Keely Marshall1, Junfei Jin1,2,3, Carl Atkinson1,4, Ali Alawieh1, Fei Qiao1, Biao Lei1, Kenneth D Chavin5, Songqing He1,6, Stephen Tomlinson1,7. 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 2. Laboratory of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China. 3. China-USA Lipids in Health and Disease Research Center, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Surgery, Lee Patterson Allen Transplant Immunobiology Laboratory, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 5. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH. 6. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China. 7. Ralph H. Johnson Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC.
Abstract
Complement plays a role in both hepatic ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury (IRI) and liver regeneration, but it is not clear how complement is activated in either process. We investigated the role of self-reactive immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in activating complement after hepatic IR and liver resection. Natural IgM antibodies that recognize danger-associated molecular patterns (neoepitopes) activate complement following both hepatic IR and liver resection. Antibody-deficient Rag1-/- mice were protected from hepatic IRI, but had increased hepatic injury and an impaired regenerative response after 70% partial hepatectomy (PHx). We identified two IgM monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that specifically reversed the effect of Rag1 deficiency in both models; B4 (recognizes Annexin IV) and C2 (recognizes subset of phospholipids). Focusing on the B4-specific response, we demonstrated sinusoidal colocalization of IgM and C3d in Rag1-/- mice that were reconstituted with B4 mAb, and furthermore that the Annexin IV neoepitope is specifically and similarly expressed after both hepatic IR and PHx in wild-type (WT) mice. A single-chain antibody construct (scFv) derived from B4 mAb blocked IgM binding and reduced injury post-IR in WT mice, although, interestingly, B4scFv did not alter regeneration post-PHx, indicating that anti-Annexin IV antibodies are sufficient, but not necessary, for the regenerative response in the context of an entire natural antibody repertoire. We also demonstrated expression of the B4 neoepitope in postischemic human liver samples obtained posttransplantation and a corollary depletion in IgM recognizing the B4 and C2 neoepitopes in patient sera following liver transplantation. Conclusion: These data indicate an important role for IgM in hepatic IRI and regeneration, with a similar cross-species injury-specific recognition system that has implications for the design of neoepitope targeted therapeutics. (Hepatology 2018;67:721-735).
Complement plays a role in both hepatic ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury (IRI) and liver regeneration, but it is not clear how complement is activated in either process. We investigated the role of self-reactive immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in activating complement after hepatic IR and liver resection. Natural IgM antibodies that recognize danger-associated molecular patterns (neoepitopes) activate complement following both hepatic IR and liver resection. Antibody-deficient Rag1-/- mice were protected from hepatic IRI, but had increased hepatic injury and an impaired regenerative response after 70% partial hepatectomy (PHx). We identified two IgM monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that specifically reversed the effect of Rag1 deficiency in both models; B4 (recognizes Annexin IV) and C2 (recognizes subset of phospholipids). Focusing on the B4-specific response, we demonstrated sinusoidal colocalization of IgM and C3d in Rag1-/- mice that were reconstituted with B4 mAb, and furthermore that the Annexin IV neoepitope is specifically and similarly expressed after both hepatic IR and PHx in wild-type (WT) mice. A single-chain antibody construct (scFv) derived from B4 mAb blocked IgM binding and reduced injury post-IR in WT mice, although, interestingly, B4scFv did not alter regeneration post-PHx, indicating that anti-Annexin IV antibodies are sufficient, but not necessary, for the regenerative response in the context of an entire natural antibody repertoire. We also demonstrated expression of the B4 neoepitope in postischemic human liver samples obtained posttransplantation and a corollary depletion in IgM recognizing the B4 and C2 neoepitopes in patient sera following liver transplantation. Conclusion: These data indicate an important role for IgM in hepatic IRI and regeneration, with a similar cross-species injury-specific recognition system that has implications for the design of neoepitope targeted therapeutics. (Hepatology 2018;67:721-735).
Authors: Carl Atkinson; Fei Qiao; Xiaofeng Yang; Peng Zhu; Nicholas Reaves; Liudmila Kulik; Martin Goddard; V Michael Holers; Stephen Tomlinson Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N Baumgarth; O C Herman; G C Jager; L Brown; L A Herzenberg; L A Herzenberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael S Haas; Elisabeth M Alicot; Franziska Schuerpf; Isaac Chiu; Jinan Li; Francis D Moore; Michael C Carroll Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Alexei V Tumanov; Ekaterina P Koroleva; Peter A Christiansen; Mehtab A Khan; Matthew J Ruddy; Byron Burnette; Salvatore Papa; Guido Franzoso; Sergei A Nedospasov; Yang-Xin Fu; Robert A Anders Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Amelia Clark; Alexander Weymann; Eric Hartman; Yumirle Turmelle; Michael Carroll; Joshua M Thurman; V Michael Holers; Dennis E Hourcade; David A Rudnick Journal: Mol Immunol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 4.407
Authors: Liudmila Kulik; Sherry D Fleming; Chantal Moratz; Jason W Reuter; Aleksey Novikov; Kuan Chen; Kathy A Andrews; Adam Markaryan; Richard J Quigg; Gregg J Silverman; George C Tsokos; V Michael Holers Journal: J Immunol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Christoph W Strey; Maciej Markiewski; Dimitrios Mastellos; Ruxandra Tudoran; Lynn A Spruce; Linda E Greenbaum; John D Lambris Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Yumiko Imai; Keiji Kuba; G Greg Neely; Rubina Yaghubian-Malhami; Thomas Perkmann; Geert van Loo; Maria Ermolaeva; Ruud Veldhuizen; Y H Connie Leung; Hongliang Wang; Haolin Liu; Yang Sun; Manolis Pasparakis; Manfred Kopf; Christin Mech; Sina Bavari; J S Malik Peiris; Arthur S Slutsky; Shizuo Akira; Malin Hultqvist; Rikard Holmdahl; John Nicholls; Chengyu Jiang; Christoph J Binder; Josef M Penninger Journal: Cell Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Lufang Liu; Caodi Fang; Whitney Fu; Bo Jiang; Guangxin Li; Lingfeng Qin; Jacob Rosenbluth; Gavin Gong; Catherine B Xie; Peter Yoo; George Tellides; Jordan S Pober; Dan Jane-Wit Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Yuhuan Luo; Dania Brigham; Joseph Bednarek; Richard Torres; Dong Wang; Sara Ahmad; Cara L Mack Journal: Hepatology Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 17.425