Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Stop this waste of people, animals and money.

× No keyword cloud information.

7 in total

1. Who's afraid of peer review?

Authors: John Bohannon
Journal: Science Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 47.728

2. Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publications.

Authors: Fleur T van de Wetering; Rob J P M Scholten; Tamara Haring; Michael Clarke; Lotty Hooft
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3. Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trials.

Authors: Monica Taljaard; Andrew D McRae; Charles Weijer; Carol Bennett; Stephanie Dixon; Julia Taleban; Zoe Skea; Martin P Eccles; Jamie C Brehaut; Allan Donner; Raphael Saginur; Robert F Boruch; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-05-11

4. 'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.

Authors: Cenyu Shen; Bo-Christer Björk
Journal: BMC Med Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 8.775

5. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.

Authors: Larissa Shamseer; David Moher; Onyi Maduekwe; Lucy Turner; Virginia Barbour; Rebecca Burch; Jocalyn Clark; James Galipeau; Jason Roberts; Beverley J Shea
Journal: BMC Med Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 8.775

6. Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies.

Authors: David Baker; Katie Lidster; Ana Sottomayor; Sandra Amor
Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 8.029

7. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors: Matthew J Page; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Margaret Sampson; Andrea C Tricco; Ferrán Catalá-López; Lun Li; Emma K Reid; Rafael Sarkis-Onofre; David Moher
Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 11.069

7 in total

42 in total

Stop this waste of people, animals and money.

1. Who's afraid of peer review?

2. Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publications.

Review 3. Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trials.

4. 'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.

5. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.

6. Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies.

7. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.

1. Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware.

2.

3. Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases.

4. Predatory Journals-A Looming Menace.

Review 5. Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research.

6. How predatory journals leak into PubMed.

7. Predatory journals: Research that isn't read doesn't exist.

Review 8. Publishing in black and white: the relevance of listing of scientific journals.

9. Open Centres for Journalology in Universities and Institutions.

10. Open Access Journals in Ophthalmology and Vision Science: All That Glitters Is Not Gold.