| Literature DB >> 28883941 |
Isabelle A Nakhla1, John W Sanders2, Emad W Mohareb1, Sahar Samy3, Michael T Cosby1, Manal M Mostafa1, Mark S Riddle1, Robert W Frenck4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) continues to be a burden to the Egyptian population and its economy. Despite all efforts, the prevalence of infection continues to be one of the highest in the world. The high national prevalence has been attributed to unintentional, nosocomial spread during an anti-schistosomiasis campaign conducted in the 1970's, but that does not fully explain the persistent infection rates. Work is needed to further clarify risk associations. A serosurvey was performed in Manshiet Nasser, a slum in Cairo sometimes referred to as Mokattem Hills where a primary occupation is garbage collection and sorting, to characterize potential risk factors for infection.Entities:
Keywords: Cluster survey; Egypt; Garbage collectors; Hepatitis C virus; Needles; Occupational exposure; Prevalence; Risk factors; Slum; Tatoo
Year: 2015 PMID: 28883941 PMCID: PMC5531004 DOI: 10.1186/s40794-015-0012-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines ISSN: 2055-0936
Fig. 1Census Demographic Tree. Age and gender distribution of population assessed by the census of Manshiet Nasser, 2003
Demographic characteristic differences between participants (submitted a blood sample) and non-participants (only completed census survey) in HCV serosurvey in Manshiet Nasser, 2003
| Socio demographic characteristicsa | Participants | Non-Participants |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Age (95 % CI) | 21 (20–22) | 24 (24–25) | 0.0001 |
| Head of House Hold | 372 (17) | 411 (26) | 0.0001 |
| Ever-Married | 841 (65) | 679 (60) | 0.003 |
| Education | |||
| No education | 616 (35) | 442 (32) | 0.05 |
| Primary and Preparatory | 831 (47) | 555 (40) | <0.0001 |
| Secondary and above | 331 (18) | 378 (27) | <0.0001 |
| Current work status | |||
| Not working | 265 (15) | 201 (15) | 0.9 |
| House wife/Students | 965 (55) | 545 (42) | <0.0001 |
| Garbage collector, sorter and recycler | 260 (15) | 166 (13) | 0.08 |
| Manual laborer/drivers/shop workers | 233 (13) | 332 (25) | <0.0001 |
| Office work | 27 (2) | 69 (5) | <0.0001 |
| Origination | |||
| Upper Egypt (Rural) | 436 (20) | 279 (18) | 0.1 |
| Lower Egypt (Rural) | 24 (1) | 26 (2) | 0.01 |
| Urban Governorates | 401 (18) | 460 (29) | <0.0001 |
| Born in Mokkattam | 1313 (60) | 811 (51) | <0.0001 |
| Standard of living considered to be poor | 393 (18) | 210 (13) | <0.0001 |
*Chi-square was used for n (%) while T-test was used for mean age
aAll results are n (%) except for mean age (CI)
Demographic characteristic differences between HCV-positive and HCV-negative volunteers in Manshiet Nasser, 2003
| Demographic characteristics | HCVa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Crude Prevalence Ratio (PR) | Adjusted PRc |
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| ||||
| Age (years) | |||||
| 0–12 | 4/180 (2) | 818/1989 (41) | 1 | ||
| 13–30 | 28/180 (16) | 764/1989 (38) | 7.0 | <0.001 | |
| 31 and above | 148/180 (82) | 407/1989 (21) | 54.6 | <0.0001 | |
| Meane (95 % CI) | 41 (39, 43) | 19 (18, 20) | |||
| Male | 89/180 (49) | 903/1989 (45) | 1.2 | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | NS |
| Head of House Hold | 89/180 (49) | 282/1989 (14) | 4.8 | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) | <0.05 |
| Ever-Marriedd | 155/172 (90) | 685/1112 (62) | 5.3 | 1.1 (0.6–2.1) | NS |
| Respondents with no educatione | 109/176 (62) | 506/1599 (32) | 3.2 | 1.4 (1.1–1.9) | <0.05 |
| Current work status | |||||
| Not working/House wife/Students | 77/161 (48) | 1151/1587 (73) | 1 | 1 | |
| Garbage collector, sorter and recycler | 40/161 (25) | 220/1587 (14) | 2.4 | 1.5 (1.1–2.2) | <0.05 |
| Manual laborer/drivers/shop workers | 41/161 (25) | 192/1587 (12) | 2.8 | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | NS |
| Office work | 3/161 (2) | 24/1587 (2) | 1.8 | 0.7(0.3–1.9) | NS |
| Ever sort garbage | 83/180 (46) | 558/1989 (28) | 2.1 | 1.7 (1.3–2.2) | <0.0001 |
| Previous residence | |||||
| Upper Egypt | 86/179 (48) | 348/1984 (17) | 7.7 | 1.4 (0.9–2.0) | NS |
| Lower Egypt | 7/179 (4) | 17/1984 (1) | 10.9 | 1.7 (0.8–3.3) | NS |
| Urban Governorates | 49/179 (27) | 352/1984 (18) | 4.8 | 0.8 (0.5–1.2) | NS |
| Manshiet Nasser Natives | 37/179 (21) | 1267/1984 (64) | 1 | 1 | |
| Standard of living below community level | 42/180 (23) | 348/1989 (18) | 1.4 | 1.4 (1.0–1.9) | 0.05 |
aAll results are n (%) except for mean age (CI)
bNumbers may not add up to (n) due to missing answers/eligibility to the question
cAdjusted for age
dEver married respondents in the age of marriage (13 +) were compared to never married respondents within the same age category
eRespondents greater than 6 years who have no education is compared to respondents greater than 6 years who have any education
fNS is not statistically significant
Fig. 2Prevalence (%) of HCV infection by gender and age group in Manshiet Nasser, 2003
Differences in self-reported potential risk factors for HCV acquisition between HCV-positive and HCV-negative volunteers in Manshiet Nasser, 2003
| Probable risk factors | Anti-HCV* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Crude P.R. | Adjustedb | |
| n(%) | n(%) | P.R. (95 % CI.) | ||
|
|
| |||
| Previous surgery | 122/180 (68) | 966/1989 (49) | 2.1 | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) |
| Any medical procedure | 95/176 (54) | 588/1972 (30) | 2.6 | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) |
| Previous dental work | 139/180 (77) | 993/1987 (50) | 3.2 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) |
| Ever received blood transfusion | 23/176 (13) | 57/1981 (3) | 3.9 | 2.0 (1.5–2.8)* |
| Have any tattoos | 103/180 (57) | 927/1989 (47) | 1.5 | 1.4 (1.1–1.9)** |
| Share razor blades | 10/89 (11) | 75/904 (8) | 1.3 | 0.7 (0.4–1.3) |
| Go to the barber | 89/89 (100) | 858/893 (96) | N/Ac | N/Ac |
| Ever have abortion/deliveries | 80/82 (97) | 410/512 (80) | 8.9 | 3.6 (0.8–16.0) |
| Received injection >10 injections | 130/179 (73) | 847/1986 (43) | 3.4 | 1.5 (1.1–2.0) |
| Reuse of needles for injections | 9/170 (5) | 42/1681 (2) | 2.0 | 1.0 (0.5–1.7) |
| Have ear/body piercing | 92/180 (51) | 1063/1988 (53) | 0.9 | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
| Ever diagnosed of having Schistosomiasis | 39/177 (22) | 109/1967 (6) | 3.8 | 1.5 (1.1–2.1)*** |
| Have a family member has HCV | 32/179 (18) | 384/1960 (19) | 0.9 | 1.0 (0.7–1.4) |
| Individual at work known to have HCV | 11/168 (7) | 104/1821 (6) | 1.1 | 1.0 (0.6–1.6) |
| Never sort garbage with gloves | 79/83 (95) | 534/558 (96) | 0.9 | 0.8 (0.4–1.7) |
| Ever come across medical waste while sorting | 74/83 (89) | 489/558 (88) | 1.2 | 0.8 (0.5–1.4) |
| Ever stuck by any sharp object while sorting | 77/83 (93) | 494/558 (89) | 1.6 | 1.0 (0.5–2.1) |
* p = <.0001
** p = <0.05
*** p = <0.01
aNumbers may not add up to (n) or (100 %) due to missing answers/eligibility to the question
bAdjusted for age
cNot applicable
Differences in toileting facilities and crowding between HCV-positive and HCV-negative volunteers in Manshiet Nasser, 2003
| Probable risk factors | HCVa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive, n(%) | Negative n(%) | Crude P.R. | Adjusted PR (95 % CI)b |
| |
|
|
| ||||
| The floor is made of earth & sand | 12/179 (7) | 100/1984 (5) | 1.4 | 1.0 (0.6–1.7) | |
| Traditional latrine | 148/179 (83) | 1384/1984 (70) | 2.0 | 2.0 (1.4–2.9) | <0.001 |
| Use covered pit/uncovered pit for sanitationc | 63/179 (35) | 537/1984 (27) | 1.4 | 1.3 (1.0–1.9) | <0.05 |
| More than three persons per bedroom | 55/178 (31) | 596/1978 (30) | 1.0 | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | |
| No hand washing facility | 36/179 (20) | 326/1984 (16) | 1.3 | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | |
aNumbers may not add up to (n) or (100 %) due to missing answers/eligibility to the question
bPrevalence Ratio Adjusted for Age (95 % Confidence Interval)
cCompared to municipal
Multivariate analysis of demographic characteristics and risk behavior associated with HCV infection, Manshiet Nasser 2003
| Demographic and risk factors* | PR (95 % CI)a |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age 13–30 | 14.4 (2.0–104.5) | <0.01 |
| Age 31 and above | 125.5 (17.2–915.1) | <0.0001 |
| Head of Household | 1.2 (0.8–1.7) | |
| No formal education | 1.4 (0.9–2.0) | |
| Standard of living considered to be poor | 1.2 (0.7–1.9) | |
| Ever Sort Garbage | 1.5 (1.0–2.4) | 0.05 |
| Ever get blood transfusion | 2.8 (1.5–5.2) | 0.001 |
| Have any tattoos | 1.3 (0.8–2.0) | |
| Ever diagnosed with schistosomiasis | 1.8 (1.1–2.9) | <0.05 |
| Have a traditional latrine | 2.1 (1.3–3.4) | <0.01 |
*All variables with p = 0.05 or lower were included in the multivariate model, the variable “Use covered pit/uncovered pit for sanitation” were dropped because it was affecting some of the other variables
aPrevalence Ratio (95 % Confidence Interval)