Literature DB >> 28882030

Outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Pentafecta and Trifecta achievements.

Seyed B Jazayeri1, Brittany Weissman1, David B Samadi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional and oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy play a major role in patient satisfaction after treatment. This study was designed to assess the functional and oncologic outcome after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a single surgeon series of patients.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy in a referral academic center was queried for functional and oncologic outcome. Patients undergoing RARP between 2010 and 2013 were included. Analysis was performed with SPSS and SAS, χ2, Mann-Whitney and t-test were used when appropriate.
RESULTS: Overall, 566 patients were included in the analysis. The Trifecta and Pentafecta was 73.9% and 64.1%, respectively. Patients achieving Pentafecta were younger (P<0.001), had lower PSA level (P=0.04), lower Biopsy Gleason (P<0.01), lower risk prostate cancer (P<0.01) and fewer comorbidities (P=0.03). The patients were followed up for a median of 27.4 months in Trifecta and 20.6 months in Pentafecta group. At 12-month follow-up the continence and potency rate was 90.6% and 84.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative counseling for RARP surgery using Pentafecta criteria offers more precise information and reasonable expectations than using the Trifecta, further research is required to prepare a standard reporting outline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882030     DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02909-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol        ISSN: 0393-2249            Impact factor:   3.720


  6 in total

1.  Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.

Authors:  Luca Afferi; Marco Moschini; Philipp Baumeister; Stefania Zamboni; Julian Cornelius; Gallus Ineichen; Agostino Mattei; Livio Mordasini
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A comparative study of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy among men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single institution study.

Authors:  Simone Sforza; Antonio Andrea Grosso; Fabrizio Di Maida; Lorenzo Viola; Agostino Tuccio; Andrea Mari; Gianmartin Cito; Andrea Cocci; Marco Carini; Andrea Minervini; Lorenzo Masieri
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-21

3.  A Preliminary Study of PSMA Fluorescent Probe for Targeted Fluorescence Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Haoxi Zhou; Yachao Liu; Xiaojun Zhang; Kuang Chen; Yuan Li; Xiaodan Xu; Baixuan Xu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI with integrated multiparametric MRI for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sascha Kaufmann; Stephan Kruck; Sergios Gatidis; Tobias Hepp; Wolfgang M Thaiss; Jörg Hennenlotter; Johannes Schwenck; Marcus Scharpf; Konstantin Nikolaou; Arnulf Stenzl; Gerald Reischl; Christian la Fougère; Jens Bedke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Do Kyung Kim; Hyun Kyu Ahn; Hae Do Jung; Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Development and internal validation of preoperative and postoperative nomograms predicting quadrifecta outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gopal Sharma; Danny Darlington; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.