| Literature DB >> 28883886 |
Young Joo Park1,2, Jun-Hyeong Do1,2, Honggie Kim3, Jong Yeol Kim1,2.
Abstract
Sasang constitutional medicine (SCM) is a type of traditional Korean medicine (TKM) that classifies the human constitution into four types. The appearance of the complexion is one of the diagnostic factors of SCM but is rarely used in a quantitative and objective manner for diagnosis. In this study, an analysis using actual clinical data was conducted to assess the use of the complexion as a diagnostic element. A total of 528 Sasang medicine prescriptions from Korea Constitutional Multicenter Bank (KCMB) were classified into either a Cold-prescription group or a Heat-prescription group, and the complexion differences of the patients were analyzed using the L⁎a⁎b⁎ color space. After adjusting for age, BMI, and systolic blood pressure, significant differences were observed among the Cold- and Heat-prescription groups within each Sasang constitution. However, when the Sasang constitution was ignored, no significant difference was observed for either sex. This study quantitatively analyzed the complexion of patients, which is used as a diagnostic element in clinical practice. It is hoped that the results will contribute to objective medical treatments in the future, such as determining an appropriate herbal prescription based on the patient's complexion.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28883886 PMCID: PMC5573096 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9701978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Cold-Heat prescription and composition.
| Sasang type | Cold and Heat prescription | Name of prescription | Prescription composition | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TE type | Cold prescription | Taeumjowi-tang | Coicis Semen, Castaneae Semen, Raphani Semen, Schisandrae Fructus, Liriopis seu Ophiopogonis Tuber, Acori Graminei Rhizoma, Platycodonis Radix, Ephedrae Herba | 11 | 21 |
| Choweseuncheng-tang | Coicis Semen, Castaneae Semen, Raphani Semen, Ephedrae Herba, Platycodonis Radix, Liriopis seu Ophiopogonis Tuber, Schisandrae Fructus, Acori Graminei Rhizoma, Polygalae Radix, Asparagi Tuber, Zizyphi Semen, Longan Arillus | 17 | 28 | ||
|
| |||||
| TE type | Heat prescription | Galgeunhaegi-tang | Puerariae Radix, Scutellariae Radix, Ligustici Tenuissimi Rhizoma et Radix, Platycodonis Radix, Cimicifugae Rhizoma, Angelicae Dahuricae Radix | 9 | 9 |
| Yuldahanso-tang | Puerariae Radix, Scutellariae Radix, Ligustici Tenuissimi Rhizoma et Radix, Raphani Semen, Platycodonis Radix, Cimicifugae Rhizoma, Angelicae Dahuricae Radix | 33 | 61 | ||
|
| |||||
| SE type | Cold prescription | Jeokbaekhaogwanjung-tang | Cynanchi Wilfordii Radix, Polygoni Multiflori Radix, Alpiniae Officinari Rhizoma, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Citri Unshius Pericarpium Immaturus, Cyperi Rhizoma, Alpiniae Oxyphyllae Fructus, Zizyphi Fructus | 2 | 9 |
| Gwankeibujalijung-tang | Ginseng Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Cinnamomi Cortex, Paeoniae Radix, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Aconiti Lateralis Radix Preparata | 6 | 12 | ||
| Baekhaolijung-tang | Cynanchi Wilfordii Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Paeoniae Radix, Cinnamomi Ramulus, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma | 1 | 2 | ||
| Osuyubujalijung-tang | Ginseng Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Cinnamomi Cortex, Paeoniae Radix, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Evodiae Fructus, Foeniculi Fructus, Psoraleae Semen, Aconiti Lateralis Radix Preparata | 0 | 1 | ||
| Hyangsayangwi-tang | Ginseng Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Paeoniae Radix, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Pinelliae Tuber, Cyperi Rhizoma, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Crataegi Fructus, Amomi Fructus, Amomi Fructus Rotundus, Perillae Folium, Zizyphi Fructus | 1 | 6 | ||
|
| |||||
| SE type | Heat prescription | Palmulgunja-tang | Ginseng Radix, Astragali Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Paeoniae Radix, Angelicae Gigantis Radix, Cnidii Rhizoma, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Perillae Folium, Zizyphi Fructus | 31 | 38 |
| Bojungikgi-tang | Ginseng Radix, Astragali Radix, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Angelicae Gigantis Radix, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Pogostemonis Herba, Perillae Folium, Zizyphi Fructus | 3 | 0 | ||
|
| |||||
| SY type | Cold prescription | Hyungbangsabaek-san | Rehmanniae Radix Recens, Poria Sclerotium, Alismatis Rhizoma, Anemarrhenae Rhizoma, Gypsum Fibrosum, Osterici seu Notopterygii Radix et Rhizoma, Araliae Continentalis Radix, Schizonepetae Spica, Saposhnikoviae Radix | 9 | 16 |
| Hyeongbangdojeok-san | Rehmanniae Radix Recens, Akebiae Caulis, Scrophulariae Radix, Trichosanthis Semen, Peucedani Radix, Osterici seu Notopterygii Radix et Rhizoma, Araliae Continentalis Radix, Schizonepetae Spica, Saposhnikoviae Radix | 3 | 31 | ||
| Hyeongbangjihwang-tang | Rehmanniae Radix Preparata, Corni Fructus, Poria Sclerotium, Alismatis Rhizoma, Plantaginis Semen, Osterici seu Notopterygii Radix et Rhizoma, Araliae Continentalis Radix, Schizonepetae Spica, Saposhnikoviae Radix | 21 | 86 | ||
|
| |||||
| SY type | Heat prescription | Yanggyeoksanhwa-tang | Rehmanniae Radix Recens, Lonicerae Folium et Caulis, Forsythiae Fructus, Gardeniae Fructus, Menthae Herba, Anemarrhenae Rhizoma, Gypsum Fibrosum, Saposhnikoviae Radix, Schizonepetae Spica | 28 | 33 |
General characteristics of the subjects.
| TE type | SE type | SY type | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | HG |
| CG | HG |
| CG | HG |
| |
| Males | |||||||||
|
| 28 | 42 | 10 | 34 | 33 | 28 | |||
| Age | 45.11 ± 2.79 | 47.74 ± 2.55 | 0.499 | 43.38 ± 4.39 | 43.10 ± 2.78 | 0.962 | 43.32 ± 2.40 | 49.97 ± 2.86 | 0.078 |
| Height | 172.37 ± 1.15 | 171.57 ± 1.08 | 0.622 | 168.93 ± 2.03 | 171.1 ± 0.98 | 0.310 | 172.49 ± 1.13 | 171.03 ± 1.26 | 0.390 |
| Weight | 77.76 ± 1.70 | 76.26 ± 1.52 | 0.520 | 60.86 ± 1.64 | 63.70 ± 1.40 | 0.200 | 70.62 ± 1.43 | 70.72 ± 1.69 | 0.962 |
| BMI | 26.24 ± 0.63 | 25.86 ± 0.40 | 0.594 | 21.41 ± 0.79 | 21.76 ± 0.44 | 0.706 | 23.73 ± 0.41 | 24.16 ± 0.50 | 0.505 |
| Females | |||||||||
|
| 49 | 70 | 30 | 38 | 133 | 33 | |||
| Age | 44.78 ± 2.04 | 47.09 ± 1.78 | 0.399 | 49.55 ± 2.82 | 39.34 ± 2.44 | 0.008 | 44.28 ± 1.27 | 53.20 ± 2.66 | 0.002 |
| Height | 160.08 ± 0.76 | 159.75 ± 0.61 | 0.734 | 157.31 ± 1.10 | 159.71 ± 0.96 | 0.105 | 158.23 ± 0.50 | 157.02 ± 0.93 | 0.274 |
| Weight | 64.10 ± 0.99 | 65.26 ± 0.98 | 0.422 | 49.58 ± 1.10 | 53.91 ± 1.01 | 0.005 | 54.60 ± 0.64 | 55.33 ± 1.14 | 0.604 |
| BMI | 25.04 ± 0.38 | 25.60 ± 0.39 | 0.319 | 20.07 ± 0.44 | 21.15 ± 0.37 | 0.061 | 21.81 ± 0.25 | 22.44 ± 0.43 | 0.251 |
Data are presented in means ± standard error. CG, Cold-prescription group; HG, Heat-prescription group. p < 0.01. The analysis of statistical data was performed using t-test.
Figure 1Facial complexion regions for the forehead, cheek, and nose. The regions are defined by the facial landmarks.
Figure 2L a b color space [15]. (a) sRGB gamut when L value is 75. (b) sRGB gamut when L value is 50. (c) sRGB gamut when L value is 25. (d) sRGB gamut within Lab color space.
Figure 3Scatter plot of the Lab values versus age. Pearson correlation coefficients for associations of total L, total a, and total b values with age are presented in the figures with p value. (a) Scatter plot of the total L value versus age. (b) Scatter plot of the total a value versus age. (c) Scatter plot of the total b value versus age.
Figure 4Scatter plot of the Lab values versus BMI. Pearson correlation coefficients for associations of total L, total a, and total b values with BMI are presented in the figures with p value. (a) Scatter plot of the total L value versus BMI. (b) Scatter plot of the total a value versus BMI. (c) Scatter plot of the total b value versus BMI.
Figure 5Scatter plot of the Lab values versus systolic blood pressure (SBP). Pearson correlation coefficients for associations of total L, total a, and total b values with SBP are presented in the figures with p value. (a) Scatter plot of the total L value versus SBP. (b) Scatter plot of the total a value versus SBP. (c) Scatter plot of the total b value versus SBP.
Facial complexion for males according to Cold- and Heat-prescription group.
| Region |
| Group | All males | Tae-Eum type | So-Eum type | So-Yang type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE |
| Mean ± SE |
| Mean ± SE |
| Mean ± SE |
| |||
| Total |
| CG | 58.99 ± 0.37 | 0.666 | 58.29 ± 0.53 | 0.151 | 59.84 ± 1.13 | 0.942 | 58.95 ± 0.53 | 0.023 |
| HG | 58.78 ± 0.31 | 59.28 ± 0.43 | 59.94 ± 0.61 | 57.08 ± 0.58 | ||||||
|
| CG | 13.98 ± 0.21 | 0.192 | 14.18 ± 0.33 | 0.045 | 12.65 ± 0.52 | 0.128 | 14.40 ± 0.27 | 0.264 | |
| HG | 14.34 ± 0.18 | 15.06 ± 0.27 | 13.57 ± 0.28 | 13.93 ± 0.30 | ||||||
|
| CG | 19.62 ± 0.21 | 0.838 | 19.20 ± 0.32 | 0.307 | 19.00 ± 0.52 | 0.049 | 20.09 ± 0.33 | 0.072 | |
| HG | 19.68 ± 0.18 | 19.63 ± 0.26 | 20.21 ± 0.28 | 19.17 ± 0.36 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Forehead |
| CG | 63.52 ± 0.47 | 0.959 | 62.91 ± 0.72 | 0.694 | 63.66 ± 1.46 | 0.191 | 63.66 ± 0.61 | 0.013 |
| HG | 63.49 ± 0.40 | 63.28 ± 0.59 | 65.88 ± 0.79 | 61.31 ± 0.66 | ||||||
|
| CG | 13.18 ± 0.26 | 0.209 | 13.22 ± 0.04 | 0.016 | 11.73 ± 0.67 | 0.188 | 13.82 ± 0.34 | 0.117 | |
| HG | 13.62 ± 0.22 | 14.51 ± 0.33 | 12.75 ± 0.36 | 13.00 ± 0.37 | ||||||
|
| CG | 20.66 ± 0.26 | 0.858 | 20.20 ± 0.40 | 0.680 | 19.86 ± 0.63 | 0.018 | 21.33 ± 0.37 | 0.004 | |
| HG | 20.60 ± 0.22 | 20.41 ± 0.32 | 21.62 ± 0.34 | 19.64 ± 0.41 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Cheek |
| CG | 55.69 ± 0.36 | 0.515 | 55.03 ± 0.48 | 0.018 | 56.42 ± 1.12 | 0.433 | 55.67 ± 0.56 | 0.067 |
| HG | 55.38 ± 0.31 | 56.53 ± 0.39 | 55.41 ± 0.60 | 54.08 ± 0.61 | ||||||
|
| CG | 14.22 ± 0.20 | 0.233 | 14.57 ± 0.32 | 0.166 | 13.10 ± 0.50 | 0.205 | 14.41 ± 0.27 | 0.730 | |
| HG | 14.54 ± 0.17 | 15.15 ± 0.26 | 13.84 ± 0.27 | 14.27 ± 0.30 | ||||||
|
| CG | 18.98 ± 0.22 | 0.549 | 18.65 ± 0.32 | 0.182 | 18.53 ± 0.54 | 0.201 | 19.27 ± 0.37 | 0.617 | |
| HG | 19.15 ± 0.18 | 19.20 ± 0.26 | 19.32 ± 0.29 | 18.99 ± 0.40 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Nose |
| CG | 63.14 ± 0.45 | 0.558 | 62.31 ± 0.71 | 0.750 | 64.97 ± 1.36 | 0.716 | 62.96 ± 0.56 | 0.028 |
| HG | 62.79 ± 0.38 | 62.01 ± 0.58 | 65.54 ± 0.73 | 61.05 ± 0.61 | ||||||
|
| CG | 15.60 ± 0.28 | 0.177 | 15.68 ± 0.46 | 0.019 | 13.68 ± 0.70 | 0.065 | 16.38 ± 0.36 | 0.063 | |
| HG | 16.11 ± 0.24 | 17.13 ± 0.38 | 15.19 ± 0.38 | 15.35 ± 0.39 | ||||||
|
| CG | 19.53 ± 0.25 | 0.488 | 18.85 ± 0.36 | 0.406 | 18.39 ± 0.74 | 0.051 | 20.36 ± 0.35 | 0.001 | |
| HG | 19.30 ± 0.21 | 19.24 ± 0.29 | 20.09 ± 0.40 | 18.54 ± 0.38 | ||||||
Total is the average Lab value calculated using the Lab value of three regions (forehead, cheek, and nose). SE, standard error; CG, Cold-prescription group; HG, Heat-prescription group. p < 0.05; p < 0.01. The analysis of statistical data was performed using ANCOVA. The mean and p value were adjusted by covariates (age, BMI, and systolic blood pressure).
Facial complexion for females according to Cold- and Heat-prescription groups.
| Region |
| Group | All females | Tae-Eum type | So-Eum type | So-Yang type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE |
| Mean ± SE |
| Mean ± SE |
| Mean ± SE |
| |||
| Total |
| CG | 63.83 ± 0.21 | 0.848 | 63.83 ± 0.49 | 0.157 | 64.66 ± 0.58 | 0.137 | 63.65 ± 0.23 | 0.041 |
| HG | 63.89 ± 0.26 | 64.76 ± 0.41 | 63.42 ± 0.51 | 62.55 ± 0.48 | ||||||
|
| CG | 11.50 ± 0.15 | 0.797 | 12.47 ± 0.25 | 0.096 | 11.01 ± 0.38 | 0.350 | 11.19 ± 0.20 | 0.207 | |
| HG | 11.44 ± 0.18 | 11.92 ± 0.21 | 10.51 ± 0.33 | 11.79 ± 0.42 | ||||||
|
| CG | 19.71 ± 0.19 | 0.513 | 20.34 ± 0.36 | 0.322 | 20.07 ± 0.51 | 0.321 | 19.36 ± 0.24 | 0.287 | |
| HG | 19.90 ± 0.23 | 20.82 ± 0.30 | 19.34 ± 0.45 | 18.76 ± 0.50 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Forehead |
| CG | 68.00 ± 0.29 | 0.109 | 67.92 ± 0.68 | 0.006 | 68.99 ± 0.78 | 0.553 | 67.73 ± 0.31 | 0.011 |
| HG | 68.74 ± 0.35 | 70.42 ± 0.57 | 68.33 ± 0.68 | 65.93 ± 0.62 | ||||||
|
| CG | 10.34 ± 0.16 | 0.585 | 11.12 ± 0.29 | 0.067 | 9.71 ± 0.41 | 0.740 | 10.13 ± 0.22 | 0.232 | |
| HG | 10.20 ± 0.19 | 10.43 ± 0.24 | 9.52 ± 0.36 | 10.73 ± 0.45 | ||||||
|
| CG | 20.48 ± 0.22 | 0.416 | 21.30 ± 0.43 | 0.243 | 20.90 ± 0.63 | 0.345 | 20.00 ± 0.27 | 0.325 | |
| HG | 20.76 ± 0.27 | 21.96 ± 0.36 | 20.04 ± 0.55 | 19.38 ± 0.56 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Cheek |
| CG | 60.70 ± 0.20 | 0.176 | 61.01 ± 0.46 | 0.713 | 61.01 ± 0.54 | 0.051 | 60.56 ± 0.25 | 0.179 |
| HG | 60.26 ± 0.25 | 60.79 ± 0.38 | 59.50 ± 0.47 | 59.79 ± 0.51 | ||||||
|
| CG | 12.19 ± 0.15 | 0.924 | 13.19 ± 0.26 | 0.240 | 11.93 ± 0.38 | 0.168 | 11.82 ± 0.20 | 0.179 | |
| HG | 12.22 ± 0.18 | 12.79 ± 0.21 | 11.18 ± 0.33 | 12.44 ± 0.41 | ||||||
|
| CG | 19.33 ± 0.18 | 0.645 | 19.82 ± 0.35 | 0.395 | 19.63 ± 0.48 | 0.332 | 19.07 ± 0.24 | 0.264 | |
| HG | 19.46 ± 0.22 | 20.21 ± 0.29 | 18.97 ± 0.42 | 18.46 ± 0.49 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Nose |
| CG | 67.71 ± 0.30 | 0.098 | 67.26 ± 0.69 | 0.006 | 69.91 ± 0.86 | 0.205 | 67.39 ± 0.31 | 0.042 |
| HG | 68.50 ± 0.37 | 69.77 ± 0.57 | 68.36 ± 0.75 | 65.92 ± 0.64 | ||||||
|
| CG | 11.81 ± 0.18 | 0.423 | 13.05 ± 0.33 | 0.034 | 10.77 ± 0.46 | 0.536 | 11.48 ± 0.25 | 0.163 | |
| HG | 11.58 ± 0.22 | 12.12 ± 0.28 | 10.36 ± 0.41 | 12.29 ± 0.51 | ||||||
|
| CG | 19.04 ± 0.20 | 0.354 | 19.96 ± 0.39 | 0.460 | 19.28 ± 0.59 | 0.505 | 18.57 ± 0.24 | 0.464 | |
| HG | 19.33 ± 0.24 | 20.35 ± 0.33 | 18.72 ± 0.52 | 18.17 ± 0.50 | ||||||
Total is the average Lab value calculated using the Lab value of three regions (forehead, cheek, and nose). SE, standard error; CG, Cold-prescription group; HG, Heat-prescription group. p < 0.05; p < 0.01. The analysis of statistical data was performed using ANCOVA. The mean and p value were adjusted by covariates (age, BMI, and systolic blood pressure).