Biological | ||
|
| ||
| All water intended for drinking ( | Must not be detectable in any 100 mL sample | Must not be detectable in any 100 mL sample |
| Treated water entering the distribution system ( | Must not be detectable in any 100 mL sample | Must not be detectable in any 100 mL sample |
| Treated water in the distribution system ( | Must not be detectable in any 100 mL sample | Must not be detectable in any 100 mL sample |
|
| ||
| Physical | ||
|
| ||
| Color | ≤15 TCU | ≤15 TCU |
| Taste | None | None |
| Odor | None | None |
| Turbidity | <5 NTU | <5 NTU |
| Total hardness as CaCO3 | <500 mg/L | — |
| TDS | <1000 | <1000 |
| pH | 6.5–8.5 | 6.5–8.5 |
|
| ||
| Chemical | ||
|
| ||
| Essential inorganic | mg/L | mg/L |
|
| ||
| Aluminum (Al) mg/L | ≤0.2 | 0.2 |
| Antimony (Sb) | ≤0.005 (P) | 0.02 |
|
| ||
| Arsenic (As) | ≤0.05 (P) | 0.01 |
| Barium (Ba) | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Boron (B) | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Cadmium (Cd) | 0.01 | 0.003 |
| Chloride (Cl) | <250 | 250 |
| Chromium (Cr) | ≤0.05 | 0.05 |
| Copper (Cu) | 2 | 2 |
|
| ||
| Toxic inorganic | mg/L | mg/L |
|
| ||
| Cyanide (CN) | ≤0.05 | 0.07 |
| Fluoride (F) | ≤1.5 | 1.5 |
| Lead (Pb) | ≤0.05 | 0.01 |
| Manganese (Mn) | ≤0.5 | 0.5 |
| Mercury (Hg) | ≤0.001 | 0.001 |
| Nickel (Ni) | ≤0.02 | 0.02 |
| Nitrate (NO3) | ≤50 | 50 |
| Nitrite (NO2) | ≤3 (P) | 3 |
| Selenium (Se) | 0.01 (P) | 0.01 |
| Residual chlorine | 0.2–0.5 at consumer end, 0.5–1.5 at source | — |
| Zinc (Zn) | 5.0 | 3 |
|
| ||
| Organic | ||
|
| ||
| Phenolic compounds (phenols) mg/L | ≤0.002 | |
| Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) g/L | 0.01 (by GC/MS method) | |
∗ indicates priority health related inorganic constituents which need regular monitoring.
Physicochemical and biological parameters of drinking water quality of twin cities.
| Islamabad and Rawalpindi | Total | Percentage of samples contaminated | References | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | EC | TDS | Turbidity | Hardness | Physicochemical | Total coliform | Fecal coliform |
| Bacteriological values | |||
| Islamabad (Isd.) | 271 | — | — | — | — | — | 10.3 | — | — | — | 77 | [ |
| CDA (Isd.) | 196 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.6 | — | — | — | 5.1 | [ |
| F-10, G-6, G-10, H-9, I-9, Dhok Kala khan, commercial market, New Mirpur, Pindora, Dhoke Ratta | 10a | — | — | 4a | — | 4a | — | Present | Present | Present | — | [ |
| Islamabad & Rawalpindi | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | 46 | — | — | — | — | [ |
| Islamabad & Rawalpindi | 130 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Present | Present | Present | — | [ |
| Islamabad | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | 14.5 | Present | Present | Present | — | [ |
| Islamabad | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Present | Present | Present | — | [ |
aNumber of sampling areas.
Physicochemical and biological parameters of drinking water quality of Punjab.
| Punjab | Total | Percentage of samples contaminated | References | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | EC | TDS | Turbidity | Hardness | Physicochemical | Total coliform | Fecal coliform |
| Bacteriological values | |||
| University of Punjab, Lahore | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | Present | — | — | 11 | [ |
| Faisalabad | ||||||||||||
| Bottled water | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | ||||||
| Ground water | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | 50 | — | — | — | — | [ |
| WASA supply lines | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | ||||||
| Faisalabad | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | 90 | — | — | — | — | [ |
| Faisalabad | 225 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Present | — | Present | 79 | [ |
| Samundri, Faisalabad | 110 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Present | Present | Present | — | [ |
Physicochemical and biological parameters of drinking water quality of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP).
| Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Total | Percentage of samples contaminated | References | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | EC | TDS | Turbidity | Hardness | Physicochemical | Total coliform | Fecal coliform |
| Bacteriological values | |||
| Peshawar | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | Pb, Cd contamination | — | — | — | — | [ |
| Khyber agency | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | Cd | — | — | — | — | [ |
| New urban Peshawar | 30 | — | 100 | — | 90 | — | — | Present | Present | Present | — | [ |
| Gilgit-Baltistan | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Present | — | — | — | [ |
Physicochemical and biological parameters of drinking water quality of Baluchistan.
| Baluchistan | Total | Percentage of samples contaminated | References | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | EC | TDS | Turbidity | Hardness | Physicochemical values | Total coliform | Fecal coliform |
| Bacteriological values | |||
| Hingol river, Baluchistan | 22 | — | 12.5 | — | — | — | — | Present | Present | — | — | [ |
| Quetta | 200 | — | — | — | — | — | 39 | — | — | — | 60 | [ |
| Khudar, Loralai, Quetta, and Ziarat | 66 | — | — | 6 | 7.5 | — | 57.5 | Present | Present | Present | 80.3 | [ |
| Quetta | 16 | — | 12.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | [ |
Physicochemical and biological parameters of drinking water quality of Sindh.
| Sindh | Total | Percentage of samples contaminated | References | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | EC | TDS | Turbidity | Hardness | Physicochemical values | Total coliform | Fecal coliform |
| Bacteriological values | |||
| Khairpur, Sindh | 68 | — | 50 | 20.5 | — | 13.11 | — | — | — | — | — | [ |
| Orangi Town, Karachi | 46 | — | — | 100 | — | — | 39 | Present | Present | Present | 80.43 | [ |
| Sindh | 35 | — | — | 50 | — | 21.88 | — | — | — | — | — | [ |
| Sindh | 46 | — | — | — | 100 | — | — | Present | Present | — | — | [ |
| Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi | 12 | — | — | 8.3 | — | — | — | Present | Present | Present | 41.66 | [ |