Literature DB >> 28879395

A comparison of laparoscopic and open D3 lymphadenectomy for transverse colon cancer.

Han Deok Kwak1, Jae Kyun Ju2, Soo Young Lee3, Chang Hyun Kim3, Young Jin Kim3, Hyeong Rok Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The type of surgery or surgical approach for transverse colon cancer treatment largely depends on the tumor location or surgeon's preference. However, extensive lymphadenectomy appears to improve the long-term outcomes of locally advanced colon cancers. This study was designed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes after surgery via the laparoscopic or open approach with radical D3 lymph node dissection in patients with stage II and III transverse colon cancer.
METHODS: Patients were treated for stage II and III transverse colon cancer between May 2006 and December 2014. This retrospective study evaluated data collected prospectively at a tertiary teaching hospital. Radical D3 lymphadenectomy included the principal middle colic artery nodes.
RESULTS: The study included 144 patients among whom 118 (81.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Significantly more patients in the laparoscopic group underwent extended right hemicolectomy compared with the open group (90.7 vs. 65.4%, p = 0.005). The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (151.3 vs. 131.2 min, p = 0.021), and the open group had a greater estimated blood loss volume (160.8 vs. 289.3 ml, p = 0.011). Although the groups differed in terms of tumor size (5.8 vs 7.9 cm, p = 0.007), other pathologic outcomes did not differ. The groups did not differ regarding postoperative parameters or disease-free, overall, and cancer-specific survivals.
CONCLUSION: Despite differences in surgical methods and related factors, no long-term differences in outcomes were observed between laparoscopic and open approaches to radical D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with stage II and III transverse colon cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Open; Outcomes; Radical lymphadenectomy; Transverse colon cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28879395     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2890-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus.

Authors:  R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.

Authors:  Peter J Hewett; Randall A Allardyce; Philip F Bagshaw; Christopher M Frampton; Francis A Frizelle; Nicholas A Rieger; J Shona Smith; Michael J Solomon; Jacqueline H Stephens; Andrew R L Stevenson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Esther Kuhry; Wolfgang Schwenk; Robin Gaupset; Ulla Romild; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Marco Ettore Allaix; Paola Cassoni; Giuseppe Giraudo; Simone Arolfo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Comparing the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy in transverse colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Baloyiannis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Panagiotis Ntellas; Katerina Dadouli; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The relation between oncologic outcomes and metastatic lymph node location following laparoscopic resection of stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Han Deok Kwak; Jae Kyun Ju; Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy oriented by superior mesenteric artery for right colon cancer: efficacy evaluation with a match-controlled analysis.

Authors:  Weigang Dai; Jian Zhang; Weixin Xiong; Jianbo Xu; Shirong Cai; Min Tan; Yulong He; Wu Song; Yujie Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.