| Literature DB >> 28878683 |
Michelle Sartori1, Filipe F Conti2, Danielle da Silva Dias2, Fernando Dos Santos1, Jacqueline F Machi3, Zaira Palomino4, Dulce E Casarini4, Bruno Rodrigues5, Kátia De Angelis2, Maria-Claudia Irigoyen1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate autonomic and cardiovascular function, as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in ob/ob female mice.Entities:
Keywords: autonomic; cardiac dysfunction; female; inflammation; obesity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28878683 PMCID: PMC5572327 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Body weight, tissues weight, and metabolic evaluations in wild type group (WT; n = 14) and ob/ob group (OB; n = 14).
| Body weight (g) | 20.1 ± 0.2 | 50.2 ± 0.5 |
| Abdominal adipose tissue (g) | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 8.02 ± 0.20 |
| Glycaemia (mmol/L) | 6.71 ± 0.33 | 9.99 ± 0.55 |
| Tryglicerydes (mg/dL) | 107 ± 13 | 142 ± 6 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 162 ± 2 | 167 ± 3 |
| GTT (mg/dL/min) | 15, 424 ± 3, 351 | 38, 491 ± 1, 272 |
Data are reported as mean± SEM.
p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Figure 1Cardiac function in WT (n = 14) and OB (n = 14). (A) Ejection fraction (EF); (B) isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT); (C) myocardium performance index (MPI) groups. *p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Hemodynamic and autonomic parameters in wild type group (WT; n = 8) and ob/ob group (OB; n = 8).
| SAP (mmHg) | 132 ± 2 | 129 ± 4 |
| DAP (mmHg) | 96 ± 2 | 97 ± 3 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 114 ± 2 | 114 ± 4 |
| HR (bpm) | 562 ± 14 | 564 ± 20 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 12.0 ± 1.3 | 6.1 ± 0.9 |
| LF (ms2) | 135 ± 26 | 7 ± 2 |
| HF (ms2) | 43 ± 6 | 13 ± 2 |
| VAR (mmHg2) | 20 ± 3 | 24 ± 3 |
| LF (mmHg2) | 9 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 |
| Alpha index (ms/mmHg) | 3.12 ± 0.32 | 0.74 ± 0.07 |
| SD1 | 13.9 ± 2.5 | 6.0 ± 1.3 |
| SD2 | 24.2 ± 1.5 | 15.0 ± 2.3 |
| Alpha 1 | 1.00 ± 0.09 | 0.57 ± 0.05 |
| Alpha 2 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.95 ± 0.03 |
| SampEn | 1.56 ± 0.09 | 1.72 ± 0.03 |
| ApEn | 1.41 ± 0.05 | 1.47 ± 0.02 |
Data are reported as mean± SEM.
p < 0.05 vs. WT. SAP, systolic arterial pressure; DAP, diastolic arterial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; RMSSD, root mean square of the successive differences; VAR, total variance; LF, low-frequency band; (0.1–1.0 Hz); HF, high-frequency band (HF: 1.0–5 Hz); Poincare plot (SD1 and SD2); Detrended fluctuation analysis (Alpha 1 and Alpha 2); Sample entropy (SampEn), and Approximate entropy (ApEn).
Figure 2Cardiovascular autonomic assessment in WT (n = 8) and OB (n = 8) groups. (A) baroreflex sensitivity evaluated by bradycardic and tachycardic responses to arterial pressure changes; (B) total variance of the pulse interval; (C) sympathovagal balance. *p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Figure 3Angiotensin II levels in WT (n = 6) and OB (n = 6) groups. (A) adipose tissue; (B) kidney; (C) heart. *p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Figure 4Adiponectin levels in WT (n = 6) and OB (n = 6) groups. (A) Adipose tissue; (B) spleen. *p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Inflammatory markers in abdominal adipose tissue and spleen in wild type group (WT; n = 6) and ob/ob group (OB; n = 6).
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 154 ± 7 | 141 ± 16 |
| PAI-1 (pg/ml) | 1, 353 ± 211 | 4, 616 ± 710 |
| TNF alpha (pg/ml) | 70 ± 5 | 96 ± 4 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 148 ± 15 | 380 ± 52 |
| PAI-1 (pg/ml) | 1, 577 ± 407 | 3, 706 ± 723 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM.
p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Renal and cardiac oxidative stress in wild type group (WT; n = 8) and ob/ob group (OB; n = 8).
| Protein oxidation (nmol/mg protein) | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 6.4 ± 0.5 |
| Lipoperoxidation (μmoles/mg protein) | 8.8 ± 1.2 | 11.0 ± 0.8 |
| SOD (USOD/mg protein) | 19 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 |
| CAT (nmol/mg protein) | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
| Protein oxidation (nmol/mg protein) | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.4 |
| Lipoperoxidation (μmoles/mg protein) | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
| SOD (USOD/mg protein) | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 |
| CAT (nmol/mg protein) | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.03 |
Data are reported as mean± SEM.
p < 0.05 vs. WT.
Figure 5Correlations between: (A) Alpha Index and cardiac Ang II; (B) VAR-IP and cardiac Ang II; (C) %HF and cardiac Ang 1–7; (D) %LF and cardiac Ang 1–7; (E) RMSSD and PAI-1; (F) RMSSD and Adiponectin. It was used between 5 and 7 animals per group. The correlations E and F were made using only the OB group. Open circles represent the WT group and closed circles represent the OB group.