Literature DB >> 28879303

Success rates of the first inferior alveolar nerve block administered by dental practitioners.

Yutthasak Kriangcherdsak1, Somchart Raucharernporn1, Teeranut Chaiyasamut1, Natthamet Wongsirichat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) of the mandible is commonly used in the oral cavity as an anesthetic technique for dental procedures. This study evaluated the success rate of the first IANB administered by dental practitioners.
METHODS: Volunteer dental practitioners at Mahidol University who had never performed an INAB carried out 106 INAB procedures. The practitioners were divided into 12 groups with their advisors by randomized control trials. We recorded the success rate via pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores.
RESULTS: A large percentage of the dental practitioners (85.26%) used the standard method to locate the anatomical landmarks, injecting the local anesthetic at the correct position, with the barrel of the syringe parallel to the occlusal plane of the mandibular teeth. Further, 68.42% of the dental practitioners injected the local anesthetic on the right side by using the left index finger for retraction. The onset time was approximately 0-5 mins for nearly half of the dental practitioners (47.37% for subjective onset and 43.16% for objective onset), while the duration of the IANB was approximately 240-300 minutes (36.84%) after the initiation of numbness. Moreover, the VAS pain scores were 2.5 ± 1.85 and 2.1 ± 1.8 while injecting and delivering local anesthesia, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The only recorded factor that affected the success of the local anesthetic was the administering practitioner. This reinforces the notion that local anesthesia administration is a technique-sensitive procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  First injection; Inferior alveolar nerve; Nerve block; Pain measurement; Pain score; VAS

Year:  2016        PMID: 28879303      PMCID: PMC5564079          DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 2383-9309


  10 in total

1.  Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Bella L Colombini; Karin C S Modena; Adriana M Calvo; Vivien T Sakai; Fernando P M Giglio; Thiago J Dionísio; Alceu S Trindade; José R P Lauris; Carlos F Santos
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-03-24

2.  Surgical anatomy of the buccal nerve.

Authors:  C W Hendy; K G Smith; P P Robinson
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Comparative study of the novel and conventional injection approach for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  K Boonsiriseth; N Sirintawat; K Arunakul; N Wongsirichat
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  The sensory distribution of the buccal nerve.

Authors:  C W Hendy; P P Robinson
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  The efficacy of an elevated concentration of lidocaine HCl in impacted lower third molar surgery.

Authors:  Bushara Ping; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Chavengkiat Saengsirinavin; Puthavy Im; Callum Durward; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  A clinical audit into the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block analgesia in general dental practice.

Authors:  A Keetley; D R Moles
Journal:  Prim Dent Care       Date:  2001-10

7.  Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Alejandro Sierra Rebolledo; Esther Delgado Molina; Leonardo Berini Aytís; Cosme Gay Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2007-03-01

8.  The anesthetic efficacy of 4 percent articaine 1:200,000 epinephrine: two controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Paul A Moore; Sean G Boynes; Elliot V Hersh; Scott S DeRossi; Thomas P Sollecito; J Max Goodson; Juliana S Leonel; Constantinos Floros; Carrie Peterson; Matthew Hutcheson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

10.  A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.

Authors:  Leonardo V L Gregorio; Fernando P M Giglio; Vivien T Sakai; Karin C S Modena; Bella L Colombini; Adriana M Calvo; Carla R Sipert; Thiago J Dionísio; José R P Lauris; Flávio A C Faria; Alceu S Trindade Junior; Carlos F Santos
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-04-16
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of phentolamine mesylate in reducing the duration of various local anesthetics.

Authors:  Alejandro Gago-García; Cayetana Barrilero-Martin; Miguel Ángel Alobera-Gracia; Mariano Del Canto-Pingarrón; Jesús Seco-Calvo
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-01-29

2.  Changes in Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate of Patients without Systemic Diseases Following the Injection of 2% Lidocaine Plus Epinephrine 1:80000 in an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block - A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ehsan Aliabadi; Vahid Divanpour; Mohsen Mardani
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.