| Literature DB >> 28878806 |
Ricardo De Paoli-Iseppi1,2, Bruce E Deagle2, Clive R McMahon3, Mark A Hindell1, Joanne L Dickinson4, Simon N Jarman5,6.
Abstract
DNA methylation (DNAm) is a key mechanism for regulating gene expression in animals and levels are known to change with age. Recent studies have used DNAm changes as a biomarker to estimate chronological age in humans and these techniques are now also being applied to domestic and wild animals. Animal age is widely used to track ongoing changes in ecosystems, however chronological age information is often unavailable for wild animals. An ability to estimate age would lead to improved monitoring of (i) population trends and status and (ii) demographic properties such as age structure and reproductive performance. Recent studies have revealed new examples of DNAm age association in several new species increasing the potential for developing DNAm age biomarkers for a broad range of wild animals. Emerging technologies for measuring DNAm will also enhance our ability to study age-related DNAm changes and to develop new molecular age biomarkers.Entities:
Keywords: ageing; conservation; ecology; epigenetics; methylation; wild animals
Year: 2017 PMID: 28878806 PMCID: PMC5572392 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Figure 1Timeline of the major studies and tissues analysed for global or targeted DNA methylation in this review. Studies are age-associated except where indicated. Superscripts: ∧(captive raised or model studies) and *(wild animal studies). (1, Grönniger et al., 2010; 2, Teschendorff et al., 2010; 3, Maegawa et al., 2010; 4, Bocklandt et al., 2011; 5, Koch and Wagner, 2011; 6, Garagnani et al., 2012; 7, Horvath, 2013; 8, Hannum et al., 2013; 9, Gryzinska et al., 2013; 10, Polanowski et al., 2014; 11, Shimoda et al., 2014; 12, Sun et al., 2014; 13, Nätt et al., 2014; 14, Andraszek et al., 2014; 15, Bekaert et al., 2015; 16, Yan et al., 2015; 17, Nilsen et al., 2016; 18, Spiers et al., 2016; 19, Gryzinska et al., 2016; 20, Penner et al., 2016; 21, Christiansen et al., 2016; 22, Eipel et al., 2016; 23, Mawlood et al., 2016; 24, Bentz et al., 2016; 25, Verhulst et al., 2016; 26, Caracappa et al., 2016; 27, Matsumoto et al., 2016; 28, Romano et al., 2017; 29, Stubbs et al., 2017).
Figure 2Variable global methylation in vertebrates. *Current genome on NCBI (if available). ∧Average 5 mC for classes (Jabbari et al., 1997). (1, Ehrlich et al., 1982; 2, Gama-Sosa et al., 1983; 3, Yokomine et al., 2006; 4, Jabbari et al., 1997; 5, Vanyushin et al., 1970, 1973; 6, Varriale and Bernardi, 2006; 7, Shimoda et al., 2014; 8, Ponger and Li, 2005; 9, Okamura et al., 2010; Tree, Letunic and Bork, 2006).