Literature DB >> 28880994

Live long and prosper: plant-soil feedback, lifespan, and landscape abundance covary.

Andrew Kulmatiski1, Karen H Beard1, Jeanette M Norton2, Justin E Heavilin3, Leslie E Forero1, Josephine Grenzer1.   

Abstract

Plant soil feedbacks (PSFs) are thought to be important to plant growth and species coexistence, but most support for these hypotheses is derived from short-term greenhouse experiments. Here we use a seven-year, common garden experiment to measure PSFs for seven native and six nonnative species common to the western United States. We use these long-term, field-based estimates to test correlations between PSF and plant landscape abundance, species origin, functional type, and lifespan. To assess potential PSF mechanisms, we also measured soil microbial community composition, root biomass, nitrogen cycling, bulk density, penetration resistance, and shear strength. Plant abundance on the landscape and plant lifespan were positively correlated with PSFs, though this effect was due to the relationships for native plants. PSFs were correlated with indices of soil microbial community composition. Soil nutrient and physical traits and root biomass differed among species but were not correlated with PSF. While results must be taken with caution because only 13 species were examined, these species represent most of the dominant plant species in the system. Results suggest that native plant abundance is associated with the ability of long-lived plants to create positive plant-soil microbe interactions, while short-lived nonnative plants maintain dominance by avoiding soil-borne antagonists, increasing nitrogen cycling and dedicating resources to aboveground growth and reproduction rather than to belowground growth. Broadly, results suggest that PSFs are correlated with a suite of traits that determine plant abundance.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  common garden; exotic; field experiment; nonnative species; nutrient plant-soil feedback; physical plant-soil feedback; semiarid; shrub-steppe; soil DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28880994     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

1.  The temporal development of plant-soil feedback is contingent on competition and nutrient availability contexts.

Authors:  Petr Dostál
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Shoot and root insect herbivory change the plant rhizosphere microbiome and affects cabbage-insect interactions through plant-soil feedback.

Authors:  Julia Friman; Peter N Karssemeijer; Julian Haller; Kris de Kreek; Joop J A van Loon; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 10.323

3.  The effects of plant-soil feedback on invasion resistance are soil context dependent.

Authors:  Pengdong Chen; Qiaoqiao Huang; Yanhui Zhuge; Chongwei Li; Ping Zhu; Yuping Hou
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Community-level plant-soil feedbacks explain landscape distribution of native and non-native plants.

Authors:  Andrew Kulmatiski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Fungal diversity regulates plant-soil feedbacks in temperate grassland.

Authors:  Marina Semchenko; Jonathan W Leff; Yudi M Lozano; Sirgi Saar; John Davison; Anna Wilkinson; Benjamin G Jackson; William J Pritchard; Jonathan R De Long; Simon Oakley; Kelly E Mason; Nicholas J Ostle; Elizabeth M Baggs; David Johnson; Noah Fierer; Richard D Bardgett
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.