Literature DB >> 28882372

Reduced survival for uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty after operatively treated acetabular fractures.

John Clarke-Jenssen1, Marianne Westberg2, Olav Røise3, Stein Arne Øvre Storeggen4, Tone Bere2, Ingunn Silberg2, Jan Erik Madsen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post traumatic arthritis and avascular necrosis of the femoral head are common complications after operatively treated acetabular fractures. This may cause severe disabilities for the patient, necessitating a total hip arthroplasty. Even though an arthroplasty may provide good symptomatic relief, the long-term results are more uncertain and no consensus exists according to preferred prosthetic designs. With this cohort study, we aimed to investigate the medium to long term arthroplasty survival and clinical results of total hip arthroplasty after operatively treated acetabular fractures.
METHODS: We included 52 patients treated with a secondary total hip arthroplasty at a median of 2.4 (0.1-14.1) years after an operatively treated acetabular fracture. The median age was 54 (11-82) years. Cemented arthroplasty was used for 33 patients, 10 patients had an uncemented arthroplasty and 9 patients received a hybrid arthroplasty. Average follow up was 8.0 (SD 5.0) years.
RESULTS: Ten-year revision free arthroplasty survival was 79%. Uncemented arthroplasties had a significantly worse 10-year survival of 57%. Arthroplasties performed at a centre without a pelvic fracture service also had a significantly worse 10-years survival of 51%. Cox regression showed similar results with an 8-fold increase in risk of revision for both uncemented arthroplasties and operations performed at a non-pelvic trauma centre.
CONCLUSION: Total hip arthroplasty secondary to an operatively treated acetabular fracture provides good symptomatic relief. These patients are, however, complex cases and are probably best treated at specialist centres with both pelvic trauma surgeons and arthroplasty surgeons proficient in complex revisions present.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular fractures; Joint survival; Open reduction and internal fixation; Total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882372     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  2 in total

1.  Long-term survival after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty for treatment of acute femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study with a mean 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Meiji Chen; Weiguang Yu; Xiulan Han; Junxing Ye; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Cemented versus uncemented total hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, multicentre study with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Shuai Mao; Baomin Chen; Ying Zhu; Liang Qian; Jinluan Lin; Xinchao Zhang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.