Literature DB >> 28882754

Mini-review: Far peripheral vision.

Michael J Simpson1.   

Abstract

The region of far peripheral vision, beyond 60 degrees of visual angle, is important to the evaluation of peripheral dark shadows (negative dysphotopsia) seen by some intraocular lens (IOL) patients. Theoretical calculations show that the limited diameter of an IOL affects ray paths at large angles, leading to a dimming of the main image for small pupils, and to peripheral illumination by light bypassing the IOL for larger pupils. These effects are rarely bothersome, and cataract surgery is highly successful, but there is a need to improve the characterization of far peripheral vision, for both pseudophakic and phakic eyes. Perimetry is the main quantitative test, but the purpose is to evaluate pathologies rather than characterize vision (and object and image regions are no longer uniquely related in the pseudophakic eye). The maximum visual angle is approximately 1050, but there is limited information about variations with age, race, or refractive error (in case there is an unexpected link with the development of myopia), or about how clear cornea, iris location, and the limiting retina are related. Also, the detection of peripheral motion is widely recognized to be important, yet rarely evaluated. Overall, people rarely complain specifically about this visual region, but with "normal" vision including an IOL for >5% of people, and increasing interest in virtual reality and augmented reality, there are new reasons to characterize peripheral vision more completely.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Far peripheral vision; Intraocular lenses; Negative dysphotopsia; Perimetry; Peripheral vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882754     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Distinct differences in anterior chamber configuration and peripheral aberrations in negative dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Luc van Vught; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Temporal Visual Field Border.

Authors:  Jan Lestak; Tomas Lestak; Martin Fus; Iva Klimesova
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-03

3.  The Value of Static Perimetry in the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Negative Dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Lisa R W Rozendal; Luc van Vught; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  'The last channel': vision at the temporal margin of the field.

Authors:  P Veto; P B M Thomas; P Alexander; T A Wemyss; J D Mollon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Seven Myths on Crowding and Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-19

Review 6.  A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Matteo Valsecchi; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.