M Memon1, J Kay1, L Ginsberg2, N Simunovic3, K Bak4, P Lapner5, O R Ayeni6. 1. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Life Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 4. Sports Clinic, Aleris-Hamlet Parken, Oester Alle 42, 2nd Floor, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 6. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University Medical Centre, McMaster University, 1200 Main St West, 4E15, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. ayenif@mcmaster.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically assess the arthroscopic management of suprascapular neuropathy, including the aetiology, surgical decision-making, clinical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. METHODS: Three databases [PubMed, Ovid (Medline), and Embase] were searched. Systematic literature screening and data abstraction was performed in duplicate to present a review of studies reporting on arthroscopic management of suprascapular neuropathy. The quality of the included studies was assessed using level of evidence and the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) checklist. RESULTS: In total, 40 studies (17 case reports, 20 case series, 2 retrospective comparative studies, and 1 prospective comparative study) were identified, including 259 patients (261 shoulders) treated arthroscopically for suprascapular neuropathy. The most common aetiology of suprascapular neuropathy was suprascapular nerve compression by a cyst at the spinoglenoid notch (42%), and the decision to pursue arthroscopic surgery was most commonly based on the results of clinical findings and investigations (47%). Overall, 97% of patients reported significant improvement in or complete resolution of their pre-operative symptoms (including pain, strength, and subjective function of the shoulder) over a mean follow-up period of 23.7 months. Further, there was a low overall complication rate (4%) associated with the arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: While most studies evaluating arthroscopic management of suprascapular neuropathy are uncontrolled studies with lower levels of evidence, results indicate that such management provides patients with significant improvements in pain, strength, and subjective function of the shoulder, and has a low incidence of complications. Patients managed arthroscopically for suprascapular neuropathy may expect significant improvements in pain, strength, and subjective function of the shoulder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically assess the arthroscopic management of suprascapular neuropathy, including the aetiology, surgical decision-making, clinical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. METHODS: Three databases [PubMed, Ovid (Medline), and Embase] were searched. Systematic literature screening and data abstraction was performed in duplicate to present a review of studies reporting on arthroscopic management of suprascapular neuropathy. The quality of the included studies was assessed using level of evidence and the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) checklist. RESULTS: In total, 40 studies (17 case reports, 20 case series, 2 retrospective comparative studies, and 1 prospective comparative study) were identified, including 259 patients (261 shoulders) treated arthroscopically for suprascapular neuropathy. The most common aetiology of suprascapular neuropathy was suprascapular nerve compression by a cyst at the spinoglenoid notch (42%), and the decision to pursue arthroscopic surgery was most commonly based on the results of clinical findings and investigations (47%). Overall, 97% of patients reported significant improvement in or complete resolution of their pre-operative symptoms (including pain, strength, and subjective function of the shoulder) over a mean follow-up period of 23.7 months. Further, there was a low overall complication rate (4%) associated with the arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: While most studies evaluating arthroscopic management of suprascapular neuropathy are uncontrolled studies with lower levels of evidence, results indicate that such management provides patients with significant improvements in pain, strength, and subjective function of the shoulder, and has a low incidence of complications. Patients managed arthroscopically for suprascapular neuropathy may expect significant improvements in pain, strength, and subjective function of the shoulder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.
Authors: Lance E Leclere; Lewis L Shi; Albert Lin; Paul Yannopoulos; Laurence D Higgins; Jon J P Warner Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Vijay B Vad; Daniel Southern; Russell F Warren; David W Altchek; David Dines Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Marta Montané-Blanchart; Maribel Miguel-Pérez; Lourdes Rodero-de-Lamo; Ingrid Möller; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Carlo Martinoli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yoshihiro Katsuura; Katherine Yao; Eric Chang; Tareck A Kadrie; John A Dorizas Journal: Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-06-22