Literature DB >> 28882352

Adult Spinal Deformity: National Trends in the Presentation, Treatment, and Perioperative Outcomes From 2003 to 2010.

Peter G Passias1, Cyrus M Jalai2, Nancy Worley2, Shaleen Vira2, Bryan Marascalchi2, Shearwood McClelland2, Virginie Lafage3, Thomas J Errico2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective database.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery outcome trends on a nationwide scale using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2010.
METHODS: ASD patients ≥25 years from 2003 to 2010 in the NIS undergoing anterior, posterior, or combined surgical approaches were included. Fractures, 9+ levels fused, or any cancer were excluded. Patient demographics, hospital data, and procedure-related complications were evaluated. Yearly trends were analyzed using univariate analysis and linear regression modeling.
RESULTS: Of 10,966 discharges, 1,952 were anterior, 6,524 were posterior, and 1,106 were combined. The total surgical ASD volume increased by 112.5% (p = .029), and both the average patient age (p < .001) and number of patients >65 years old significantly increased from 2003 to 2010 (p = .009). Anterior approach case volume decreased by 13.7% (p = .019), whereas that of combined increased by 22.7% (p = .047). Posterior case volume increased by 38.9% from 2003 to 2010, though insignificantly (p = .084). Total hospital charges for all approaches increased over the interval (p < .001). Total length of stay for all approaches decreased over the time interval (p < .005). Although the overall morbidity for all approaches increased by 22.7% (p < .001), mortality did not change (p = .817). The most common morbidities in 2003 were hemorrhagic anemia, accidental cut, puncture, perforation, or laceration during a procedure, and device-related complications, which persisted in 2010 with the exception of increased acute respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: For ASD surgery from 2003 to 2010, the volume of anterior approaches decreased, whereas posterior procedures did not change, and combined approaches increased. Total hospital charges increased for all considered procedures, length of hospital stay decreased, whereas operative patients were increasingly elderly, and more procedures were observed for patients >65 years old. For all approaches, morbidity increased whereas mortality did not change. Future study is required to develop methods to reduce morbidity and costs, thereby optimizing patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Hospital characteristics; Morbidity; Mortality; National trends

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882352     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  9 in total

1.  A Simpler, Modified Frailty Index Weighted by Complication Occurrence Correlates to Pain and Disability for Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cole A Bortz; Katherine E Pierce; Haddy Alas; Avery Brown; Dennis Vasquez-Montes; Sara Naessig; Waleed Ahmad; Bassel G Diebo; Tina Raman; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Aaron J Buckland; Michael C Gerling; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

2.  Reaching the medicare allowable threshold in adult spinal deformity surgery: multicenter cost analysis comparing actual direct hospital costs versus what the government will pay.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Gum; Breton Line; Leah Y Carreon; Richard A Hostin; Samrat Yeramaneni; Steven D Glassman; Douglas L Burton; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames; R Shay Bess
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  Combined anterior-posterior versus all-posterior approaches for adult spinal deformity correction: a matched control study.

Authors:  Sleiman Haddad; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Çaglar Yilgor; Susana Nuñez-Pereira; Manuel Ramirez; Javier Pizones; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstuck; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  COVID-19 Significantly Impacted Hospital Length of Stay and Discharge Patterns for Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

Authors:  Kevin Y Wang; Emmanuel L McNeely; Suraj A Dhanjani; Micheal Raad; Varun Puvanesarajah; Brian J Neuman; David Cohen; Akhil J Khanna; Floreana Kebaish; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Management of severe adult spinal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgical strategies without posterior column osteotomies: a 13-year experience.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Alisa Alayan; Christopher Kong; Sheila Kahwaty; Babak Khandehroo; David Gendelberg; Andrew Chung
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-03-25

6.  Strategies for spinal surgery reimbursement: bundling in the working-age population.

Authors:  Michael K Dalton; Christer Mjåset; Adoma Manful; Melvin D Helgeson; William Wynn-Jones; Zara Cooper; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Trends in Intraoperative Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Survey of Spine Surgeons in the United States.

Authors:  David M Gullotti; Amir H Soltanianzadeh; Saki Fujita; Miguel Inserni; Edward Ruppel; Nicholas G Franconi; Corinna Zygourakis; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Daniel M Sciubba; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04

8.  Supine Imaging Is a Superior Predictor of Long-Term Alignment Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Charles Elysee; Francis Lovecchio; Renaud Lafage; Bryan Ang; Alex Huang; Mathieu Bannwarth; Han Jo Kim; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-25

9.  Risk Factors of Clostridium Difficile Infection After Spinal Surgery: National Health Insurance Database.

Authors:  Sahyun Sung; Ji-Won Kwon; Soo-Bin Lee; Hwan-Mo Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Byung Ho Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.