| Literature DB >> 28879466 |
Justyna Nawrocka1, U Małolepsza2, K Szymczak3, M Szczech4.
Abstract
In the present study, the spread of Rhizoctonia solani-induced disease was limited when cucumber plants were pretreated with Trichoderma atroviride TRS25. The systemic disease suppression was related to TRS25-induced resistance (TISR) induction with simultaneous plant growth promotion. Protection of cucumber was related to enhanced activity of defense enzymes, e.g., guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), syringaldazine peroxidase (SPX), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) as well as phenolic (PC) concentration increases in the conditions of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation, resulting in thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) decrease. Moreover, the obtained results indicated that TISR might depend on accumulation of salicylic acid derivatives, that is methyl salicylate (MeSA), ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS), salicylic acid glucosylated conjugates (SAGC), and β-cyclocitral as well as volatile organic compounds (VOC) such as Z-3-hexanal, Z-3-hexenol, and E-2-hexenal. The results point to important, not previously documented, roles of these VOC in TISR signaling with up-regulation of PR1 and PR5 gene characteristic of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and of PR4 gene, marker of induced systemic resistance (ISR). The study established that TRS25 enhanced deposition of callose and lignin in specialized plant cells, which protected vascular system in cucumber shoots and roots as well as assimilation cells and dermal tissues in shoots and leaves. These compounds protected cucumber organs against R. solani influence and made them more flexible and resilient, which contributed to better nutrition and hydration of plants. The growth promotion coupled with systemic mobilization of biochemical and mechanical strengthening might be involved in multilayer protection of cucumber against R. solani activated by TRS25.Entities:
Keywords: Callose; Genes; Lignin; Rhizoctonia solani; Trichoderma; Volatile compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28879466 PMCID: PMC5756291 DOI: 10.1007/s00709-017-1157-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protoplasma ISSN: 0033-183X Impact factor: 3.356
Gene-specific primer pairs used in the qRT-PCR experiment
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5′-TGGTCACTGCAACCCTGACA-3′ | 5′-AGTGGCCTGGAATCCGACT-3′ | Alizadeh et al. |
|
| 5′-AATGGATCCATGGCTAAGTTGCTTCCATC-3′ | 5′-AATGAATTCAATACACACGATTTAGCACC-3′ | Hwangbo et al. |
|
| 5′-TGCTCAACAATATGCGAACC-3′ | 5′-TCATCCACCCACAACTGAAC-3′ | Alizadeh et al. |
|
| 5′-CATTCTGCCTTTGTGCTTTTTC-3′ | 5′-ATTGATCGTCACGGTCTCGCC-3′ | Liu et al. |
| Reference gene | |||
| | 5′-CACCAAGCCCAAGAAGATC-3′ | 5′-TAAACCTAATCACCACCAGC-3′ | Wan et al. |
| | 5′-ACGCTGTTGGTGGTGGTAC-3′ | 5′-GAGAGGGGTAAACAGTGAATC-3′ | Wan et al. |
Fig. 1Suppression of R. solani-induced disease spreading on cucumber roots, shoots, and leaves by TRS25. Irregular brown lesions and rot symptoms on the roots of Rs plants were followed by shoot and leaf dark brown blight blotches and plant collapse. Abbreviations: Rs plants, TRS25 nontreated, inoculated with R. solani; TRS25 + Rs plants, TRS25 pretreated, inoculated with R. solani
Fig. 2Rating of disease caused by R. solani (a) and effect of R. solani and TRS25 treatments on cucumber shoot fresh weight (FW) (b) and root dry weight (DW) (c). Values represent the means + SE from three independent experiments with six replicates each. Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA, P < 0.05) for each parameter was followed by the Duncan multiple range post hoc test. Respective significant differences were marked using letters a, b, c, and d. Control plants (TRS25 nontreated, uninoculated with R. solani), Rs plants (TRS25 nontreated, inoculated with R. solani), TRS25 plants (TRS25 pretreated, uninoculated with R. solani), and TRS25 + Rs plants (TRS25 pretreated, inoculated with R. solani) were used in the study
Effect of TRS25 on (a) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, hallmarks of lipid peroxidation (TBARS) content, (b) ascorbate, guaiacol and syringaldazine peroxidase (APX, GPX, and SPX), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activities, (c) phenolics (PC), ortodihydroxyphenolics (oDP), phenylpropanoids (PP), favonoids (FL), free salicylic acid (SA), salicylic acid glucosylated conjugates (SAGC), and volatiles: methyl salicylate (MeSA), ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS) β-cyclocitral, Z-3-hexanal, Z-3-hexenol and E-2-hexenal content, (d) callose and lignin content
| Biochemical parameter | Control | Rs | TRS25 | TRS25 + Rs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | ||||||||
| H2O2 (μmol g−1 FW) | 2.20 ± 0.38 | a | 2.16 ± 0.31 | a | 3.25 ± 0.48 | b | 3.13 ± 0.46 | b |
| TBARS (nmol g−1 FW) | 16.75 ± 4.07 | b | 20.76 ± 2.44 | c | 12.43 ± 0.58 | a | 12.71 ± 3.32 | a |
| b | ||||||||
| Defense enzymes | ||||||||
| APX (U mg−1 protein) | 2.42 ± 0.55 | c | 0.90 ± 0.54 | a | 1.51 ± 0.28 | b | 1.50 ± 0.31 | b |
| GPX (U mg−1 protein) | 1.00 ± 0.11 | a | 1.13 ± 0.13 | a | 0.99 ± 0.07 | a | 1.52 ± 0.11 | b |
| SPX (U mg−1 protein) | 0.31 ± 0.07 | ab | 0.39 ± 0.10 | b | 0.23 ± 0.06 | a | 0.54 ± 0.04 | c |
| PAL (U mg−1 protein) | 0.57 ± 0.07 | a | 0.82 ± 0.11 | ab | 1.22 ± 0.21 | bc | 1.46 ± 0.25 | c |
| PPO (U mg−1 protein) | 1.84 ± 0.36 | a | 2.11 ± 0.17 | a | 4.04 ± 1.02 | c | 3.84 ± 0.57 | bc |
| c | ||||||||
| Metabolic components | ||||||||
| PC (mg g−1 FW) | 4.87 ± 1.01 | a | 4.37 ± 1.22 | a | 9.84 ± 2.11 | b | 9.66 ± 1.15 | b |
| | 0.76 ± 0.09 | a | 0.75 ± 0.20 | a | 0.90 ± 0.05 | b | 1.11 ± 0.17 | b |
| PP (mg g−1 FW) | 3.22 ± 0.28 | a | 2.70 ± 0.55 | a | 5.08 ± 0.76 | b | 5.40 ± 1.00 | b |
| FL (mg g−1 FW) | 0.25 ± 0.02 | a | 0.27 ± 0.03 | a | 0.30 ± 0.03 | a | 0.37 ± 0.02 | b |
| SA (μg g−1 FW) | 2.98 ± 0.21 | a | 1.88 ± 0.15 | a | 2.95 ± 0.34 | a | 1.98 ± 0.07 | a |
| SAGC (μg g−1 FW) | 2.95 ± 0.31 | a | 3.12 ± 0.17 | a | 5.88 ± 0.41 | b | 6.31 ± 0.19 | b |
| VOC | ||||||||
| MeSA (fold) | 1.00 ± 0.00 | a | 1.50 ± 0.01 | a | 2.50 ± 0.05 | c | 2.00 ± 0.04 | b |
| EHS (fold) | 1.00 ± 0.00 | a | 1.17 ± 0.13 | a | 2.25 ± 0.08 | b | 3.11 ± 0.09 | c |
| β-cyclocitral (fold) | 1.00 ± 0.00 | a | 1.11 ± 0.08 | a | 3.11 ± 0.12 | b | 2.99 ± 0.14 | b |
| Z-3-Hexanal (fold) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | a | 1.10 ± 0.00 | b | 0.98 ± 0.20 | b | 2.14 ± 0.33 | c |
| Z-3-Hexenol (fold) | 1.00 ± 0.00 | a | 1.50 ± 0.21 | bc | 1.14 ± 0.17 | ab | 1.84 ± 0.36 | c |
| E-2-Hexenal (fold) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | a | 1.05 ± 0.00 | b | 1.10 ± 0.10 | b | 2.21 ± 0.17 | c |
| d | ||||||||
| Structural barriers | ||||||||
| Callose (μg g−1 FW) | 300 ± 15 | ab | 248 ± 20 | a | 415 ± 17 | c | 421 ± 7 | c |
| Lignin (mg g−1 FW) | 1.05 ± 0.12 | a | 1.29 ± 0.05 | ab | 2.25 ± 0.09 | c | 1.87 ± 0.08 | c |
Values represent the means + SE from three independent experiments with six replicates each. Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA, P < 0.05) for each parameter was followed by the Duncan multiple range post hoc test. Respective significant differences were marked using letters a, b, c, and d. Control plants (TRS25 nontreated, uninoculated with R. solani), Rs plants (TRS25 nontreated, inoculated with R. solani), TRS25 plants (TRS25 pretreated, uninoculated with R. solani), and TRS25 + Rs plants (TRS25 pretreated, inoculated with R. solani) were used in the study
Fig. 3Effect of TRS25 on relative expression of defense genes: a PR1, b PR5, c PR4, and d PR12 in cucumber plants. Values represent the means + SE from three independent experiments with six replicates each. Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA, P < 0.05) for each parameter was followed by the Duncan multiple range post hoc test. Respective significant differences were marked using letters a, b, c, and d. Control plants (TRS25 nontreated, uninoculated with R. solani), Rs plants (TRS25 nontreated, inoculated with R. solani), TRS25 plants (TRS25 pretreated, uninoculated with R. solani), and TRS25 + Rs plants (TRS25 pretreated, inoculated with R. solani) were used in the study
Fig. 4The cross section of the cucumber shoot (a) and root (b) tissues. Fluorescent confocal microscopy was used to detect callose deposition in the control and TRS25 plants. Abbreviations: iph internal phloem, eph external phloem, x xylem. The white arrows indicate light green fluorescence of callose in the cells separating internal phloem from the shoot pith in the cucumber shoot vascular bundles (a) and in tissue between xylem vessels of adjacent vascular bundles in roots (b)
Fig. 5The cross section of the cucumber shoot (a, b, c), root (d), and leaf (e) tissues. Fluorescent confocal microscopy was used to detect lignin deposition in the control and TRS25 plants. Abbreviations: iph internal phloem, eph external phloem, x xylem, nd nondetected, ep epidermis, co collenchyma. The white arrows indicate green fluorescence of lignin detected in cells surrounding of external phloem in vascular bundles in the cucumber shoot (a, b), in the walls of epidermis and collenchyma cells in the cucumber shoot (c), and in epidermis of leaves (e)