| Literature DB >> 28878625 |
Shimon P Francis1, Lisa L Cunningham1.
Abstract
The first major recognition of drug-induced hearing loss can be traced back more than seven decades to the development of streptomycin as an antimicrobial agent. Since then at least 130 therapeutic drugs have been recognized as having ototoxic side-effects. Two important classes of ototoxic drugs are the aminoglycoside antibiotics and the platinum-based antineoplastic agents. These drugs save the lives of millions of people worldwide, but they also cause irreparable hearing loss. In the inner ear, sensory hair cells (HCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) are important cellular targets of these drugs, and most mechanistic studies have focused on the cell-autonomous responses of these cell types in response to ototoxic stress. Despite several decades of studies on ototoxicity, important unanswered questions remain, including the cellular and molecular mechanisms that determine whether HCs and SGNs will live or die when confronted with ototoxic challenge. Emerging evidence indicates that other cell types in the inner ear can act as mediators of survival or death of sensory cells and SGNs. For example, glia-like supporting cells (SCs) can promote survival of both HCs and SGNs. Alternatively, SCs can act to promote HC death and inhibit neural fiber expansion. Similarly, tissue resident macrophages activate either pro-survival or pro-death signaling that can influence HC survival after exposure to ototoxic agents. Together these data indicate that autonomous responses that occur within a stressed HC or SGN are not the only (and possibly not the primary) determinants of whether the stressed cell ultimately lives or dies. Instead non-cell-autonomous responses are emerging as significant determinants of HC and SGN survival vs. death in the face of ototoxic stress. The goal of this review is to summarize the current evidence on non-cell-autonomous responses to ototoxic stress and to discuss ways in which this knowledge may advance the development of therapies to reduce hearing loss caused by these drugs.Entities:
Keywords: aminoglycoside; cisplatin; glial cells; macrophages; non-autonomous; ototoxicity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28878625 PMCID: PMC5572385 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5102 Impact factor: 5.505
Figure 1Non-autonomous cellular signals influence survival of HCs and SGNs as well as SC proliferation after ototoxic insult. (A) In response to ototoxic stress in the cochlea, SCs can promote either survival (via induction of HSP70) (Takada et al., 2015) or death (via activation of ERK1/2 and JNK pathways) (Lahne and Gale, 2008; Anttonen et al., 2016) of HCs. Supporting cells can also support the survival of SGNs after ototoxic injury through the release of protective neurotrophins (Sugawara et al., 2007; Zilberstein et al., 2012; Bailey and Green, 2014). Similarly, macrophages can promote survival of SGNs by releasing cytoprotective neurotrophins (Kaur et al., 2015b), and they can also promote HC death after ototoxic injury by releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines (Sato et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2015). (B) Vestibular SCs and macrophages can promote HC survival during ototoxic stress through the release of HSP70 and HO-1/HSP32, respectively (May et al., 2013; Baker et al., 2015). Macrophages can promote SC proliferation in response to ototoxic stress through the release of mitogenic cytokines TNF-α and TGF-α, or they can suppress SC proliferation through release of TGF-β (Warchol, 1999). Arrows indicate which cell types are involved in each signaling event. Signaling molecules are indicated beside each arrow. Green, pro-survival signals; Red, pro-death signals; Purple, mitogenic signals; Orange, anti-proliferative signals.