Literature DB >> 28880401

Reduced number of CD169+ macrophages in pre-metastatic regional lymph nodes is associated with subsequent metastatic disease in an animal model and with poor outcome in prostate cancer patients.

Kerstin Strömvall1, Kristoffer Sundkvist1,2, Börje Ljungberg2, Sofia Halin Bergström1, Anders Bergh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor-derived antigens are captured by CD169+ (SIGLEC1+ ) sinus macrophages in regional lymph nodes (LNs), and are presented to effector cells inducing an anti-tumor immune response. Reduced CD169 expression in pre-metastatic regional LNs is associated with subsequent metastatic disease and a poor outcome in several tumor types, but if this is the case in prostate cancer has not been explored.
METHODS: CD169 expression was measured with immunohistochemistry in metastasis-free regional LNs from 109 prostate cancer patients treated with prostatectomy (January 1996 to April 2002). Possible associations of CD169 expression with PSA-relapse, prostate cancer death, Gleason score, and other clinical data were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival- and Cox regression analysis. In addition, the Dunning rat prostate tumor model was used to examine CD169 expression in pre-metastatic LNs draining either highly metastatic MatLyLu- or poorly metastatic AT1-tumors.
RESULTS: In patients with low CD169 immunostaining in metastasis-free regional LNs, 8 of the 27 patients died from prostate cancer compared with only three of the 82 patients with high immunostaining (P < 0.001). CD169 expression in regional LNs was not associated with PSA-relapse. Rats with highly metastatic tumors had decreased CD169 immunoreactivity in pre-metastatic regional LNs compared with rats with poorly metastatic tumors.
CONCLUSION: Low expression of CD169 in metastasis-free regional LNs indicates a reduced anti-tumor immune response. If verified in other studies, CD169 expression in regional LNs could, in combination with other factors, potentially be used as a marker of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
© 2017 The Authors. The Prostate Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dunning rat prostate tumors; SIGLEC1; immunohistochemistry; prostate cancer death; tumor-draining lymph nodes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28880401      PMCID: PMC5656907          DOI: 10.1002/pros.23407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


INTRODUCTION

Metastatic prostate tumors secrete factors that precondition, not only the tumor stroma but also the remaining benign parts of the prostate, in ways that facilitate subsequent tumor growth and spread.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 If metastatic prostate tumors secrete factors that also prepare regional lymph nodes (LNs) for metastatic growth is only limitedly explored. Such pre‐metastatic niches have been shown to exist in various organs, including regional LNs, in other tumor types.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 For example, tumors with high metastatic capacity suppress anti‐tumor immune responses in LNs prior to metastatic colonization.9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 In tumor‐free regional LNs from prostate cancer patients, an increased number of cells expressing VEGFR1,18, 19 and IL‐3020 have been shown to predict subsequent metastatic disease after radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, tumor‐free LNs from prostate cancer patients contained more CD68+ and pSTAT3+ myeloid cells than LNs form individuals without prostate cancer.13 LNs containing prostate cancer metastases showed signs of immunosuppression and were smaller than normal, and these responses probably occurred prior to the arrival of metastatic cells.21 Collectively, this suggests that examination of regional LNs could give information on tumor aggressiveness that could potentially aid in the choice of therapy. We recently compared the global gene expression in tumor‐draining LNs from rats implanted with two different orthotopic tumors − the poorly metastatic AT1tumors and the highly metastatic MatLyLu (MLL)‐tumors.5 The gene expression profile in pre‐metastatic MLL‐LNs was associated with decreased antigen presentation, increased immunosuppression, and a reduced density of T lymphocytes.5, 22 One gene with lower expression in pre‐metastatic MLL‐LNs was Cd169 (Siglec1) (fold change −1.7, P = 0.01 vs LNs from treatment naive animals, and fold change −1.5, P = 0.08 vs AT1‐LNs).5 CD169 is normally expressed by subsets of macrophages in secondary lymphoid organs, for example, by subcapsular‐ and medullary sinus macrophages in LNs.23 By capturing and presenting tumor‐derived antigens, subcapsular sinus macrophages promote anti‐tumor immune responses and could in this way retard tumor growth and spread.23, 24, 25, 26, 27 A high density of CD169+ macrophages in tumor‐free regional LNs was associated with a favorable prognosis in melanoma, colorectal‐, and endometrial cancer.24, 27, 28, 29 The aim of this study was to examine CD169 expression in pre‐metastatic LNs in more detail, both in the animal model and in prostate cancer patients. We demonstrate that rats implanted with highly metastatic prostate tumors have reduced numbers of CD169+ macrophages in tumor‐draining LNs compared with rats implanted with less metastatic tumors. In prostate cancer patients, reduction of CD169 expression in regional LNs was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer death in patients treated with prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

The local ethical committee for animal research approved all of the animal work (permit number A42‐15). The methods used for the animal experiments in this study have previously been used, and described.22 Briefly, poorly metastatic AT1‐ and highly metastatic MLL‐ Dunning rat prostate tumor cells30 were purchased from European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC, Salisbury, UK. MLL #94101454, AT1 #94101449) and were cultured as previously described.5 Immunocompetent and syngeneic adult Copenhagen rats (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were used in all experiments. Animals were anesthetized and 2 × 104 AT1 cells, or 1 × 103 MLL cells (suspended in 10 μL RPMI 1640) were carefully injected into one of the ventral prostate lobes as earlier described.5 Rats were sacrificed 3 (n = 8/treatment), and 10 days (n = 8/treatment) after tumor cell injection. The tumor‐containing prostates and the tumor‐draining regional LNs were removed, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored in −80°C. Tissues from treatment‐naïve rats (n = 8) and from vehicle‐injected rats (n = 10) were used as controls.

Patients

From Pathology archives at Umeå University Hospital we retrieved samples from 109 patients operated with radical prostatectomy between January 1996 and April 2002—and where the regional LNs (right and left obturatorius area) were also sampled. The tumor specimens were Gleason graded, and pathological stage and surgical margin status was determined. Gleason scores ranged from 6 (3 + 3) to 9 (4 + 5) and from stage pT2 (n = 45) to pT3 (n = 64), all cases were free from regional LN metastases (pN0). Pre‐operative PSA levels and outcome data, in particular post‐operative PSA, PSA nadir value, dates of PSA‐relapse, detected bone metastases (bone scan), initiation of additional therapy, and cancer specific death, were retrieved from National Prostate Cancer Registry31 and patient records. Time from surgery to PSA‐relapse and time from surgery to death caused by prostate cancer was calculated. This study did not take into consideration which treatment the patients received after relapse. PSA‐relapse was defined as an increase above nadir or, for patients with undetectable PSA (below 0.1 ng/mL) after surgery, when PSA was above 0.2 ng/mL. PSA‐relapse was detected in 43 patients (39%) and in nine of them metastases were also detected with bone scan. Living status was classified as either dead or alive, and for living patients with PSA‐relapse or without PSA‐relapse. At the end of 2016, 11 patients in this study had died from prostate cancer and 20 from other causes. The ethical review board in Umeå approved the study (dnr 2010/366‐31M).

Immunohistochemistry

Four micron thick cryosections from rat regional LNs were fixed in formalin and immunostained using a mouse monoclonal anti‐rat CD169 antibody (diluted 1:100, #LS‐C124538, LSBio, Seattle, WA). The immunoreaction was detected using Mouse‐on‐rat HRP‐polymer (#MRT621, Biocare Pacheco, CA) and visualized using diaminobenzidine (Dako Glostrup, Denmark). The volume density of CD169+ cells was quantified by stereology. Using a light microscope equipped with a square‐lattice in the eyepiece, the fraction of grid‐intersections falling on CD169+ cells and reference space was counted.32 Five micron thick sections from paraffin embedded human LNs were stained with a primary mouse monoclonal antibody against human CD169 (diluted 1:25, sc53442, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). The immunoreaction was detected using Vectastain ABC‐kit (Vector labs, Burlingame, CA) and then visualized using diaminobenzidine (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). As most patients had bilateral cancer foci, we assessed at least two LNs from each patient taken both from the left and right side. CD169 immunostaining was scored as either high (seen in most cases) or low (markedly reduced) by an experienced uropathologist (AB). LNs from the same patient had a similar staining pattern in the majority of patients and were in these cases evaluated together. In cases with heterogeneous staining, LNs were graded as having a low CD169 score if 50% or more of the LNs had absent or very low staining. At the time of scoring, the uropathologist was unaware of disease outcome. In order to examine the robustness of the staining and scoring procedure, tissue from all patients were sectioned, stained and scored twice, and the second score was compared to the first.

Statistical analysis

Fisher's exact test was used to compare CD169 staining score in relation to disease outcome in different patient subgroups. Possible association of CD169 staining and time to PSA‐relapse or time to prostate cancer death was assessed using Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis, and the log‐rank test was used to test for differences in survival distributions. The prognostic value of the CD169 score alone, and compared to traditional prognostic markers—such as pre‐operative PSA, PSA nadir, PSA‐relapse, tumor Gleason score, ISUP Gleason grade group,33 tumor stage, and surgical margins was examined by Cox regression analysis. The CD169 score from the animal experiment is presented as mean ± SD, and Mann‐Whitney U test was used when comparing groups. All statistics was computed in SPSS software (SPSS statistics 23, IBM, Armonk, NY), and a P‐value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Growth of metastatic PC in rats in relation to CD169+ macrophages in pre‐metastatic lymph nodes

To examine if the volume density of CD169+ macrophages were affected in regional LNs prior to metastasis we used a rat prostate tumor model.30 Highly metastatic MLL cells or poorly metastatic AT1 cells were injected into the prostate and the regional LNs (MLL‐LNs and AT1‐LNs) were examined 3 and 10 days post‐injection. LNs from vehicle‐injected rats were used as controls (vehicle‐LNs). Detailed information about the tumors and LNs used in this study can be found in Strömvall et al.22 Briefly, the size of AT1tumors was similar to the size of MLL‐tumors at both day 3 and day 10. The first microscopically visible LN‐metastases in the MLL‐model were seen at 14 days post‐injection. AT1 rarely metastasize, however LN‐metastases have been seen occasionally, and the earliest at 28 days post‐injection. The weight of the ventral prostate was unaffected in vehicle‐injected rats compared to that in treatment‐naïve rats. However, abdominal surgery and vehicle injection increased the weight of the regional LNs. A similar increase in LN weight was also seen in animals with AT1‐ and MLL‐tumors. LNs from vehicle‐injected rats were therefore used as controls in this study. The density of CD169+ macrophages was similar in all three groups at day 3 post‐injection (Figure 1). At day 10, the density of CD169+ macrophages was lower in MLL‐LNs compared to both AT1‐ and vehicle‐LNs (Figure 1), suggesting a reduction of CD169+ macrophages in tumor‐draining LNs prior to metastatic growth.
Figure 1

CD169 (brown) immunostaining of regional lymph nodes (LN) from rats with prostate cancer. (A) Volume density of CD169+ macrophages in regional LNs at 3 and 10 days post‐injection of vehicle, AT1‐, or MLL‐tumor cells into the prostate. Bars represent mean ± SD, n = 8‐10 animals/group, *P < 0.05, Mann‐Whitney U test. (B) Representative pictures of CD169 immunostaining of tumor‐draining regional LNs at day 10 post‐injection of AT1‐, or MLL‐tumor cells

CD169 (brown) immunostaining of regional lymph nodes (LN) from rats with prostate cancer. (A) Volume density of CD169+ macrophages in regional LNs at 3 and 10 days post‐injection of vehicle, AT1‐, or MLL‐tumor cells into the prostate. Bars represent mean ± SD, n = 8‐10 animals/group, *P < 0.05, Mann‐Whitney U test. (B) Representative pictures of CD169 immunostaining of tumor‐draining regional LNs at day 10 post‐injection of AT1‐, or MLL‐tumor cells

CD169 expression in relation to prostate cancer death

To evaluate the clinical significance of CD169 in prostate cancer, LN tissue from 109 patients treated with radical prostatectomy was analyzed with immunohistochemistry and scored as having either low or high CD169 expression (Figure 2).
Figure 2

CD169 (brown) immunostaining of regional lymph nodes from prostate cancer patients. Representative pictures of low (upper panel) or high (lower panel) CD169 score

CD169 (brown) immunostaining of regional lymph nodes from prostate cancer patients. Representative pictures of low (upper panel) or high (lower panel) CD169 score In most patients, CD169+ macrophages were observed in the subcapsular‐ and medullary sinuses of the LNs (Figure 2). However, in 27 patients the CD169 staining was markedly reduced or absent (Figure 2). In the group with low CD169 score, eight patients (30%) died due to prostate cancer, while in the group with high CD169 score, only three patients (3.7%) died of prostate cancer (P = 0.001, Table 1). We therefore further explored the CD169 score and other factors known to be associated with prostate cancer outcome (Table 1). High PSA nadir, PSA‐relapse, high Gleason score, and high ISUP Gleason grade group was significantly related to prostate cancer death (Table 1).
Table 1

CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to prostate cancer death

Prostate cancer death
No (mean ± SD)Yes (mean ± SD)MWU test, P‐value
Pre‐operative PSA9.3 ± 4.411 ± 6.80.310
Gleason score6.7 ± 0.787.3 ± 0.790.024
No (n) Yes (n) Total (n) Fisher's exact test, P‐value
CD169 score
Low19827
High79382
Total98111090.001
Pre‐operative PSA
≤1072678
>1026531
Total98111090.288
PSA‐nadir
≤0.188694
>0.110515
Total98111090.007
PSA‐relapse
No651* 66
Yes331043
Total9811109<0.001
ISUP Gleason grade group
Low (ISUP 1‐2)84690
High (ISUP 3‐5)14519
Total98111090.022
Tumor stage
pT243245
pT355964
Total98111090.119
Surgical margins
Positive36743
Negative62466
Total98111090.108

MWU = Mann‐Whitney U; SD = Standard Deviation.

Notably one patient died from prostate cancer without documented PSA‐relapse. The diagnosis was in this case verified by autopsy and histological verification of prostate cancer liver metastases.

CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to prostate cancer death MWU = Mann‐Whitney U; SD = Standard Deviation. Notably one patient died from prostate cancer without documented PSA‐relapse. The diagnosis was in this case verified by autopsy and histological verification of prostate cancer liver metastases. In the Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis, patients with low CD169 score had a significantly shorter survival time than patients with high CD169 score. The estimated mean survival time for those having a low CD169 score was 200 (95%CI 178‐221) months, while for those with a high CD169score it was 232 (95%CI 226‐239) months (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis showing cumulative cancer specific survival of patients with either high or low CD169 score. Patients with low CD169 score had a significantly shorter survival time than patients with high CD169 score, P = 0.002, log‐rank test

Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis showing cumulative cancer specific survival of patients with either high or low CD169 score. Patients with low CD169 score had a significantly shorter survival time than patients with high CD169 score, P = 0.002, log‐rank test To further assess the significance of CD169 score compared to the other clinically established markers for prognosis, uni‐ and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed. In univariable analysis, low CD169 score, Gleason score, high ISUP Gleason grade group, high PSA nadir, and PSA‐relapse, were all related to increased risk of prostate cancer death (Table 2). In multivariable stepwise elimination analysis, only CD169 score and PSA‐relapse remained significantly associated with an increased risk of dying from prostate cancer (Table 2).
Table 2

Cox regression analysis of CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to prostate cancer death

Variable n RR95%CI P‐value
Univariable analysis
CD169 score**
High821*
Low276.61.7‐25.10.006
Gleason score
6‐101093.11.3‐7.20.010
Pre‐operative PSA**
≤10781*
>10312.30.7‐7.50.180
PSA‐nadir**
≤0.1941*
>0.1154.81.5‐15.80.010
PSA‐relapse**
No661*
Yes43131.7‐101.70.015
ISUP Gleason grade group**
Low (ISUP 1‐2)901*
High (ISUP 3‐5)193.71.1‐12.10.031
Tumor stage**
pT2451*
pT3643.50.8‐16.10.111
Surgical margins**
Negative661*
Positive4330.9‐10.10.084
Multivariable analysis, stepwise elimination
Step 1
CD169 score** low vs high4.81.1‐21.30.038
Gleason score (6‐10)3.20.6‐16.20.162
Pre‐operative PSA** >10 vs ≤100.50.1‐2.70.424
PSA‐nadir** >0.1 vs ≤0.14.40.9‐22.60.076
PSA‐relapse** yes vs no5.30.5‐57.50.168
ISUP Gleason grade group** 3‐5 vs 1‐21.10.2‐8.10.924
Tumor stage** pT3 vs pT23.30.4‐31.10.293
Surgical margins** positive vs negative0.40.05‐3.90.451
Step 7
CD169 score** low vs high4.81.3‐18.50.022
PSA‐relapse** yes vs no10.01.3‐79.20.029

RR = relative risk; CI = confidence interval.

Reference value.

Categorical variable.

Cox regression analysis of CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to prostate cancer death RR = relative risk; CI = confidence interval. Reference value. Categorical variable.

CD169 expression in relation to PSA‐relapse

We tested if the CD169 score was associated to PSA‐relapse and compared the result with established prognostic markers of PSA‐relapse (Table 3). In line with multiple previous studies, pre‐operative PSA, PSA nadir, tumor Gleason score, ISUP Gleason grade group, tumor stage, and positive surgical margins, were all related to the risk of PSA‐ relapse, but CD169 score was not (Table 3).
Table 3

CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to PSA‐relapse

PSA‐relapse
No (mean ± SD)Yes (mean ± SD)MWU test, P‐value
Pre‐operative PSA8.4 ± 3.910.9 ± 5.40.014
Gleason score6.5 ± 0.777.1 ± 0.66<0.001
No (n) Yes (n) Total (n) Fisher's exact test, P‐value
CD169 score
Low131427
High532982
Total66431090.173
Pre‐operative PSA
≤10532578
>10131831
Total66431090.017
PSA‐nadir
≤0.1633194
>0.131215
Total66431090.001
ISUP Gleason grade group
Low (ISUP 1–2)622890
High (ISUP 3‐5)41519
Total6643109< 0.001
Tumor stage
pT236945
pT3303464
Total66431090.001
Surgical margins
Positive172643
Negative491766
Total66431090.001

MWU = Mann‐Whitney U; SD = Standard Deviation.

CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to PSA‐relapse MWU = Mann‐Whitney U; SD = Standard Deviation. As CD169 expression appeared more strongly related to prostate cancer death than to PSA‐relapse, we grouped patient with PSA‐relapse into those that died from prostate cancer and those who did not (Table 4). In patients with PSA‐relapse, a low CD169 score was associated to an increased risk of dying from prostate cancer compared to those with a high CD169 score (Table 4). Interestingly, in patients with PSA‐relapse, only CD169 score was related to prostate cancer death.
Table 4

CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to prostate cancer death within the subgroup of patients with PSA‐relapse

Prostate cancer death
No (mean ± SD)Yes (mean ± SD)MWU test, P‐value
Pre‐operative PSA10.6 ± 5.012.1 ± 6.50.580
Gleason score7.1 ± 0.617.3 ± 0.820.380
No (n)Yes (n)Total (n)Fisher's exact test, P‐value
CD169 score
Low7714
High26329
Total3310430.007
Pre‐operative PSA
≤1020525
>1013518
Total3310430.717
PSA‐nadir
≤0.126531
>0.17512
Total3310430.110
ISUP Gleason grade group
Low (ISUP 1‐2)23528
High (ISUP 3‐5)10515
Total3310430.281
Tumor stage
pT2729
pT326834
Total3310431.00
Surgical margins
Positive19726
Negative14317
Total3310430.714

MWU = Mann‐Whitney U; SD = Standard Deviation.

CD169 score and traditional prognostic markers in relation to prostate cancer death within the subgroup of patients with PSA‐relapse MWU = Mann‐Whitney U; SD = Standard Deviation.

Robustness of CD169 staining and scoring

All lymph nodes were sectioned, stained, and scored twice without knowledge of the previous result. In total, the scoring differed in nine out of 110 cases. Eight low cases were re‐classified as high and one case initially scored high was re‐scored as low. Among the 11 patients dying from prostate cancer, one case with low score was re‐scored as high. This suggests that the scoring was relatively robust (Kendal Tau correlation coefficient 0.74) but also that sensitivity of the staining method may shift between staining sessions. Using the first or second data set in the statistical analysis gave the same general result. The reported results are calculated based on the first data set.

DISCUSSION

The principal observation in this paper is that reduced CD169 expression in tumor‐draining LNs is associated to aggressive prostate cancer. Highly metastatic rat prostate tumors induced down‐regulation of CD169 expression in pre‐metastatic regional LNs. In prostate cancer patients, a low number of CD169+ macrophages in metastasis‐free regional LNs was significantly associated to an increased risk of prostate cancer associated death. Metastatic cancers suppress anti‐tumor immune responses in regional LNs prior to metastasis.8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 24 In line with this, the global gene expression in regional LNs from rats carrying highly metastatic MLL‐prostate tumors indicated increased immunosuppression and reduced antigen presentation prior to metastasis.5 Cd169 (Siglec1) mRNA expression was shown to be decreased in highly metastatic MLL‐ versus poorly metastatic AT1‐LNs.5 Consistent with the previous study, we now demonstrate that this is accompanied by a reduced number of CD169+ macrophages in MLL‐LNs. In lymph nodes, CD169 is normally expressed by macrophages in the subcapsular‐ and medullary sinuses.23 One function of the subcapsular sinus‐macrophages is to capture lymph borne particles, including tumor‐derived antigens and exosomes.25, 26, 34 Antigens sampled by the CD169+ macrophages are presented to effector cells like T‐cells and NK‐cells, which migrate to the tumor where they promote an anti‐tumor immune response.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 35 In breast cancer, the density of CD169+ cells in regional LNs correlated with clinical stage, and also with numbers of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in high grade tumors, but was not associated to cancer specific survival.36 In our experimental model, we found that rats carrying poorly metastatic AT1tumors had a higher density of CD169+ macrophages in the tumor‐draining LNs and in a previous study we also found a higher amount of tumor‐infiltrating CD3+ T‐cells,5 compared with rats carrying highly metastatic MLL‐tumors. Similarly, high levels of CD169+ cells in regional LNs correlated with high numbers of cytotoxic CD8+ T‐cells in melanoma, colon, and endometrial tumors, and this was associated with a favorable clinical outcome.24, 27, 28, 29 Our observation that highly metastatic rat prostate cancers down‐regulated CD169 expression in regional LNs, and that a low expression of CD169 in regional LNs from prostate cancer patients was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer death, are thus in line with the known biological role of CD169+ sinus macrophages. PSA‐relapse occurs in a substantial number of men treated for prostate cancer, but in many cases this is not associated with clinical relapse and prostate cancer death.37 Among patients with PSA‐relapse, pre‐operative PSA, tumor grade, tumor stage, and positive surgical margins could not predict death in prostate cancer. However, in this group of patients, low levels of CD169 in regional LNs—a marker that can be measured already at the time of surgery—was related to an increased risk of prostate cancer death. This suggests that patients with systemic metastases (detected by raising PSA levels) hypothetically can be separated into two groups, one with an effective immune surveillance and another with a less effective immune response. The CD169 expression in regional LNs could be one marker of this difference in immune response. In our previous studies we found several immune‐related genes, in addition to Cd169, to be differentially expressed comparing pre‐metastatic MLL‐LNs to AT1‐LNs at different time points, for example, Cd3, Cd8a, Clec1b, Ctla4, Foxp3, Ido1, Il4, Il10, Il1r2, Lag3, Pla2g7, and Tgfb1.5, 22 Further studies should therefore explore whether these factors could be differentially expressed in pre‐metastatic LNs also in patients and if this difference is related to patient outcome. It is also of interest to examine whether other factors in pre‐metastatic LNs already found to predict prognosis in patients, like VEGFR1,18, 19 IL‐30,20 pSTAT3+ macrophages,13 and lymph node size,21 can be used in combination with CD169. The reason why some tumors induce a decrease in numbers of CD169+ macrophages in regional LNs is unknown, but tumor‐derived factors could be involved.23, 25, 26, 27 CSF1, a survival factor for CD169+ macrophages, was down‐regulated in regional LNs from rats with highly metastatic MLL‐tumors, suggesting that CSF1 could be involved.5 Tumor‐derived exosomes is one key factor adapting pre‐metastatic sites to the subsequent arrival and growth of neoplastic cells.8, 11, 15, 38 Effects of tumor‐derived exosomes on regional LNs have not been examined in our model system. However, MLL‐derived exosomes injected into the prostate precondition it for accelerated growth of low‐malignant prostate cancer cells implanted 3 days later.3 It is likely that MLL‐exosomes also could influence the tumor‐draining LNs in a similar tumor‐promoting way. One limitation of this study is the low number of patients examined. This makes our study underpowered to prove a robust relation between low CD169 expression and increased risk of prostate cancer death. Nevertheless, our data suggest that CD169 expression in pre‐metastatic regional LNs could be used, together with other markers, to evaluate prostate tumor aggressiveness. This however needs to be validated in larger studies using standardized staining and quantification methods. Evaluation of CD169 expression could be done either prior to choice of primary therapy, or to determine the need and choice of additional therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

In animals, and in patients with localized prostate cancer, reduced density of CD169+ sinus macrophages in pre‐metastatic regional LNs appear to be associated with subsequent metastatic colonization and a poor outcome.
  37 in total

Review 1.  CD169+ macrophages at the crossroads of antigen presentation.

Authors:  Luisa Martinez-Pomares; Siamon Gordon
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 16.687

2.  CD44v6 dependence of premetastatic niche preparation by exosomes.

Authors:  Thorsten Jung; Donatello Castellana; Pamela Klingbeil; Ines Cuesta Hernández; Mario Vitacolonna; David J Orlicky; Steve R Roffler; Pnina Brodt; Margot Zöller
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  S1PR1-STAT3 signaling is crucial for myeloid cell colonization at future metastatic sites.

Authors:  Jiehui Deng; Yong Liu; Heehyoung Lee; Andreas Herrmann; Wang Zhang; Chunyan Zhang; Shudan Shen; Saul J Priceman; Maciej Kujawski; Sumanta K Pal; Andrew Raubitschek; Dave S B Hoon; Stephen Forman; Robert A Figlin; Jie Liu; Richard Jove; Hua Yu
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Presence of prostate cancer metastasis correlates with lower lymph node reactivity.

Authors:  Philippe Olivier Gannon; Mona Alam Fahmy; Louis Réal Bégin; Audrey Djoukhadjian; Abdelali Filali-Mouhim; Réjean Lapointe; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Fred Saad
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 expression in pelvic lymph nodes predicts the risk of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Fujita; Masashi Nakayama; Yasutomo Nakai; Hitoshi Takayama; Kazuo Nishimura; Takeshi Ujike; Kensaku Nishimura; Katsuyuki Aozasa; Akihiko Okuyama; Norio Nonomura
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 6.  From tumor lymphangiogenesis to lymphvascular niche.

Authors:  Satoshi Hirakawa
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 7.  Tumor lymphangiogenesis and melanoma metastasis.

Authors:  Matthias Rinderknecht; Michael Detmar
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  The metastatic niche: adapting the foreign soil.

Authors:  Bethan Psaila; David Lyden
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche.

Authors:  Rosandra N Kaplan; Rebecca D Riba; Stergios Zacharoulis; Anna H Bramley; Loïc Vincent; Carla Costa; Daniel D MacDonald; David K Jin; Koji Shido; Scott A Kerns; Zhenping Zhu; Daniel Hicklin; Yan Wu; Jeffrey L Port; Nasser Altorki; Elisa R Port; Davide Ruggero; Sergey V Shmelkov; Kristian K Jensen; Shahin Rafii; David Lyden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Sialoadhesin - a macrophage-restricted marker of immunoregulation and inflammation.

Authors:  Alexander S G O'Neill; Timo K van den Berg; Gregory E D Mullen
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.397

View more
  13 in total

1.  PD-L1 expression in regional lymph nodes and predictable roles in anti-cancer immune responses.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Komohara; Mamoru Harada; Koji Ohnishi; Keiichiro Kumamoto; Toshiyuki Nakayama
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hematop       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 2.  Reprogramming of sentinel lymph node microenvironment during tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Yen-Liang Li; Wen-Chun Hung
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 12.771

Review 3.  The intriguing roles of Siglec family members in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Kui-Ying Jiang; Li-Li Qi; Fu-Biao Kang; Ling Wang
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  High-grade tumours promote growth of other less-malignant tumours in the same prostate.

Authors:  Sofia Halin Bergström; Stina Rudolfsson; Marie Lundholm; Andreas Josefsson; Pernilla Wikström; Anders Bergh
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Co-localization of CD169+ macrophages and cancer cells in lymph node metastases of breast cancer patients is linked to improved prognosis and PDL1 expression.

Authors:  Frida Björk Gunnarsdottir; Nathalie Auoja; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Lisa Rydén; Mårten Fernö; Karin Leandersson
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  Six Immune Associated Genes Construct Prognostic Model Evaluate Low-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Yin Qiu Tan; Yun Tao Li; Teng Feng Yan; Yang Xu; Bao Hui Liu; Ji An Yang; Xue Yang; Qian Xue Chen; Hong Bo Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  CD169 Expression on Lymph Node Macrophages Predicts in Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Keiichiro Kumamoto; Takashi Tasaki; Koji Ohnishi; Michihiko Shibata; Shohei Shimajiri; Masaru Harada; Yoshihiro Komohara; Toshiyuki Nakayama
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Highly aggressive rat prostate tumors rapidly precondition regional lymph nodes for subsequent metastatic growth.

Authors:  Kerstin Strömvall; Marie Lundholm; Elin Thysell; Anders Bergh; Sofia Halin Bergström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Oncogenic role of miR‑183‑5p in lung adenocarcinoma: A comprehensive study of qPCR, in vitro experiments and bioinformatic analysis.

Authors:  Rong-Quan He; Li Gao; Jie Ma; Zu-Yun Li; Xiao-Hua Hu; Gang Chen
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 10.  The pre-metastatic niche in lymph nodes: formation and characteristics.

Authors:  Lionel Gillot; Louis Baudin; Loïc Rouaud; Frédéric Kridelka; Agnès Noël
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.