Literature DB >> 28882336

Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes and Readmission Rates in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Between Systemic and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (from the National Readmission Database).

Shilpkumar Arora1, Sidakpal S Panaich2, Nitesh Ainani3, Varun Kumar4, Nileshkumar J Patel5, Byomesh Tripathi4, Purav Shah4, Nirali Patel6, Sopan Lahewala7, Abhishek Deshmukh2, Apurva Badheka8, Cindy Grines9.   

Abstract

There are sparse comparative data on in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who receive systemic thrombolytics versus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Database 2013 to 2014, subset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systemic and CDT were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions and secondary outcome was combined in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage. We used propensity score match analysis without replacement using Greedy's algorithm to adjust for possible confounders. We identified a total of 4,426 patients (3,107: systemic thrombolysis and 1,319: CDT) with acute PE who were treated with thrombolysis. In our 2:1 propensity score algorithm, in-hospital mortality was lower in the CDT group (6.12%) versus systemic thrombolytics (14.94%) (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.49, p <0.001). There was also a lower composite secondary outcome (in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage) in patients who received CDT (8.42%) versus those who received systemic thrombolytics (18.13%) (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.53, p <0.001). Thirty-day readmission was lower in patients with CDT group (7.65%) compared with systemic thrombolytics (10.58%, p = 0.009). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality, as well as bleeding during primary admission was significantly lower with CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics for patients with acute PE. There was also significant decrease in rate of readmissions among patients receiving CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882336     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  Catheter directed compared to systemically delivered thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed K Pasha; Muhammad Umer Siddiqui; Muhammad Danial Siddiqui; Adnan Ahmed; Ammar Abdullah; Irbaz Riaz; M Hassan Murad; Haraldur Bjarnason; Waldemar E Wysokinski; Robert D McBane
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Advances in Percutaneous Management of Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Jimmy Kerrigan; Michael Morse; Elias Haddad; Elisabeth Willers; Chand Ramaiah
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Cost-effectiveness microsimulation of catheter-directed thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism using a right ventricular function model.

Authors:  Stefanie E Mason; Jinyi Zhu; Farbod N Rahaghi; George R Washko; Ankur Pandya
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Immediate and late impact of reperfusion therapies in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Luca Valerio; Frederikus A Klok; Stefano Barco
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 5.  Endovascular therapies for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Hervé Rousseau; Costantino Del Giudice; Olivier Sanchez; Emile Ferrari; Marc Sapoval; Pierre Marek; Clément Delmas; Charline Zadro; Paul Revel-Mouroz
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 6.  Progress in interventional radiology treatment of pulmonary embolism: A brief review.

Authors:  Alessandro Posa; Pierluigi Barbieri; Giulia Mazza; Alessandro Tanzilli; Roberto Iezzi; Riccardo Manfredi; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-28

7.  Outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. standard medical therapy in patients with acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Stephen D'Auria; Ahmet Sezer; Floyd Thoma; Michael Sharbaugh; Jeffrey McKibben; Robert Maholic; Efthymios D Avgerinos; Belinda N Rivera-Lebron; Catalin Toma
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.017

8.  How to manage thromboembolic risk in patient with SARS-CoV-2-related disease in the Emergency Department: A case report of cardiogenic shock due to massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  L Colombo; A Macheda; D Gentile; F Panizzardi; S Pierini; C Codazzi; L Meloni; F Bianchi; G Santangelo
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-12

9.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis to treat acute pulmonary thrombosis in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Authors:  Laura Pendower; Giulia Benedetti; Karen Breen; Narayan Karunanithy
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.