| Literature DB >> 28883612 |
An-Sheng Lee1,2, Yutao Xi3, Chin-Hu Lai4,5, Wei-Yu Chen4, Hsien-Yu Peng1, Hua-Chen Chan6, Chu-Huang Chen7,8,9,10, Kuan-Cheng Chang11,12,13.
Abstract
Dyslipidemia is associated with greater risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to examine whether the most electronegative subfraction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), L5, is correlated with QTc prolongation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and investigate the effects of human L5 on the electrophysiological properties of cardiomyocytes in relation to the lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor (LOX-1). L5 was isolated from the plasma of 40 patients with angiography documented CAD and 13 patients with no CAD to correlate the QTc interval respectively. The mean concentration of L5 was higher and correlated with QTc in patients with CAD compared to controls. To examine the direct effect of L5 on QTc, mice were intravenously injected with L5 or L1. L5-injected wild-type but not LOX-1-/- mice showed longer QTc compared to L1-injected animals in vivo with corresponding longer action potential duration (APD) in cardiomyocytes incubated with L5 in vitro. The APD prolongation was mediated by an increase of L-type calcium current and a decrease of transient outward potassium current. We show that L5 was positively correlated with QTc prolongation in patients with ischemic heart disease. L5 can modulate cardiac repolarization via LOX-1-mediated alteration sarcolemmal ionic currents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28883612 PMCID: PMC5589822 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10503-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
| Variables | No CAD n = 13 n (%) or median (IQR) | CAD N = 40 n (%) or median (IQR) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 55.48 (50.59‒63.81) | 59.33 (48.16‒67.31) | 0.28 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 6 (46.15) | 32 (80) | 1.00 |
| Female | 7 (53.85) | 8 (20) | |
| History of | |||
| Hypertension | 5 (38.46) | 26 (65.00) | 1.00 |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 3 (23.08) | 20 (50.00) | 0.47 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 3 (23.08) | 11 (27.50) | 1.00 |
| CVD | 4 (30.77) | 27 (67.50) | 0.24 |
| CVA | 1 (7.70) | 6 (15.00) | 1.00 |
| ESRD | 2 (15.38) | 5 (12.50) | — |
| Bronchial asthma | 0 (0) | 3 (6.82) | — |
| Chronic hepatitis | 1 (7.69) | 4 (7.50) | — |
| Gout | 0 (0) | 1 (2.50) | — |
| Cancer | 2 (15.38) | 4 (10.00) | 0.32 |
| Smoking | 6 (46.15) | 28 (70.00) | 1.00 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.93 (21.87‒28.71) | 27.64 (24.57‒29.79) | 0.21 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 123.00 (118.00 ‒144.00) | 140.00 (129.00‒158.00) |
|
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.00 (70.00‒90.00) | 81.00 (73.50‒88.00) | 0.81 |
| HR (beats/min) | 80.00 (69.00‒86.00) | 75.50 (64.50‒89.00) | 0.25 |
| QT (ms) | 358.00 (350.00‒412.00) | 409.00 (379.50‒436.00) | 0.06 |
| QTc (ms) | 433.00 (402.00‒449.00) | 446.50 (429.25‒475.50) |
|
| TC (mg/dL) | 137.50 (114.75‒152.5) | 183.50 (148.25‒199.25) |
|
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 95.00 (70.50‒119.00) | 161.50 (117.00‒230.25) |
|
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 68.00 (57.00‒83.10) | 117.55 (77.48‒134.63) |
|
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 43.95 (41.13‒49.73) | 34.30 (30.88‒38.38) |
|
| L5 (mg/dL) | 0.76 (0.23‒4.38) | 2.18 (0.89‒17.75) |
|
| SGOT (IU/L) | 30.00 (23.00‒53.50) | 30.00 (18.25‒43.75) | 0.38 |
| SGPT (IU/L) | 19.00 (16.25‒26.50) | 25.00 (14.50‒40.00) | 0.60 |
| BUN (mg/dL)a | 16.00 (14.00‒21.00) | 15.00 (12.00‒20.00) | 0.42 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL)a | 0.97 (0.78‒1.00) | 0.99 (0.82‒1.23) | 0.26 |
| Sodium (meq/L) | 137.00 (136.00‒140.00) | 137.00 (136.00‒139.00) | 0.25 |
| Potassium (meq/L) | 3.70 (3.50‒3.70) | 3.80 (3.58‒4.20) | 0.13 |
| Ischemic heart disease | |||
| STEMI | 0 (0) | 11 (27.50) | — |
| Non STEMI | 0 (0) | 9 (22.50) | — |
| Unstable angina | 0 (0) | 4 (10.00) | — |
| Stable angina/chest pain | 13 (100) | 16 (40.00) | — |
| PCI | 0 (0) | 26 (65.00) | — |
| Drugs with known TdP riska | 0 (0) | 1 (2.50) | — |
| Drugs with possible TdP riska | 0 (0) | 0 (0.00) | — |
| Drugs with conditional TdP riska | 0 (0) | 1 (2.50) | — |
CAD, coronary artery disease; IQR, interquartile range; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVA, cardiovascular accident; ESRD, end-stage renal disease, BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure, DBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, heart rate; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; L5, the most electronegative subfraction of LDL; SGOT, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; SGPT, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TdP, torsades de pointes; aaccording to the Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (http://www.azcert.org/).
Figure 1Correlation between L5 and corrected QT interval in humans. (a) Representative electrocardiogram shows longer corrected QT interval (QTc) in patient with higher L5 (upper) and shorter QTc in that with lower L5 (lower). (b) QTc was plotted against L5 concentration in patients with normal coronary artery (left) and CAD (right).
Figure 2L5 induces prolongation of action potential duration in cardiomyocytes through LOX-1. (a) Representative action potentials of 30 μg/mL L1 or L5-treated cardiomyocytes from wild-type mice and L5-treated cardiomyocytes from LOX-1−/− mice. The horizontal line indicates zero voltage level. (b) Comparison of the action potential duration at 25% (APD25), 50% (APD50), 75% (APD75), and 90% (APD90) repolarization between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. (c) Comparison of the action potential amplitude (APA) and the resting membrane potential (RMP) between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. n = 6 per group. ***P < 0.01 vs. L1-treated cardiomyocytes; ### P < 0.01 vs. L5-treated cardiomyocytes.
Figure 3L5 increases L-type calcium current (I Ca) in cardiomyocytes through LOX-1. (a) The original superimposed recordings of inward L-type calcium current in 30 μg/mL L1 or L5-treated cardiomyocytes from wild-type mice and L5-treated cardiomyocytes from LOX-1−/− mice. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (b) Schematic diagram of the voltage clamp protocol. (c) Comparison of the I-V relationships of I (Ca) between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. n = 6 per group. **P < 0.02 and ***P < 0.01 vs. L1-treated cardiomyocytes; # P < 0.05 and ### P < 0.01 vs. L5-treated cardiomyocytes.
Figure 4Kinetic change of ICa in L5-treated cardiomyocytes. (a) Schematic diagram of the voltage clamp protocol of steady-state voltage-dependence inactivation. (b) The original superimposed recordings of steady-state inactivation trace in 30 μg/mL L1 or L5-treated cardiomyocytes from wild-type mice and L5-treated cardiomyocytes from LOX-1−/− mice. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (c) The voltage-dependent steady-state inactivation curves for I Ca were obtained by normalizing the current amplitudes to the maximal value and plotted as a function of the prepulse (conditioning) potentials. The lines drawn through the data points are the best fit to the Boltzmann equation. (d) Histogram comparing slope and midpoint voltage (V0.5) of each line between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. (e) Schematic of the typical 2-pulse protocol of kinetics of I Ca recovery from inactivation. (f) The original superimposed recordings of recovery from inactivation in 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (g) The recovery from inactivation curves for I Ca were obtained and fitted to a single exponential function. (h) Histogram comparing the average time constant (τ) for recovery from inactivation between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. n = 6 per group. *P < 0.05 vs. L1-treated cardiomyocytes; # P < 0.05 vs. L5-treated cardiomyocytes.
Figure 5L5 decreases transient outward potassium current (I to) in cardiomyocytes through LOX-1. (a) The original superimposed recordings of outward potassium current in 30 μg/mL L1 or L5-treated cardiomyocytes from wild-type mice and L5-treated cardiomyocytes from LOX-1−/− mice. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (b) Schematic diagram of the voltage clamp protocol. (c) Comparison of the I-V relationships of I to between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. n = 6 per group. **P < 0.02 and ***P < 0.01 vs. L1-treated cardiomyocytes; ### P < 0.01 vs. L5-treated cardiomyocytes.
Figure 6Kinetic change of Ito in L5-treated cardiomyocytes. (a) Schematic diagram of the voltage clamp protocol of steady-state voltage-dependence inactivation. (b) The original superimposed recordings of steady-state inactivation trace in 30 μg/mL L1 or L5-treated cardiomyocytes from wild-type mice and L5-treated cardiomyocytes from LOX-1−/− mice. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (c) The voltage-dependent steady-state inactivation curves for I to were obtained by normalizing the current amplitudes to the maximal value and plotted as a function of the prepulse (conditioning) potentials. The lines drawn through the data points are the best fit to the Boltzmann equation. (d) Histogram comparing slope and midpoint voltage (V0.5) of each line between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. (e) Schematic of the typical 2-pulse protocol of kinetics of I to recovery from inactivation. (f) The original superimposed recordings of recovery from inactivation in 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (g) The recovery from inactivation curves for I to were obtained and fitted to a single exponential function. (h) Histogram comparing the average time constant (τ) for recovery from inactivation between 3 groups of cardiomyocytes. n = 6 per group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.02 vs. L1-treated cardiomyocytes; # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.02 vs. L5-treated cardiomyocytes.
Figure 7L5 decreases human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium current (IKr) through LOX-1 in HEK293 cells. (a) The original superimposed recordings of hERG potassium tail current in 30 μg/mL L1 or L5-treated human embryonic kidney cells transfected with hERG channel. The anti-human monoclonal LOX-1 antibody, TS92 (10 μg/mL) was used to block the LOX-1-dependent effect, and the selective hERG channel blocker E4031 (30 nM) was used as positive control. The arrow in each panel indicates zero current level. (b) Schematic diagram of the voltage clamp protocol. (c) Comparison of the I-V relationships of I Kr between 4 groups of cells. n = 5 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.02, and ***P < 0.01 vs. L1-treated cells; # P < 0.05 vs. L5-treated cells.