| Literature DB >> 28883882 |
Cheng-Chan Yang1,2, Gen-Min Lin1,3,4, Jen-Hung Wang5, Hsiao-Chiang Chu1, Hsien-Tsai Wu1, Jian-Jung Chen6,7, Cheuk-Kwan Sun8.
Abstract
Using four-channel photoplethysmography (PPG) for acquiring peripheral arterial waveforms, this study investigated vascular and autonomic impacts of combined acupuncture-far infrared radiation (FIR) in improving peripheral circulation. Twenty healthy young adults aged 25.5 ± 4.6 were enrolled for 30-minute measurement. Each subject underwent four treatment strategies, including acupuncture at ST36 (Zusanli), pseudoacupuncture, FIR, and combined acupuncture-FIR at different time points. Response was assessed at 5-minute intervals. Area under arterial waveform at baseline was defined as AreaBaseline, whereas AreaStim referred to area at each 5-minute substage during and after treatment. AreaStim/AreaBaseline was compared at different stages and among different strategies. Autonomic activity at different stages was assessed using low-to-high frequency power ratio (LHR). The results demonstrated increased perfusion for each therapeutic strategy from stage 1 to stage 2 (all p < 0.02). Elevated perfusion was noted for all treatment strategies at stage 3 compared to stage 1 except pseudoacupuncture. Increased LHR was noted only in subjects undergoing pseudoacupuncture at stage 3 compared to stage 1 (p = 0.045). Reduced LHR at stage 2 compared to stage 1 was found only in combined treatment group (p = 0.041). In conclusion, the results support clinical benefits of combined acupuncture-FIR treatment in enhancing peripheral perfusion and parasympathetic activity.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28883882 PMCID: PMC5572608 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1947315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Locations of acupoints along the stomach and gallbladder meridians over the lower leg. Acupuncture performed at acupoint Zusanli (ST36) located 4 cm anterior to the gallbladder meridian. Pseudoacupoint chosen on the same horizontal plane 4 cm posterior to gallbladder meridian.
Figure 2Recording lasting for 30 minutes with the first 5 minutes being the baseline (stage 1), 5th to 20th minute being intervention phase (stage 2), and 20th to 30th minute being the recovery phase (stage 3). FIR: far-infrared radiation.
Figure 3Changes in peripheral perfusion in testing subjects (n = 20) on receiving four different treatment strategies. AreaBaseline: summation of areas under arterial waveforms within 5 minutes of baseline recording. AreaStim: summation of areas under arterial waveforms for each five-minute recording at each substage after baseline. FIR: far-infrared radiation. p < 0.02 at stage 2 versus stage 1 for each treatment strategy; †p < 0.04 at stage 3 versus Stage 1 for acupuncture, FIR, and combined treatment.
Changes in peripheral perfusion and LHR for four different treatments at different stages in the same group of testing subjects (n = 20).
| Parameter | Treatment | Stage 1 | Stage 2 |
| Stage 3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfusion (aU) | Acupuncture | 2.20 ± 0.35 | 2.33 ± 0.36 | <0.001 | 2.29 ± 0.30 | 0.001 |
| Pseudoacupuncture | 2.33 ± 0.30 | 2.41 ± 0.29 | <0.001 | 2.38 ± 0.26 | 0.069 | |
| FIR | 2.30 ± 0.31 | 2.40 ± 0.35 | 0.020 | 2.42 ± 0.37 | 0.032 | |
| Acupuncture-FIR | 2.26 ± 0.45 | 2.37 ± 0.44 | <0.001 | 2.38 ± 0.41 | 0.004 | |
|
| ||||||
| LHR | Acupuncture | 1.84 ± 1.14 | 1.64 ± 0.83 | 0.442 | 1.62 ± 0.80 | 0.306 |
| Pseudoacupuncture | 1.58 ± 0.89 | 1.80 ± 0.85 | 0.206 | 2.00 ± 1.17 | 0.045 | |
| FIR | 2.07 ± 0.97 | 1.72 ± 0.88 | 0.108 | 2.07 ± 1.89 | 0.601 | |
| Acupuncture-FIR | 2.42 ± 1.58 | 1.74 ± 0.93 | 0.041 | 2.15 ± 1.48 | 0.691 | |
aU: arbitrary unit; FIR: far-infrared radiation; LHR: low frequency power to high frequency power ratio. aComparison between stages 1 and 2. bComparison between stages 3 and 1. Significance of difference determined by paired t-test.
Figure 4(a) Changes in LHR at different stages of treatment for subjects undergoing four kinds of therapies. LHR: low frequency power to high frequency power ratio; FIR: far-infrared radiation. p = 0.041 at stage 2 versus stage 1 for subjects receiving acupuncture-FIR combined treatment; †p = 0.045 at stage 3 versus stage 1 for subjects undergoing pseudoacupuncture. Significance of difference determined by paired t-test. (b) Comparison of changes in LHR between pseudoacupuncture and acupuncture treatment. p = 0.012 determined with post hoc test; (c) comparison of changes in LHR between pseudoacupuncture and combined acupuncture-FIR treatment. †p = 0.019 determined with post hoc test.