Literature DB >> 28882373

A paradigm shift in surgical planning and simulation using 3Dgraphy: Experience of first 50 surgeries done using 3D-printed biomodels.

Vaibhav Bagaria1, Kshitij Chaudhary2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative planning is an important aspect of any orthopedic surgery. Traditionally, surgeons mentally rehearse the operation and anticipate problems based on data available from "radiography" like MRI and CT. 3D printed bio-models and tools, or "3Dgraphy" can simplify this mental exercise and provide a realistic and user-friendly portrayal of this radiographic data.
METHODS: Five surgeons participated in this multicenter study. 3D printed biomodels were obtained for 50 surgical cases that included periarticular trauma (24), pelvic trauma (11), complex primary (7), and revision arthroplasty (8). CT scan data was used to generate computer models which were then 3D printed in real size. These models were used to understand pathoanatomy and conduct simulated surgery as a part of preoperative planning. The models were sterilized and were used for intraoperative referencing. Following each case, the operating surgeon was asked to fill out a structured questionnaire to report on the perceived benefits of these tools.
RESULTS: All surgeons reported that the biomodels provided additional information to conventional imaging that enhanced their knowledge of the complex pathoanatomy. It was useful in preoperative planning, rehearsing the operation, surgical simulation, intraoperative referencing, surgical navigation, preoperative implant selection, and inventory management. This probably reduced surgical time and improved accuracy of the surgery. All surgeons reported that they would not only use it themselves but also recommend it to other surgeons.
CONCLUSION: 3Dgraphy was found to be a valuable tool in orthopedic surgeries that involve complex pathoanatomy like pelvic trauma, revision arthroplasty, and periarticular fracture. As the technology evolves and improves, they are likely to become a standard component of many orthopedic procedures.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; 3dGraphy; Acetabular fractures; Complex fractures; Preoperative planning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882373     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  18 in total

1.  [3D Slicer : Universal 3D visualization software].

Authors:  Nico Bruns
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Utku Kandemir; Binfei Zhang; Chen Fei; Yan Zhuang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  [3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery].

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Nico Bruns; S Razaeian; J D Clausen; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Pre-operative planning and templating with 3-D printed models for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Venkateshwar Reddy Maryada; Praharsha Mulpur; Krishna Kiran Eachempati; Adarsh Annapareddy; Vemaganti Badri Narayana Prasad; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  Comparison of 3D printed anatomical model qualities in acetabular fracture representation.

Authors:  David A Salazar; Justin Cramer; Nicholas W Markin; Nathaniel H Hunt; Gabe Linke; Justin Siebler; Jorge Zuniga
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

Review 6.  3D printing- creating a blueprint for the future of orthopedics: Current concept review and the road ahead!

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Rakesh Bhansali; Prashant Pawar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 7.  3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: A technological marvel.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Mohit Kumar Patralekh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 8.  Setting Up 3D Printing Services for Orthopaedic Applications: A Step-by-Step Guide and an Overview of 3DBioSphere.

Authors:  Darshil Shah; Lokesh Naik; Bhawan Paunipagar; Darshana Rasalkar; Kshitij Chaudhary; Vaibhav Bagaria
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis.

Authors:  Michael A Bohl; Sarah McBryan; Peter Nakaji; Steve W Chang; Jay D Turner; U Kumar Kakarla
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

10.  Traditional versus mirror three-dimensional printing technology for isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 25 months.

Authors:  Kai Xiao; Bo Xu; Lin Ding; Weiguang Yu; Lei Bao; Xinchao Zhang; Meiji Chen; Xiangzhen Liu; Huanyi Lin; Tengfei Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.