Literature DB >> 28882212

Diet Composition and Trophic Ecology of Northeast Pacific Ocean Sharks.

Joseph J Bizzarro1, Aaron B Carlisle2, Wade D Smith3, Enric Cortés4.   

Abstract

Although there is a general perception of sharks as large pelagic, apex predators, most sharks are smaller, meso- and upper-trophic level predators that are associated with the seafloor. Among 73 shark species documented in the eastern North Pacific (ENP), less than half reach maximum lengths >200cm, and 78% occur in demersal or benthic regions of the continental shelf or slope. Most small (≤200cm) species (e.g., houndsharks) and demersal, nearshore juveniles of larger species (e.g., requiem sharks) consume small teleosts and decapod crustaceans, whereas large species in pelagic coastal and oceanic environments feed on large teleosts and squids. Several large, pelagic apex predator species occur in the ENP, but the largest species (i.e., Basking Shark, Whale Shark) consume zooplankton or small nekton. Size-based dietary variability is substantial for many species, and segregation of juvenile and adult foraging habitats also is common (e.g., Horn Shark, Shortfin Mako). Temporal dietary differences are most pronounced for temperate, nearshore species with wide size ranges, and least pronounced for smaller species in extreme latitudes and deep-water regions. Sympatric sharks often occupy various trophic positions, with resource overlap differing by space and time and some sharks serving as prey to other species. Most coastal species remain in the same general region over time and feed opportunistically on variable prey inputs (e.g., season migrations, spawning, or recruitment events), whereas pelagic, oceanic species actively seek hot spots of prey abundance that are spatiotemporally variable. The influence of sharks on ecosystem structure and regulation has been downplayed compared to that of large teleosts species with higher per capita consumption rates (e.g., tunas, billfishes). However, sharks also exert indirect influences on prey populations by causing behavioural changes that may result in restricted ranges and reduced fitness. Except for food web modelling efforts in Alaskan waters, the trophic impacts of sharks are poorly incorporated into current ecosystem approaches to fisheries management in the NEP.
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological Impacts; Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management (EBFM); Feeding behaviour; Foraging Movements; Standardized diet composition; Trophic levels

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882212     DOI: 10.1016/bs.amb.2017.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mar Biol        ISSN: 0065-2881            Impact factor:   5.143


  3 in total

1.  Distribution and population structure of the smooth-hound shark, Mustelus mustelus (Linnaeus, 1758), across an oceanic archipelago: Combining several data sources to promote conservation.

Authors:  Fernando Espino; José Antonio González; Néstor E Bosch; Francisco J Otero-Ferrer; Ricardo Haroun; Fernando Tuya
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Trophic position of Otodus megalodon and great white sharks through time revealed by zinc isotopes.

Authors:  Jeremy McCormack; Michael L Griffiths; Sora L Kim; Kenshu Shimada; Molly Karnes; Harry Maisch; Sarah Pederzani; Nicolas Bourgon; Klervia Jaouen; Martin A Becker; Niels Jöns; Guy Sisma-Ventura; Nicolas Straube; Jürgen Pollerspöck; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Robert A Eagle; Thomas Tütken
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  A multi-tasking stomach: functional coexistence of acid-peptic digestion and defensive body inflation in three distantly related vertebrate lineages.

Authors:  P Ferreira; G T Kwan; S Haldorson; J L Rummer; F Tashiro; L F C Castro; M Tresguerres; J M Wilson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.703

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.