Literature DB >> 28884043

Preclinical and clinical applications of specific molecular imaging for HER2-positive breast cancer.

Wei Chen1, Xiaofeng Li1, Lei Zhu1, Jianjing Liu1, Wengui Xu1, Ping Wang1.   

Abstract

Precision medicine and personalized therapy are receiving increased attention, and molecular-subtype classification has become crucial in planning therapeutic schedules in clinical practice for patients with breast cancer. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is associated with high-grade breast tumors, high rates of lymph-node involvement, high risk of recurrence, and high resistance to general chemotherapy. Analysis of HER2 expression is highly important for doctors to identify patients who can benefit from trastuzumab therapy and monitor the response and efficacy of treatment. In recent years, significant efforts have been devoted to achieving specific and noninvasive HER2-positive breast cancer imaging in vivo. In this work, we reviewed existing literature on HER2 imaging in the past decade and summarized the studies from different points of view, such as imaging modalities and HER2-specific probes. We aimed to improve the understanding on the translational process in molecular imaging for HER2 breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2); molecular imaging; probes

Year:  2017        PMID: 28884043      PMCID: PMC5570603          DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Med        ISSN: 2095-3941            Impact factor:   4.248


Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and cause of mortality for women all over the world[1]. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases. The HER2/neu gene is a proto-oncogene located on the long arm of chromosome 17 and encodes a transmembrane receptor protein[2]. The HER2 protein comprises an intracellular domain that can regulate important aspects of the physiology and growth of cells, as well as an extracellular domain that facilitates signal transduction as a receptor. Cultured cells can be transformed into a malignant phenotype upon the overexpression of HER2[2]. HER2/neu amplification and/or overexpression is observed in 15%–20% of patients with breast cancer[3,4]. HER2 is a factor that indicates high-grade breast tumors, high rates of lymph node involvement, high risk of recurrence, and high resistance to general chemotherapy[2]. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer present a worse prognosis than those without HER2 overexpression, indicating that HER2 overexpression can be a marker of aggressive malignancy. Moreover, discordance in HER2 status may exist between primary HER2-positive breast cancer and distant metastasis because of heterogeneity[5]. Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that is FDA-approved for therapeutic use in HER2-positive breast cancer. It is created to specifically bind to HER2 to further inhibit the growth of tumor cells via different mechanisms, including provoking apoptosis, altering downstream signal transduction, and decreasing HER2 expression[1]. Currently, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization are the most important pathological techniques applied in the detection of HER2 amplification and/or overexpression. These techniques have also been recommended as guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists. About 20% of HER2/neu tests (including biopsy and IHC) provide false negative or false positive results because of technical problems, sampling bias, heterogeneity of the tumors and other reasons, which further lead to the improper selection of treatments[6]. Therefore, non-invasive molecular imaging techniques are needed for the accurate assessment of HER2 expression in both primary tumors and distant metastasis in vivo. With the development of molecular imaging, one can now monitor the biological and pathophysiological processes of normal and abnormal tissues in vivo. Molecular imaging can thus be a complementary tool in breast cancer imaging for early detection, specific diagnosis, and evaluation of therapeutic responses. Nuclear medicine imaging [including positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon tomography computed tomography (SPECT)], ultrasound, and MRI are the most popular techniques for HER2 breast cancer imaging in both preclinical and clinical practice.

Preclinical HER2-positive breast cancer imaging

Great efforts have been made to image HER2 positive breast cancer with different modalities in the last decade. Probes are the most critical part for the molecular imaging of breast cancer. Probes should be able to easily penetrate the tumor parenchyma and be far from blood and normal organs to increase the tumor-to-tissue contrast. An optimal molecular probe for HER2-positive tumor imaging should have the following characteristics: (1) The targeting component has high affinity and specificity to the extracellular domain of HER2 protein. Various HER2-targeted parts for molecular imaging tracers, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-based fragments, diabodies, nanobodies, non-immunoglobulin scaffolds, affibodies, peptides, and designed ankyrin-repeat proteins, have been explored for HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosis and therapy in the past few years. (2) The signaling component can elevate the contrast difference between tumors and normal tissues to make tumors visible and detectable. Signaling components are designed on the basis of different imaging modalities.

Nuclear medicine imaging

Nuclear imaging, including PET and SPECT, is the first molecular imaging modality to be applied for cancer in clinical practice. It requires the intravenous administration of radio-labeled materials to generate images. Combining PET or SPECT with computed tomography (CT) or MRI can provide both functional and anatomical information with high resolution. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 99mTc are the most common tracers that are used for PET and SPECT imaging, respectively, but they lack specificity to breast cancer. These agents are designed on the basis of imaging equipment.

PET

The radionuclides that are usually used for HER2 imaging on PET are 18F, 64Cu, 68Ga, 89Zr, and 124I. The comparison of the radionuclides of 68Ga and 111In with the same affibody and chelator shows that 68Ga-labeled affibodies are easier to label and are cleared more quickly from the blood and other healthy tissues, except for kidneys, than 111In-labeled affibodies. 68Ga-labeled affibodies also show good targeting ability and provide good tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-organ ratios within 2 h after injection in favor of clinical imaging[7]. A recent study conjugated the anti-HER2 affibody with 44Sc via a 1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacylododecane-1, 4, 7, 1-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelator for HER2 imaging and compared it with 68Ga-labeled affibody, demonstrating the high specificity of the 44Sc-labeled affibody. The distributions of radioactivity at 3 h after injection for both affibodies were found to be similar, but the blood clearance and tumor-to-blood ratio of the 44Sc-labeled affibody were both lower than those of the 68Ga-labeled one[8]. 18F, with a half-life of 110 min, exhibits ideal nuclear physical characteristics for PET imaging in both experimental and clinical applications. Compared with other metal radioisotopes, 18F is relatively difficult to be introduced into other molecules because its short half-life (<2 h) requires time-efficient synthesis. The direct introduction of 18F usually involves harsh conditions. Efforts have been made to identify new ways to insert 18F-fluorine into organic molecules. Recent studies employed 18F as a radionuclide to label anti-HER2 nanobodies and generated high contrast PET images with high tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios[9-11]. The results demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing 18F-labeled anti-HER2 nanobodies to evaluate HER2 expressing cancers, except for cases of high renal retention, which can be a common problem of 18F-labeled anti-HER2 nanobodies. Studies even used the short-lived 11C (t1/2=20.4 min) to label a HER2 binding affibody molecule with the sel-tagging technique and compared the results with 68Ga-labeled affibodies. These studies found that both 11C-labeled and 68Ga-labeled HER2 affibodies can be cleared rapidly from the blood and that the former shows significantly low kidney retention and overall absorbed dose. 11C-labeled affibodies show excellent tumor-targeting capability and can thus successfully be used for rapid and repeated PET imaging for HER2-positive tumors[12]. The radio-labeled trastuzumab is the representative of monoclonal antibodies that are widely used for imaging HER2-positive breast cancers in vivo in clinical and preclinical studies[13-18]. However, some imaging problems are unavoidable because of their large size (MW=150 kDa), and these problems include long biodistribution time, slow tumor penetration and blood clearance, and low tumor-to-tissue ratio, all of which limit the application of antibodies in molecular imaging. Affibody molecules are a new class of relatively stable small scaffold proteins (6.5 kDa). They are usually 3-alpha-helice proteins based on a 58-amino-acid Z-domain. As a result of their small size, affibodies have shown high binding affinity to targets, rapid blood clearance, and good tumor penetration, making them ideal candidates for molecular imaging. A study comparing the affibody- and antibody-based PET agents for HER2 imaging revealed that both radio-labeled affibodies and antibodies can specifically bind to HER2 and clearly display HER2 expression in xenografts. The uptake of radio-labeled trastuzumab in tumors is higher than that of affibodies, whereas the latter provides better tumor-to-tissue contrast at an earlier time than trastuzumab due to its quicker clearance of radioactivity from blood and normal organs; such finding illustrates that affibody-based molecules might serve as better tracers than antibodies for the imaging of primary HER2 over-expressing tumors with or without distant metastases[19]. A probe of a 64Cu-labeled affibody was synthesized in both monomeric and dimeric forms, and the result showed higher tumor accumulation and higher tumor-to-blood ratio in the monomer form than in the dimer form[20]. A 18F-labeled affibody was utilized to display HER2 expression tumors and HER2 metastatic tumors to the lung via PET[21,22]. Researchers also confirmed the feasibility of using 18F-labeled affibody molecules for the quantitative assessment and monitoring of HER2 down-regulation after treatment of trastuzumab or an inhibitor of heat-shock protein[23,24]. The size of affibodies can be further reduced by truncating the third alpha-helix that does not contribute to receptor recognition during synthesis. For this purpose, a 68Ga-labeled 2-helix small protein (MUT-DS) with a chelator of DOTA was adopted for PET imaging. The result showed high HER2 binding affinity and high tumor accumulation with rapid clearance from normal tissues, indicating the feasibility of a 2-helix protein scaffold serving as a probe to monitor HER2 expression in vivo. The tumor uptake and tumor-to-organ ratio of 68Ga-DOTA-MUT-DS were approximately 103 times lower than those of many 3-helix-affibody molecules. This result is probably due to the relatively weak HER2 binding affinity of the probe, but such characteristic is still acceptable, making 68Ga-DOTA-MUT-DS an alternative candidate with high imaging contrast[25-27]. Recently, 68Ga-labeled anti-HER2 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) was developed to achieve rapid blood clearance and good tumor-to-blood ratio at an early time point. HER2-positive xenografts were visualized successfully with 68Ga-labeled scFv with high accumulation in the tumors, although the tumor-to-blood ratio was relatively low[28]. A good chelator should be able to connect the receptor-binding part and the radionuclide for HER2 imaging. Structures of chelators can affect the clearance rate from blood and tumor uptake, as well as the uptake of normal organs. A study conjugated the following macrocyclic chelators with 68Ga to the N-terminus of the affibody: DOTA, 1,4,1, 4, 7-7-triazacyclononane-N,N,N-triacetic acid (NOTA), and 1-(1,3-carboxypropyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-4,7-diacetic acid (NODAGA); their biodistributions and targeting properties were then compared in vivo[29]. The results showed chelator-dependent differences. The tumor uptake for the 68Ga-DOTA-affibody was significantly higher than that for both 68Ga-NODAGA-affibody and 68Ga-NOTA-affibody at 2 h after injection. This outcome was interpreted as different off-target interactions due to the local charge distribution and conformation of the N-terminus caused by different structures of chelators. The 68Ga-NODAGA-affibody had the highest tumor-to-blood ratio and showed a two fold higher tumor-to-liver ratio than the 68Ga-NOTA-affibody, which is important for detecting liver metastases. Another study compared 64Cu-labeled DOTA and NODAGA antibodies using PET imaging and found that the latter showed favorable performance in vivo with tumor-to-tissue ratios of 2-fold and 1.5-fold higher than the former agent at 24 h and 48 h, respectively[30].

SPECT

Radionuclides that are usually used for SPECT imaging are 86Y, 99mTc, 111In, and 125I. 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-trastuzumab was used for HER2-positive tumor imaging and found to be efficiently labeled with high yields, high stability, and good biodistribution in mice. The uptake of the 111In-labeled trastuzumab in the liver, spleen, and kidney was expected, and no uptake was observed in the brain due to its size[18]. In elevating in vivo targeting capabilities, minimal monovalent binding fragments, such as Fab (~55 kDa) and scFv (~28 kDa) with retained binding specificity, are widely used in molecular imaging studies. Trastuzumab Fab labeled with different radionuclides of 111In and 99mTc are similar in terms of visualizing HER2 xenografts, but 111In-trastuzumab-Fab shows higher tumor-to-tissue ratios that favor the delayed imaging of tumors. Compared with that of intact trastuzumab, the HER2 binding affinity of trastuzumab Fab fragments shows a 2-fold decrease because of their smaller size, which is acceptable[31]. In a study, an affibody-based probe labeled with 99mTc was developed for SPECT imaging. The result revealed high uptake in HER2-expressing tumors and low uptake in the liver. The moderate- and high-level HER2-expressing xenografts can be clearly visualized 1 h after injection of the 99mTc-labeled affibody, thus proving that it can be a potential agent for SPECT imaging to detect HER2-positive tumors[32]. Compared with the 125I-labeled affibody, the 99mTc-labeled agent had higher accumulation in the liver after injection[33].

MRI

In recent years, great progress has been made in MRI, especially for soft tissue imaging. Conventional breast MRI can identify tumors with their manifestations, including size, shape, margin, and signal changes. Currently, the contrast agents commonly used for MR imaging are gadolinium DTPA (decreases T1 relaxation time) and supraparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO, decreases T2 relaxation time), which are non-specific but can increase the signal contrast between tumors and normal tissues. Molecular imaging can be performed upon MRI by using probes that bind to the target protein or molecule specifically. Nanoparticles (NPs) attract great interest in biomedical applications as imaging probes because of their extraordinary properties, including small size, well-modified structure, high binding affinity, long circulating half-life, and high permeability and retention effects that allow an effective accumulation at tumor sites[34-36]. In the literature, magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) conjugated with trastuzumab was designed to detect HER2 expression in vitro and in vivo using 3T MRI[15]. A 45% signal drop was found at the tumor site on T2WI after administration of the agent, proving that trastuzumab-NPs are able to distinguish cells and xenografts with different levels of HER2 expression while ensuring low cytotoxicity and good dispersity. On the basis of this work, the researchers developed HER2-targeted IONPs coated with block copolymer poly (PEO-b-PγMPS) and revealed a signal reduction in the tumor but with a low level of uptake by the reticuloendothelial system; PEO-b-PγMPS was found to be superior to most IONPs that require several weeks to be cleared out of the body from the liver and spleen[37]. Affibody-based SPIO NPs were generated for HER2-specific MR imaging. The agent showed good binding ability, and the tumors were clearly displayed on a gradient-echo sequence on MRI, thus confirming that the affibody-SPIO offers advantageous features that make it a suitable alternative for molecular imaging in comparison with antibody-based MR probes[38].

Optical imaging

Optical imaging is a non-invasive technique to detect and analyze signals originating from bioluminescent and fluorescent probes. It uses visible light and the special properties of photons to obtain detailed images of organs and tissues as well as cells and molecules. Optical imaging technologies rely on light-producing optical reporters, such as luciferase and fluorescent proteins, fluorescent dyes, and NPs. Quantum dots (QDs) are fluorescent nanocrystals (2–10 nm), and QD-based imaging can be used in cancer research to localize tumors and monitor possible changes in receptor expression during the treatment process. As an optional probe for determining HER2 expression levels, QD-based nanotechnology has attracted significant interest in the detection of HER2 breast cancer in vivo and in vitro. Studies have demonstrated that QD-based immunofluorescence technology can be used to quantitatively determine HER2 expression levels and serve as a potentially new method for HER2 detection in clinical practice[39,40]. A study synthesized QD-labeled anti-HER2 antibody and used it for both fixed and live cells. The result showed that the QD bioconjugates can rapidly localize HER2 positive cells, indicating its potential ability for targeted therapy and image-guided surgery[41]. A QD-based double-color imaging technique was reported to show the HER2 levels on breast cancer cells in the tumor matrix. This technique provided direct visible evidence that HER2 expression levels are directly related to cancer invasion[42]. QD-labeled anti-HER2 antibody was applied in the single molecular imaging of breast cancer cells with a high-resolution in vivo 3D microscopic system, and the result showed that cancer cells expressing HER2 can be visualized by the NPs in vivo at subcellular resolution[43]. In animal studies, HER2-xenografts can be visualized with the QD-linked anti-HER2 antibody[43,44]. A QD-conjugated antibody was also used to evaluate its delivery process to tumors, and valuable information on antibody-conjugated therapeutic NPs was obtained to help increase therapeutic efficacy[45].

Multimodal imaging

The development of probes has enhanced the possibility of multimodality imaging of HER2. Sampath et al.[17] first designed a dual-labeled HER2 imaging agent that conjugated trastuzumab with 111In and a fluorescent dye to detect HER2 expression using SPECT and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging in vivo and in vitro. The outcome indicated the molecular specificity of targeting and the correlation between nuclear and optical imaging results, thus confirming the stability of the dual-labeled agent. A few years later, on the basis of their previous work, the authors developed the agent of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab-IRDye800, which was dual-labeled for both PET and NIR fluorescence imaging, to detect metastases of HER2-positive breast cancer[14]. The detection capabilities of the dual-labeled agent and 18F-FDG-PET were similar for primary tumors, but only the former was able to identify lung metastases . The in vitro NIR fluorescence imaging enabled the visualization of channels between the primary tumor and the axillary lymph nodes, thus providing the ability to track the lymphatic route for cancer cells. Qiao et al.[46] developed a novel class of multiple modality contrast agents for MRI and NIR imaging. They designed a Gd3+ binding site into a stable scaffold protein to increase the relaxivity value of both T1 and T2 so that the sensitivity of disease detection was increased, resulting in 100-fold lower dose usage than the clinically used non-targeting agent DTPA. Gao et al.[47] designed affibody-based nanoprobes using NIR QDs and IONPs to image HER2-expressing cells and tumors and found that nanoparticle-affibody conjugates may be excellent candidates as targeting probes for HER2 overexpressing tumor diagnosis. Similarly, antibody conjugated multilayered nanoprobes and NIR QDs were successfully developed and used for both NIR and MR imaging of HER2 cells and tumors[48]. Probes with different HER2-targeting and/or signaling components for HER2 imaging are listed in Table 1.
1

Targeting probes for HER2-positive breast cancer imaging

Imaging modalityYearResearchersProbesSource of signalAgent category
PET2006Smith-Jones PM, et al.[49]68Ga-DOTA-HER2-F(ab')268Ga Antibody fragments
2009Orlova A, et al. [19]124I/125I-PIB-ZHER2:342124I/125I-PIB-trastuzumab 124I/125I Affibody Antibody
2009Ren G, et al.[25]68Ga-DOTA-MUT-DS 68Ga Affibody (2-helix)
2011Kramer-Marek G, et al.[50]68Ga-DOTA-ZHER2:289168Ga Affibody
2011Miao Z, et al.[51]18F-FBO-MUT-DS 18F Affibody (2-helix)
2012Kramer-Marek G, et al. [23]18F-FBEM-HER2:34218F Affibody
2012Wållberg H, et al. [12]68Ga-ZHER2:342-DOTA 11C-ZHER2:342-DOTA 68Ga Affibody
2016Honarvar H, et al. [8]44Sc-DOTA-ZHER2:289168Ga-DOTA-ZHER2:289144Sc 68Ga Affibody
PET/CT2012Kramer-Marek G, et al. [22]18F- ZHER2:34218F Affibody
2013Xavier C, et al. [52]68Ga-NOTA-2Rs15 68Ga Nanobody
2013Strand J, et al.[53]68Ga-DOTA-ZHER2:S168Ga-NODAGA-ZHER2:S168Ga-NOTA-ZHER2:S168Ga Affibody
SPECT2004Lub-de Hooge MN, et al. [13]111In-DTPA-trastuzumab 111In Antibody
2005Tang Y, et al. [31]99mTc-trastuzumab-Fab 111In-trastuzumab-Fab 99mTc 111In Antibody fragments
2006Orlova A, et al.[54]125I-ZHER2:4/Z(HER2:4)2/ZHER2:342125I Affibody
2006Orlova A, et al. [33]99mTc-His6-(ZHER2:4)2125I-His6-(ZHER2:4)299mTc 125I Affibody
2006Steffen AC, et al. [55]125I-(ZHER2:4)2125I Affibody
2009Chen KT, et al. [16]188Re (I)-trastuzumab 188Re Antibody
Continued
Targeting probes for HER2-positive breast cancer imaging

Clinical application of HER2-specific imaging

Thus far, specific HER2 imaging is not widely performed on patients. Most probes are antibody (trastuzumab)-based agents that are labeled with different radionuclides for PET or SPECT imaging. Perik and his colleagues[57] developed 111In-DTPA-trastuzuma for preclinical study in 2004 and used it to predict the cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab and identify tumors in a clinical observation in 2006. Fifteen HER2-positive breast cancer patients with metastases were enrolled, and they underwent SPECT from 15 min to 7 days after administration of 150 MBq radio-labeled trastuzumab. 111In-DTPA-trastuzumab was able to identify HER2-positive tumors, but it cannot predict trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. Dijkers et al.[58] employed 89Zr-trastuzumab as a tracer for PET imaging of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and concluded that the best time for tumor visualization is 4–5 days after injection because of the long half-life of 89Zr. A similar clinical study applied 89Zr-trastuzumab to detect HER2-positive metastases and found no correlation between 89Zr-trastuzumab uptake and HER2 expression level; however, almost half of the positive 89Zr-trastuzumab foci on PET/CT were false positive[59]. Both 89Zr- and 111In- labeled trastuzumab were used to assess the clinical response of HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer to the therapy of a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor or trastuzumab, respectively[60-62]. HER2 imaging can also predict the response to trastuzumab if combined with the traditional 18F-FDG PET and if responders can be differentiated from non-responders[62]. Probes radio labeled with 64Cu have also been applied in clinical practice in some studies. PET or PET/CT with the probe of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab has been performed on patients with primary and/or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer[63,64]. Both primary breast tumors and metastases in the brain, liver, bone, and lymph nodes were identified with generally high image quality and tumor-to-tissue contrast. Furthermore, CT-positive lesions were detected by 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab but not by 18F-FDG in some lesions, and false positivity of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab occurred in only one instance. According to the results, tumor uptake and the radiation exposure of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab were both comparable to those of 18F-FDG, thus demonstrating the feasibility of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab as a potentially safe probe to detect the primary and metastatic lesions of HER2-positive breast cancer for clinical use[63]. Another study, which involved eight patients of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, preinjected 45 mg trastuzumab before the introduction of the 64Cu-trastuzumab, and an approximately 75% reduction in liver uptake of 64Cu was found but without significant changes in tumor uptake. This result provided a new strategy for a favorable biodistribution of 64Cu and visualization of liver metastases[64]. 111In- or 68Ga-labeled affibody (ABY-002) molecules were first used in a clinical study involving only three patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer. The blood kinetics analysis showed rapid blood clearance of the radio-labeled agents in humans with the first half-life of 4–11 min for the 111In-labeled affibody and 10–14 min for the 68Ga-labeled affibody. The images of SPECT or PET/CT were compared with those of 18F-FDG PET/CT, and most of the lesions identified by 18F-FDG PET/CT were also visualized with the 111In- or 68Ga-labeled affibody, except for one lesion of liver metastasis and another lesion close to the kidney. Both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-labeled affibody can improve the diagnosis of metastasis in comparison with CT. They concluded that the affibody is more adaptable for clinical practice with high detection rate compared with antibodies or fragments, although further clinical studies are still needed[65]. Considering the high liver uptake of radio-labeled affibodies, Sörensen et al.[66] developed a second-generation affibody with improved biochemical and biophysical characteristics and used it in seven patients of recurrent metastatic HER2-positive or HER2-negative breast cancer. The 111In-labeled affibody can discriminate the metastases with high or low HER2 expression. The uptake of HER2-positive metastases increased between 4 and 24 h after injection, whereas it decreased in the negative metastases in the same time duration. Detailed comparisons of sensitivity and/or specificity of radio-labeled trastuzumab vs. 111In-labeled affibody were not permitted due to limited clinical studies. Most recently, 68Ga-HER2-nanobody was used for the visualization of both primary and metastatic HER2 positive lesions, and it showed favorable biodistribution and zero toxicity[67]. These clinical findings related to HER2 imaging confirm that HER2-targeted imaging can be applied to disease detection, staging, and therapy response monitoring through the determination of the HER2 expression of breast tumors. Probes and trials for clinical HER2-imaging are listed in . Clinical applications of probes for HER2-positive breast cancer imaging

Conclusions

HER2 plays an important role in cancer progression and prognosis of breast cancer. Increasing attention has been paid to the imaging of HER2 -positive breast cancer. This technology can help to identify patients who would benefit from trastuzumab therapy and monitor the response and efficacy of treatment. In addition, it can detect the discordance of HER2 status between primary breast cancer and distant metastases. Most HER2-targeting probes are still in experimental and preclinical status. Among these techniques, nuclear medicine imaging seems to be the most popular applied imaging modality for HER2 -positive tumors, although technical complexity in probe synthesis and the stability, safety, and toxicity of the probes themselves may limit the clinical applications of HER2 specific probes.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81202795) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2015M571271). The authors thank Ms. Samantha Calva for polishing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.
1
Continued
Imaging modalityYearResearchersProbesSource of signalAgent category
Note: * Dual-labeled probes; ABY-002: ZHER2:342-pep2; DOTA: 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid; DTPA: diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; FBEM: (2-(4-18F-fluorobenzamido) ethyl) maleimide; FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IO: iron oxide (Fe3O4); MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NIR: near-infrared; NODAGA:1-(1,3-carboxypropyl)-1,4,7- triazacyclononane-4,7-diacetic acid; NOTA: 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N,N-triacetic acid; PET: positron emission tomography; PET/CT: positron emission tomography/ computed tomography; SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography; SPIO: supraparamagnetic iron oxide.
2009McLarty K, et al. [18]111In-DTPA-trastuzumab 111In Antibody
2009Ahlgren S, et al. [32]99mTc-ZHER2:239599mTc Affibody
2011Wållberg H, et al. [56]99mTc-ZHER2:34299mTc Affibody
2012Rosik D, et al.[27]111In-PEP09239 111In-ABY-002 111In Affibody (2-helix) Affibody (3-helix)
MRI2009Chen T, et al.[15]Herceptin-SPIOSPIOAntibody
2010Kinoshita M, et al. [38]HER2-affibody-SPIOSPIOAffibody
SPECT/NIR2007Sampath L, et al.[17]111In-DTPA-trastuzumab-IRDye800* 111In/IR-Dye800 Antibody
PET/NIR2010Sampath L, et al.[14]64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab-IRDye800* 64Cu/IR-Dye800 Antibody
MRI/NIR2011Gao J, et al. [47]IO-affibody-QD800*IO/QD800Affibody
MRI/NIR2011Qiao J, et al. [46]Gd3+-affibody-Cy5.5* Gd3+/IR-Dye Cy5.5 Affibody
MRI/NIR2012Ma Q, et al. [48]IO-antibody-QD780*IO/QD780Antibody
2

Clinical applications of probes for HER2-positive breast cancer imaging

Agent categoryYearResearchersImaging probesImaging approachesSource of signalSubjects
Note: ABY-002: ZHER2:342-pep2; DOTA: 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid; DTPA: diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PET: positron emission tomography; PET/CT: positron emission tomography/computed tomography; SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography.
Antibody- based2006Perik, et al. [57]111In-DTPA- trastuzumab SPECT111In Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
2009Dijkers, et al.[58]89Zr-trastuzumab PET89Zr Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
2013Tamura, et al. [63]64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET/CT64Cu Patients with primary or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer
2014Mortimer, et al. [64]64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET/CT64Cu Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
2014Gaykema, et al. [60]89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT89Zr Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
2014Gaykema, et al.[61]111In-trastuzumab SPECT111In Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
2016Ulaner, et al. [59]89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT89Zr Patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer
Affibody-based2010Baum, et al. [65]111In-ABY-002 68Ga-ABY-002 SPECT PET/CT111In 68Ga Patients with recurrent metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer
2014Sörensen, et al. [66]111In-ABY-025 SPECT/CT111In Patients with metastatic HER2-positive and -negative breast cancer
Nanobody-based2016Keyaerter, et al. [67]68Ga-HER2-nanobody PET/CT68Ga Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer
  10 in total

1.  Preclinical Evaluation of 18F-Labeled Anti-HER2 Nanobody Conjugates for Imaging HER2 Receptor Expression by Immuno-PET.

Authors:  Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Darryl McDougald; Jaeyeon Choi; Eftychia Koumarianou; Douglas Weitzel; Takuya Osada; H Kim Lyerly; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  HER2-positive tumors imaged within 1 hour using a site-specifically 11C-labeled Sel-tagged affibody molecule.

Authors:  Helena Wållberg; Jonas Grafström; Qing Cheng; Li Lu; Hanna-Stina Martinsson Ahlzén; Erik Samén; Jan-Olov Thorell; Katarina Johansson; Finn Dunås; Maria Hägg Olofsson; Sharon Stone-Elander; Elias S J Arnér; Stefan Ståhl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Evaluation of the first 44Sc-labeled Affibody molecule for imaging of HER2-expressing tumors.

Authors:  Hadis Honarvar; Cristina Müller; Susan Cohrs; Stephanie Haller; Kristina Westerlund; Amelie Eriksson Karlström; Nicholas P van der Meulen; Roger Schibli; Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A HER2-binding Affibody molecule labelled with 68Ga for PET imaging: direct in vivo comparison with the 111In-labelled analogue.

Authors:  Vladimir Tolmachev; Irina Velikyan; Mattias Sandström; Anna Orlova
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  NCCN Guidelines Insights Breast Cancer, Version 1.2016.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Benjamin O Anderson; Ron Balassanian; Sarah L Blair; Harold J Burstein; Amy Cyr; Anthony D Elias; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Matthew Goetz; Lori J Goldstein; Clifford A Hudis; Steven J Isakoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Meena Moran; Sameer A Patel; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Kilian E Salerno; Lee S Schwartzberg; Karen Lisa Smith; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Melinda Telli; John H Ward; Dottie A Shead; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 7.  Testing for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nandini Dendukuri; Karim Khetani; Michelle McIsaac; James Brophy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  (18)F-nanobody for PET imaging of HER2 overexpressing tumors.

Authors:  Catarina Xavier; Anneleen Blykers; Ilse Vaneycken; Matthias D'Huyvetter; Jan Heemskerk; Tony Lahoutte; Nick Devoogdt; Vicky Caveliers
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  HER-2 status discrepancy between primary breast cancer and metastatic sites. Impact on target therapy.

Authors:  Alfredo Santinelli; Eleonora Pisa; Daniela Stramazzotti; Guidalberto Fabris
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.534

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  HER-2-Targeted Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sitia; Marta Sevieri; Lorena Signati; Arianna Bonizzi; Arianna Chesi; Francesco Mainini; Fabio Corsi; Serena Mazzucchelli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Novel Strategies on Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update.

Authors:  Carmen W H Chan; Bernard M H Law; Winnie K W So; Ka Ming Chow; Mary M Y Waye
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A preliminary clinical trial to evaluate 64Cu-NOTA-Trastuzumab as a positron emission tomography imaging agent in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ilhan Lim; Woo Chul Noh; Inki Lee; Byung Hyun Byun; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Sang-Keun Woo; Kwang Il Kim; Kyo Chul Lee; Joo Hyun Kang; Min-Ki Seong; Hyun-Ah Kim; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  The Prediction of HER2-Targeted Treatment Response Using 64Cu-Tetra-Azacyclododecanetetra-Acetic Acid (DOTA)-Trastuzumab PET/CT in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ilhan Lim; Woo Chul Noh; Inki Lee; Byung Hyun Byun; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Kyo Chul Lee; Choong Mo Kang; Min-Ki Seong; Hyun-Ah Kim; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Twist1 accelerates tumour vasculogenic mimicry by inhibiting Claudin15 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Danfang Zhang; Baocun Sun; Xiulan Zhao; Huizhi Sun; Jindan An; Xian Lin; Dongwang Zhu; Xueming Zhao; Xudong Wang; Fang Liu; Yanhui Zhang; Jiameng Liu; Qiang Gu; Xueyi Dong; Zhiqiang Qiu; Zhiyong Liu; Hong Qi; Na Che; Jing Li; Runfen Cheng; Xu Zheng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 6.  Monoclonal antibody-based molecular imaging strategies and theranostic opportunities.

Authors:  Niels Dammes; Dan Peer
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.