Autophagy Dysregulation in ALS: When Protein Aggregates Get Out of Hand.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder that results from the loss of upper and lower motor neurons. One of the key pathological hallmarks in diseased neurons is the mislocalization of disease-associated proteins and the formation of cytoplasmic aggregates of these proteins and their interactors due to defective protein quality control. This apparent imbalance in the cellular protein homeostasis could be a crucial factor in causing motor neuron death in the later stages of the disease in patients. Autophagy is a major protein degradation pathway that is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates and damaged organelles. Abnormalities in autophagy have been observed in numerous neurodegenerative disorders, including ALS. In this review, we discuss the contribution of autophagy dysfunction in various in vitro and in vivo models of ALS. Furthermore, we examine the crosstalk between autophagy and other cellular stresses implicated in ALS pathogenesis and the therapeutic implications of regulating autophagy in ALS.

Introduction

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, age-related neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of both upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord (Rowland and Shneider, 2001; Pasinelli and Brown, 2006). ALS is the most common motor neuron disorder with an incidence rate of 2.7 per 100,000 Caucasians, and typically has an age-of-onset varying between 50–65 years with a median age of onset at 64 years (Zarei et al., 2015). The progressive degeneration of motor neurons is followed by muscle atrophy, spasticity and quadriplegia, culminating in death within 3–5 years of disease onset due to respiratory failure (Rowland and Shneider, 2001). Current treatments include Riluzole, which extends survival by 2–3 months in a subset of patients, and the recently FDA-approved drug, Radicava, which slows down the decline of physical function. However, there are currently no cures for ALS (Traynor et al., 2003; Yoshino and Kimura, 2006; Abe et al., 2014; Ittner et al., 2015).

ALS is mainly categorized into two forms: familial ALS (fALS) and sporadic ALS (sALS). SALS is more common, comprising 90%–95% of cases and does not have any known genetic inheritance. On the other hand, fALS affects 5%–10% of cases and is hereditary (Zarei et al., 2015). Early linkage studies in fALS families led to discovery of mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (mSOD1), thus establishing the first genetic link to ALS (Turner et al., 2013). With the advent of whole-exome sequencing, there has been a tremendous increase in discovery of new disease-causing genes in ALS, notably fused in sarcoma (FUS), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), C9orf72, optineurin (OPTN), sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1), ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2), dynactin (DCTN1), MATR3 and valosin-containing protein (VCP; Renton et al., 2014).

Like many other neurodegenerative disorders, a key pathological hallmark of ALS is the mislocalization of proteins and presence of cytoplasmic aggregates in motor neurons and surrounding cells, suggesting defects in the machinery that regulates protein homeostasis. Cells have two major protein degradation pathways: the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagy-lysosome pathway. The UPS, the major proteolytic pathway in the cell, degrades short-lived, soluble proteins. Autophagy, on the other hand, is responsible for degrading relatively long-lived, cytoplasmic proteins, soluble and insoluble misfolded proteins, and also entire organelles. In this review, we discuss the importance of the autophagy pathway in the context of ALS. In addition, we discuss the interaction of autophagy with other biological pathways relevant to motor neuron degeneration and provide perspective on the role of autophagy in the overall pathogenesis of ALS.

Dysfunction in Protein Homeostasis: Evidence from ALS Pathology

Proteins are dynamic molecules within a cell, undergoing synthesis, proper folding and assembly and timely degradation. The balance between these events is maintained by a network of pathways called the proteostatic network (Balch et al., 2008). This network is maintained by various factors that include molecular chaperones, their regulators, and proteolytic machinery (Crippa et al., 2010; Carra et al., 2012). In addition to maintaining protein levels within the proteome, proteolysis also plays a crucial role in the elimination of dysfunctional proteins such as misfolded proteins and aggregates (Balch et al., 2008).

A crucial pathological feature of ALS includes accumulation of insoluble protein aggregates in degenerating motor neurons and surrounding oligodendrocytes in the spinal cord, hippocampus, cerebellum and frontal and temporal cortices (Balch et al., 2008). These aggregates are typically formed by misfolded proteins that have lost their native conformation. Formation of misfolded protein aggregates is a normal physiological phenomenon; the cell continuously employs quality control mechanisms to either degrade the misfolded proteins to avoid aggregate formation or clears aggregates that have already formed. However, the persistence of these aggregates in diseased neurons suggests a disruption in the mechanisms normally responsible for misfolded protein turnover and aggregate clearance. Pathological aggregates may stimulate aberrant cellular interactions between proteins or disrupt cellular function by sequestering proteins within aggregates, thus contributing to cytotoxicity.

The discovery of disease-causing mutations in genes, particularly in SOD1, TDP-43, FUS, UBQLN2, OPTN, SQSTM1 and C9orf72, has enabled pathophysiologists to identify and characterize the corresponding proteins from patient tissues (Balch et al., 2008). In both familial and sporadic cases of ALS, immunofluorescence studies of post-mortem brain and spinal cord tissues have shown the presence of these proteins within aggregates (Table 1).

Table 1

Overview of characteristics of protein aggregates formed by SOD1, TDP-43, FUS, OPTN, UBQLN2 and C9orf72 DPR in familial and sporadic cases of ALS.

Type	Tissues affected	Characteristic pathologies	References
SOD1
SOD1-fALS	Spinal cord	Lewy body-like, Fibrillized, Ubiquitinated	Shibata et al. (1996b), Bruijn et al. (1998), Kato et al. (2000) and Ross and Poirier (2004)
sALS	Spinal cord	Lewy body-like, Fibrillized, Ubiquitinated	Shibata et al. (1996a,b), Watanabe et al. (2001) and Forsberg et al. (2010)
TDP-43
TDP-43-fALS	Spinal cord, Frontal cortex	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Giordana et al. (2010)
Sporadic ALS	Spinal cord, Hippocampus, Neocortex, Glia	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated, Hyper-phosphorylated, C-terminal fragments	Arai et al. (2006), Neumann et al. (2006), Mackenzie et al. (2007) and Giordana et al. (2010)
fALS (non-SOD1)	Spinal cord, Glia	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Mackenzie et al. (2007) and Tan et al. (2007)
FUS
FUS-fALS	Oligodendrocytes, Spinal cord, Motor cortex, Hippocampus	Basophilic, Tangle-like, Ubiquitinated	Mackenzie et al. (2011)
sALS	Spinal cord, Glia	Skein-like, Basophilic, Ubiquitinated	Bäumer et al. (2010), Deng et al. (2010) and Mackenzie et al. (2011)
fALS (non-SOD1)	Spinal cord, Hippocampus	Skein-like	Bäumer et al. (2010), Deng et al. (2010) and Huang et al. (2011)
OPTN
OPTN-fALS	Spinal cord	Ubiquitinated	Maruyama et al. (2010)
sALS	Spinal cord, Frontal cortex	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Maruyama et al. (2010) and Hortobágyi et al. (2011)
fALS (non-SOD1)	Spinal cord	Skein-like	Deng et al. (2011a)
sALS (SOD1)	Spinal cord	Lewy body-like, Ubiquitinated	Maruyama et al. (2010) and Deng et al. (2011a)
UBQLN2
UBQLN2-fALS	Spinal cord	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Williams et al. (2012)
sALS	Spinal cord	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Deng et al. (2011b) and Williams et al. (2012)
fALS (non-SOD1)	Spinal cord	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Deng et al. (2011b) and Williams et al. (2012)
fALS (C9orf72)	Hippocampus, Cerebellum, Spinal cord	Skein-like, Ubiquitinated	Al-Sarraj et al. (2011), Ash et al. (2013) and Mori et al. (2013)
C9orf72 DPR
fALS-C9orf72	Hippocampus, Cerebellum, Neocortex	Ubiquitinated	Mackenzie et al. (2013)

*SQSTM1/p62 protein co-localizes with aggregates in almost all familial and sporadic ALS cases.

The first evidence of aggregates was described in spinal cords of fALS patients carrying a mutation in the SOD1 gene (Rosen et al., 1993; Bruijn et al., 1998). These SOD1-positive aggregates are sometimes polyubiquitinated and fibrillized, and are hypothesized to seed aggregation of surrounding proteins (Basso et al., 2006). Evidence of SOD1 aggregation has also been reported in post-mortem samples of spinal cords from sALS patients (Shibata et al., 1994, 1996a,b; Watanabe et al., 2001; Forsberg et al., 2010). Neurofilament aggregates containing SOD1 have also been detected in cultured motor neurons that were differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from patients carrying a SOD1 mutation (Chen et al., 2015). Thus far, SOD1 aggregates have only been observed in fALS cases containing SOD1 mutations.

Examination of SOD1-negative fALS and sALS patients identified TDP-43 as a major component of ubiquitinated inclusions in spinal cords, hippocampus, frontal cortex neurons, and glial cells (Arai et al., 2006; Neumann et al., 2006). TDP-43 inclusions are found in motor cortices and spinal cords of nearly 97% of fALS and sALS patients. They are associated with many other neurodegenerative disorders as well, collectively termed TDP-43 proteinopathies (Sreedharan et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2014). TDP-43 proteinopathy aggregates commonly contain TDP-35 and TDP-25 species that are cleaved forms of full-length TDP-43 that are thought to be pathogenic (Arai et al., 2006; Neumann et al., 2006). In addition to accumulation of wild-type TDP-43 in SOD1-negative ALS patients, ALS-causing mutations in TDP-43 result in cytoplasmic accumulation of insoluble TDP-43 in patient neurons (Van Deerlin et al., 2008).

Similar to TDP-43, even before the discovery of pathological mutations, FUS was found to be a major protein aggregate in affected neurons in Huntington’s Disease (Zoghbi and Orr, 2000; Doi et al., 2008). In post-mortem tissues of FUS mutation carriers, FUS was shown to be enriched in cytoplasmic inclusions within the motor neuron and glial cells (Kwiatkowski et al., 2009; Vance et al., 2009). One of the unique features of FUS mutations is the vast heterogeneity in the age-of-onset, where the P525L mutation associates with relatively early onset resulting in an aggressive and juvenile form of ALS (Mackenzie et al., 2011). In the juvenile cases, FUS pathology is slightly different—FUS aggregates appear to have a filamentous structure that are associated with smaller granules (Bäumer et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2011). In addition to mutation-driven cytoplasmic inclusions, FUS-positive inclusions have also been observed in sALS cases and non-SOD1 fALS cases (Deng et al., 2010).

The most common genetic cause of ALS stems from an expansion mutation in C9orf72 (chromosome 9 open reading frame 72), characterized by a hexanucleotide repeat (HRE) expansion of GGGGCC in the first intron of the gene (DeJesus-Hernandez et al., 2011; Renton et al., 2011). The inclusions that were first isolated post-mortem from neurons in the pyramidal, frontal and temporal cortices as well as the hippocampus were all TDP-43 immunopositive (Mackenzie et al., 2014). Further examination of inclusions from the cerebellum and pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus and neocortex revealed other aggregates that were TDP-43-negative (Mackenzie et al., 2014). Furthermore, these inclusions also contained dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins resulting from non-ATG-initiated translation of intronic repeats (Mackenzie et al., 2013).

The discovery of ALS-associated mutations in genes encoding for proteins involved in protein degradation pathways provided compelling evidence towards a model of ALS as a disease of protein homeostatic dysregulation. These genes included UBQLN2, OPTN, VCP and SQSTM1. In particular, SQSTM1/p62 is found in almost all pathological inclusions (Majcher et al., 2015). OPTN was first detected in skein-like inclusions in spinal cords of non-SOD1 fALS and sALS patients (Deng et al., 2011a). However, studies of OPTN immunoreactivity report variable results, with OPTN observed in some inclusions and not others from SOD1 fALS and FUS fALS cases (Maruyama et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2011a; Hortobágyi et al., 2011). These discrepancies suggest a need for further studies to determine the pathology of OPTN in ALS. UBQLN2-immunopositive inclusions have been detected in spinal cords of both sALS and fALS patients with mutations in SOD1, FUS, TDP-43 or C9orf72 (Deng et al., 2011b; Williams et al., 2012). Interestingly, spinal cord analyses of UBQLN2 mutation carriers revealed aggregates that are also immunopositive for other ALS-causing proteins such as FUS, OPTN and TDP-43 (Williams et al., 2012). The presence of proteasome-associated proteins within pathological aggregates indicates a cellular response to degrade the aggregates. Thus, the persistence of aggregates coupled with evidence of ALS-causing mutations in genes associated with proteasome function strongly suggests a defect in proteolysis in ALS patients.

Autophagy

Autophagy, from the root words for “auto” = self and “phagy” = eating, is an intracellular catabolic process involved in the turnover of cellular components and nutrients such as amino acids, lipids and other metabolites to maintain cellular homeostasis (Eskelinen and Saftig, 2009). Autophagy as a cellular protein degradation mechanism first came to light when a scientist named Christian De Duve discovered a novel organelle that he termed the “lysosome” (De duve et al., 1955). It was only after the discovery of starvation-induced autophagy in yeast and autophagy-related genes (ATGs) that the mechanism itself came to prominence (Ohsumi, 2014). Autophagy maintains cellular and protein homeostasis in a tightly regulated fashion, either constitutively active in cells and/or in response to nutrient depletion or organelle damage (Shintani and Klionsky, 2004). Autophagy can be divided into three types depending on the substrate and pre-lysosomal steps involved: microautophagy, macroautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Macroautophagy, hereby referred to as autophagy, is the only pathway through which large protein aggregates and damaged organelles are degraded (Glick et al., 2010).

Mechanism of Autophagy

The process of autophagy begins with the formation of an autophagosome that sequesters degradation targets including soluble proteins, insoluble protein aggregates, and organelles, and delivers them to lysosomes for degradation (Ravikumar et al., 2009). This is orchestrated by a complex network of proteins encoded by ATGs (Reggiori and Klionsky, 2002; Ravikumar et al., 2009). The mechanism of autophagy can be broken down into three major steps: initiation, phagophore elongation, and autophagosome maturation/lysosomal degradation.

Initiation

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a well-characterized major regulator of autophagy initiation (Jung et al., 2010). Typically, under nutrient-rich conditions, mTOR is a negative regulator of autophagy through inactivation of ULK1 (unc51-like autophagy activating kinase 1), ATG13, and FIP200 (focal adhesion kinase family–interacting protein of 200kD). Together, these three proteins form the autophagy initiation complex (Hurley and Young, 2017). During nutrient starvation or rapamycin treatment, mTOR is released from ULK1, allowing it to form the initiation complex. The autophagy initiation complex acts in conjunction with the PI3K complex, which consists of Vps34, Beclin-1 (BECN1) and p150. These two complexes regulate the formation of a double-membraned cistern that is a precursor to the autophagosome called a phagophore (Hurley and Young, 2017).

Phagophore Elongation

Phagophore elongation and autophagosome formation is facilitated by two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems: the ATG12:ATG5:ATG16L system and PE-LC3 system. The first system facilitates conjugation of LC3 (light chain 3) with PE (phosphatidylethanolamine; Rubinsztein et al., 2012). The cytoplasmic form of LC3, called LC3-I, becomes lipidated by PE, which allows it to be recruited to the phagophore (Tanida et al., 2008). Once the phagophore elongates, it seals around the cytoplasmic substrates to form a double-membraned autophagosome (Rubinsztein et al., 2012). Next, the ATG12:ATG5:ATG16L complex dissociates from the membrane, leaving a part of LC3 behind, called LC3-II. Thus LC3-II is a convenient marker for autophagosome detection (Tanida et al., 2008).

Autophagosome Maturation/Lysosomal Degradation

The autophagosomes containing cargo destined for degradation are transported along microtubules via dynein-dynactin (DCTN1) complexes to endosomes and lysosomes (Cheng X.-T. et al., 2015). The autophagosomes fuse with endosomes to form amphisomes or with lysosomes to form autolysosomes. Amphisomes also subsequently fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes (Klionsky et al., 2014). These fusion processes require non-ATG protein complexes that includes Rab proteins and ATPases. In the final step, lysosomal enzymes degrade the contents within the autolysosomes (Dunn, 1994).

Autophagy in Neurons

Adult neurons are highly specialized, post-mitotic cells that do not undergo cell division. Hence, unlike most other cell types where toxic components are diluted by cell division, neurons are susceptible to accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates and damaged organelles throughout their lifespan. They require active protein quality control processes to maintain cell viability and homeostasis (Damme et al., 2015; Maday, 2016). Neurons consist of a cell body (soma), dendrites, and axons arranged into an elongated shape. Autophagosomes form anywhere within a neuron where there are toxic substrates that need to be degraded, whereas the majority of lysosomes are located within the soma (Maday, 2016). Thus, neurons have active trafficking machinery that transport autophagosomes from the distal ends of the neurons to the soma through microtubule-associated dynein motor proteins (Cheng X.-T. et al., 2015; Maday, 2016).

The role of basal autophagy in neurons has been demonstrated in mice where deficiency of key autophagy proteins, Atg5 and Atg7, led to development of neurodegenerative and behavioral deficits (Hara et al., 2006; Komatsu et al., 2006). In addition to defects in autophagy induction, impaired autophagosome clearance has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders (Boland et al., 2008). Autophagy dysregulation has been implicated in various neurodegenerative disorders, especially in ones that present during adulthood such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Huntington’s disease (Kesidou et al., 2013; Menzies et al., 2015; Nah et al., 2015).

In ALS, multiple studies of post-mortem patient tissues provide evidence for autophagy dysregulation in motor neurons. A study investigating the lumbar spinal cords of patients with sALS described degenerated motor neurons with inclusions that were immunopositive for p62 and LC3-II (Sasaki, 2011). These inclusions were associated with autophagosomes and/or autolysosomes, suggesting autophagic activity in the spinal cord motor neurons of these patients (Sasaki, 2011). In addition to human post-mortem tissues, p62-positive inclusions are also significantly enriched in iPSC-derived neurons from patients with expanded GGGGCC repeats in the C9orf72 gene (Almeida et al., 2013). In response to autophagy inhibition, these neurons were more susceptible to cell death, suggesting that autophagy function was compromised to begin with Almeida et al. (2013). Furthermore, a significant reduction in autophagy was observed in iPSC-derived neurons from ALS/frontotemporal dementia (FTLD) patients exhibiting C9orf72 haploinsufficiency (Webster et al., 2016). Increased numbers of in vitro and in vivo models are revealing perturbations to the autophagy machinery in the pathogenesis of the ALS.

Role of Autophagy in ALS: Lessons from In Vitro and In Vivo Models

Autophagy is a crucial mechanism that aids in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, especially in neurons. Failure in autophagy machinery could be a significant contributor to the pathological formation of toxic aggregates in ALS. A defect in autophagy could arise from either one or more events: (i) failure in autophagy initiation; (ii) failure in autophagosome formation and/or maturation; (iii) defects in the transport of cargo within autophagosomes; (iv) failure in the fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes; or (v) defective lysosomal degradation. Thus, it is imperative to study the mechanism of autophagy in a variety of in vivo and in vitro model systems to gain a complete understanding of the role of autophagy in ALS. This knowledge would allow for tailoring of therapeutics to specifically target affected pathways.

Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1)

SOD1 is a highly conserved cytoplasmic and mitochondrial antioxidizing enzyme that is involved in scavenging and converting toxic superoxide radicals into reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; Wang et al., 2006). In 1993, the first genetic mutations were identified in the SOD1 gene in individuals with fALS (Rosen et al., 1993) Further studies of fALS genomes has led to the discovery of more than 100 mutations in the SOD1 gene. Currently, SOD1 mutations account for approximately 12% of fALS cases and about 1% of sALS cases (Renton et al., 2014).

Despite being the first genetic link to ALS, the role of SOD1 in the pathogenesis of ALS is still an active area of investigation. Early studies suggested autophagy activation had a positive effect on cell proliferation and survival in mutant SOD1-mediated toxicity (Kabuta et al., 2006). A plausible mechanism came to light when it was observed that levels of the transcription factor, Transcription factor EB (TFEB), and one its key target genes, BECN1, were downregulated in spinal cord motor neurons of SOD1-ALS patients (Chen et al., 2015). BECN1 encodes for Beclin-1, which is a key regulator of autophagy initiation; thus down-regulation of BECN1 suggests reduced autophagy in these neurons. In support of this, overexpression of TFEB in cells expressing SOD1G93A promoted autophagy (Chen et al., 2015). Overexpression of TFEB also increased cell proliferation, pointing to a direct correlation between autophagy induction and cell survival (Chen et al., 2015). Apart from TFEB, parkin has been implicated in K63-linked poly-ubiquitination of SOD1 mutant proteins (Yung et al., 2016). Interestingly, overexpression of parkin in cells expressing SOD1A4V and SOD1G93A appeared to ameliorate mutant protein toxicity through ubiquitination while having no effect on cells expressing wild-type SOD1. Furthermore, inhibition of the autophagy-lysosome pathway, but not UPS, inhibited the cytoprotective effects of parkin in SOD1 mutant cells, suggesting that increasing parkin levels aids in clearance of misfolded SOD1 aggregates through an upregulation of autophagy (Yung et al., 2016). It has been hypothesized that parkin facilitates misfolded SOD1 aggresome formation, a precursor to pathogenic insoluble aggregates, followed by K63-linked poly-ubiquitination. This attracts autophagy adaptor proteins, such as p62, resulting in degradation of the aggresomes through autophagy-lysosome machinery (Yung et al., 2016). In addition to failure in clearing SOD1 protein aggregates, autophagy also fails to clear damaged mitochondria that are a common pathological feature of SOD1-ALS. In spinal motor neurons derived from SOD1G93A mice, there is a positive correlation between lysosomal deficits that alter endolysosomal trafficking, gross morphological defects in the mitochondria, and impaired degradation of the damaged mitochondria through mitophagy (Xie et al., 2015).

Early development of a SOD1 transgenic mouse model has made it possible to study autophagy function in SOD1-associated ALS, particularly in the context of disease progression. Mouse models reveal differential roles of autophagy. The high occurrence of autophagosomes, indicated by an increase in LC3-II levels, was the first evidence of increased autophagy in SOD1G93A mutant animals (Xie et al., 2015). To further examine the importance of autophagy in SOD1-ALS, the disease phenotype was studied in the background of BECN1 deficiency (Tokuda et al., 2016). BECN1 is an important regulator of autophagy at the initiation step. Becn1 haploinsufficient mice exhibited reduced autophagic activity (Nassif et al., 2014). Loss of BECN1 in mice expressing SOD1G127X impaired autophagic flux and further exacerbated SOD1 aggregation. This was accompanied by an early onset and faster progression of the disease along with a significantly shorter lifespan in these animals (Tokuda et al., 2016). These phenotypes are also complemented by an increase in SOD1G127X protein aggregates (Tokuda et al., 2016). In contrast, BECN1 deficiency in SOD1G86R mice had the opposite effect on disease progression, with a significant delay in disease onset and increased animal lifespan (Nassif et al., 2014). Thus, despite the evidence in in vitro systems supporting reduced autophagy function in SOD1-ALS, in vivo systems indicate a more complex, distinct role of autophagy based on the particular SOD1 mutation. Interestingly, autophagy also seems to have differential roles at different stages of the disease. A group that investigated the effects of inducing autophagy by restricting food intake to emulate starvation conditions showed that activating autophagy at the onset of the disease, rather than late stage, had beneficial effects (Zhang et al., 2013).

Early symptomatic stages of the SOD1G93A mouse model also exhibited impaired degradation of damaged mitochondria through mitophagy (Xie et al., 2015). The most prominent feature was observed in axon exit zones of the ventral root where there was accumulation of abnormal autolysosomes called multilamellar bodies (MLBs) and amphisome-like structures around damaged mitochondria with elevated ROS production. This model indicates autophagy dysfunction that is most likely caused by defects in endosomal trafficking (Xie et al., 2015). Improving the endosomal trafficking through overexpression of snapin, an adaptor protein that coordinates dynein-driven retrograde transport of late endosomes, rescues mitochondrial pathology and motor neuron loss in the mice (Xie et al., 2015).

TAR DNA-Binding Protein 43 (TDP-43)

The transactive DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a heterogeneous nuclear protein that is a prominent feature of ubiquitinated cytoplasmic inclusions observed in ALS and FTLD patients (Neumann et al., 2006). TDP-43 is primarily involved in RNA metabolism, including, mRNA and miRNA processing, alternative splicing, transport and stability (Scotter et al., 2015). Mutations in TDP-43 contribute to 4%–5% of fALS and nearly 1% of sALS cases, and most of the mutations are concentrated in the C-terminus of the protein (Millecamps et al., 2010). TDP-43 immunopositive inclusions were found in the motor cortices and spinal cords of nearly 97% of fALS and sALS patients, suggesting an important consequence for the aggregation of the protein into inclusions (Sreedharan et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2014).

A plausible mechanism is that sequestration of TDP-43 in these aggregates prevents it from carrying out its function, which results in cellular toxicity. One of its target mRNAs codes for the autophagy-related protein, ATG7, thus TDP-43 may play a role in regulating autophagy (Bose et al., 2011). ALS-causing mutations in TDP-43 impair its ability to bind and stabilize ATG7 mRNA, thus leading to autophagy dysfunction (Bose et al., 2011). This indicates that TDP-43 aggregation in the cytoplasm causes autophagy impairment, or vice versa. Further evidence linking TDP-43 to autophagy regulation has pointed to the involvement of the transcription factor TFEB (Xia et al., 2016). In neuronal cells, one study reported that TDP-43 regulated autophagy by affecting the localization of TFEB, thus affecting the expression of its transcription targets that code for autophagy and lysosomal proteins (Xia et al., 2016). In addition, TDP-43 has been shown to help autophagosome-autolysosome fusion through regulation of DCTN1 levels (Xia et al., 2016). This further supports the model that TDP-43 regulates autophagy, and thus regulates its own turnover. Aggregates containing caspase-cleaved forms of the protein, TDP-25 and TDP-35, are a common feature in the brains of some ALS patients (Neumann et al., 2006). Importantly, these small fragments of TDP-43 have been shown to cause toxicity when expressed in cellular and animal models, such as Drosophila and mouse (Lagier-Tourenne et al., 2010; Casci and Pandey, 2015). When autophagy was chemically inhibited using 3MA (3-Methyladenine), the levels of TDP-25 and TDP-35 increased due to decreased turnover of these fragments, further supporting the notion that TDP-43 protein fragments are managed by autophagy pathway (Brady et al., 2011). In contrast, administration of rapamycin or trehalose, autophagy inducers, increased fragment turnover and reduced cytoplasmic mislocalization and aggregation of TDP-43 (Caccamo et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010). While the specific mechanism of TDP-43-induced autophagy dysfunction is still under study, an overall upregulation of autophagy seems to be an area of therapeutic potential.

The effect of inducing autophagy at different stages of the ALS pathogenesis has been explored in a TDP-43 proteinopathy mouse model. In an FTLD-U mouse model that forms TDP-43 aggregates, rapamycin administration at early stages rescued the motor deficits and neuronal loss, while at a later stage it effectively reduced TDP-43 ubiquitinated inclusions (Wang I.-F. et al., 2013). Autophagy dysregulation has also been reported in a study examining the effects of TDP-25 overexpression and aggregation in vivo (Caccamo et al., 2015). Similar to in vitro studies, the TDP-25 mouse model showed impaired protein turnover of TDP-25 within aggregates. These mice exhibited reduced levels of autophagy-initiation markers, indicating that impaired protein turnover was most likely a consequence of reduced autophagy (Caccamo et al., 2015). However, the effect of inducing autophagy in this mouse model has not yet been investigated. Similar to mice, overexpression of endogenous TDP-43 in Drosophila resulted in formation of aggregates within neurons, accompanied by diminished lifespan and locomotive defects (Cheng C.-W. et al., 2015). These phenotypes were rescued by inducing autophagy, further supporting the protective effects of autophagy induction in vivo (Cheng C.-W. et al., 2015).

Fused in Sarcoma (FUS)

FUS belongs to the FET family of proteins that, like TDP-43, is also a heterogeneous ribonuclear protein with roles in mRNA transcription, transport, trafficking, and alternative splicing (Deng et al., 2014). Mutations in FUS were discovered in fALS cases in 2009. Since then, over 40 mutations in FUS have been reported (Kwiatkowski et al., 2009; Vance et al., 2009). Collectively, these mutations account for about 4% of fALS and 1% of sALS cases (Deng et al., 2014). A unique feature of FUS mutations is the significant effect of heterogeneity in prognosis of the disease. For example, the P525L mutation causes juvenile (early twenties) ALS, whereas mutations such as R521C and R518K are associated with late-onset disease presentation (forties to sixties; Deng et al., 2014).

In addition to ALS-associated cytoplasmic mislocalization and formation of aggregates, FUS is also known to be a major component of cytoplasmic stress granules. In the case of FUS mutations, cellular stress can initiate the formation of mRNA and protein-containing dynamic foci called stress granules (Bosco et al., 2010). FUS proteins that mislocalize to the cytoplasm are trapped into these stress granules and are not released even after the stressor is removed (Daigle et al., 2016). In addition, these FUS-containing stress granules co-localize to autophagosomes (Ryu et al., 2014). In primary neurons expressing a mutant form of FUS, a reduction in autophagy increased the number of FUS-positive stress granules. This effect was reversed in these neurons when autophagy was induced using rapamycin (Ryu et al., 2014). This suggests an important role for autophagy in the formation of pathogenic stress granules and recruitment of FUS protein into these granules. One study provided evidence of FUSP525L and FUSR522G mutations directly impairing autophagy in neuronal cell lines and primary cortical neurons (Soo et al., 2015). Mutant FUS expression resulted in formation of fewer omegasomes, a precursor to autophagososomes, compared to expression of wild-type FUS. In addition, the early autophagosomes formed in mutant FUS-expressing cells recruited lesser ATG9 and lipidated LC3-II, both of which are required for autophagy initiation and elongation (Soo et al., 2015). This suggests that FUS mutations have a negative impact in the early stages of autophagosome synthesis, thus inhibiting autophagy. Interestingly, overexpression of Rab1 in these cells rescued the stress granule, omegasome, and autophagosome pathologies. Rab1 is normally involved in the trafficking of autophagosomes to lysosomes during autophagy. Restoration of autophagy upon Rab1 overexpression in mutant FUS-expressing cells suggests that mutant FUS might also be responsible for disrupting autophagosome-lysosome fusion through perturbation of Rab1 function (Soo et al., 2015). Further investigation into the role of autophagy in FUS-ALS could benefit from development of in vivo models that show incorporation of FUS into cytoplasmic stress granules and the subsequent effect of upregulation of autophagy.

Chromosome 9 Open Reading Frame 72 (C9orf72)

Expansion of GGGGCC intronic HREs in the C9orf72 gene is the most commonly identified cause of ALS, occurring in approximately 40% of fALS and 7% of sALS cases (Majounie et al., 2012). The pathogenic mechanisms that cause C9orf72 HRE-mediated toxicity in motor neurons of ALS patients are still heavily under investigation. Three potential mechanisms have so far come to light: haploinsufficiency caused by loss-of-function of the C9orf72 gene, sense and antisense RNA foci toxicity, and accumulation of toxic DPR proteins, which are closely associated with TDP-43 aggregation (Mackenzie et al., 2013; Mori et al., 2013).

Although multiple studies have investigated the pathogenesis of C9orf72-associated ALS, little is known about the function of the endogenous protein. In primary mouse cortical neurons, depletion of C9orf72 lead to p62 aggregate formation, which is one of primary pathological features of ALS/FTLD patients with expanded C9orf72 repeats. These data suggest that C9orf72 may have a direct role in maintaining protein homeostasis (Sellier et al., 2016; Sullivan et al., 2016). In human spinal cord motor neurons of patients with C9orf72 expansion, the protein co-localized with Rab7 and Rab11 at a higher frequency than controls (Farg et al., 2014). Rab7 and Rab11 are members of small GTPase family of proteins that facilitate autophagy by assisting in endo-lysosomal trafficking (Wang et al., 2011; Szatmári et al., 2014). Consistent with this, there has been a recent bout of evidence implicating C9orf72 as a GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factor) effector for Rab GTPases (Sellier et al., 2016; Sullivan et al., 2016; Webster et al., 2016). This implicates a direct role for endogenous C9orf72 in autophagy through its GEF effector activity. Another study suggested that C9orf72 forms a complex with two other proteins, Smith-Magenis Syndrome Chromosome Region, Candidate 8 (SMCR8) and WD repeat domain 41 (WDR41), and this complex acted as a GEF for Rab GTPases such as Rab39b, Rab8a and Rab1a, thereby facilitating their role in endocytic trafficking in autophagy (Sullivan et al., 2016). In an alternative mechanism, C9orf72 bound to Rab1a and ULK1 (of the autophagy initiation complex) which aided Rab1a-dependent trafficking of the autophagy initiation complex to the phagophore and subsequent formation of autophagosomes (Webster et al., 2016). Loss of C9orf72 also failed to initiate autophagy in neurons treated with autophagy inducer (Webster et al., 2016). These data suggest that C9orf72 plays a critical role in the autophagy pathway, more specifically, in the initiation stage of autophagy. Together this presents a loss-of-function model for C9orf72 repeat expansion–associated ALS/FTLD in which the C9orf72 HRE perturbs its function in the Rab cascade during autophagy initiation. This, in turn, could affect the downstream processes of autophagy and clearance of toxic aggregates, ultimately leading to neurodegeneration.

On the other hand, contrary evidence points to increased autophagic flux and lysosomal degradation in both in vitro and in vivo models of C9orf72 deficiency (Ugolino et al., 2016). This particular study observed that loss of C9orf72 lead to reduced mTOR signaling and increased TFEB activity, both of which could contribute to autophagy activation. Nutrient starvation of C9orf72-knockout mice resulted in increased autophagic flux accompanied by increased levels of TFEB and its lysosomal targets (Ugolino et al., 2016). To account for the apparent contradictory roles of C9orf72 haploinsufficiency in autophagy, the authors argued that C9orf72 may have a multifunctional role where it regulates autophagy initiation and also autophagic flux (Ugolino et al., 2016). All studies so far have utilized cellular and animal models in which C9orf72 has been knocked down or knocked out. Further studies in either patient-derived iPSC motor neurons (Almeida et al., 2013) that exhibit C9orf72-haploinsufficiency or other models that express the C9orf72 ALS-associated GGGGCC expansion (Haeusler et al., 2016) could give more insight into the role of autophagy in C9orf72-ALS.

Ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2)

UBQLN2 is a multi-domain member of the UBL-UBA family of proteins, in which the UBL (ubiquitin-like) and UBA (ubiquitin-associated) domains facilitate their dual role in autophagy and ubiquitin-proteasome systems (Osaka et al., 2016). The UBA domain facilitates binding of UBQLN2 to polyubiquitinated proteins, and the UBL domain facilitates delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to proteasomes (Osaka et al., 2016). In autophagy, ubiquilins have been shown to act as autophagy receptors by recruiting autophagosomes to polyubiquitinated aggregates through interaction with LC3, thus aiding in aggregate clearance (Rothenberg et al., 2010). Mutations in UBQLN2 were discovered in patients with fALS, providing a direct association between disease pathogenesis and impaired clearance of toxic aggregates (Osaka et al., 2016).

In cell culture systems, evidences for the role of UBQLN2 and the consequences of ALS-associated mutations in autophagy have been limited. UBQLN2 has been implicated in affecting protein turnover, including TDP-43, since overexpression of ALS-associated UBQLN2 mutations in neuronal cells increased TDP-43 levels and promoted aggregation (Osaka et al., 2016). The same study also showed that the UBQLN21Vm mutation disrupted its interaction with autophagy proteins ATG9 and ATG16L1 (Osaka et al., 2016). Both proteins are present on autophagosome surfaces and facilitate binding of autophagosomes to lysosome. This indicates that UBQLN2 mutations possibly disrupt its incorporation into autophagosomes.

Transgenic rats expressing UBQLN2P497H recapitulated features of UBQLN2-related ALS, including protein aggregates that contained the mutant UBQLN2, motor neuron loss, cortex structure deformations, and progressive accumulation of p62 and LC3-II proteins within the aggregates (Wu et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016). Aggregates formed by the mutant protein within rat neurons also sequestered endogenous UBQLN2, suggesting it may contribute to toxicity via a dominant-negative mechanism (Wu et al., 2015). The rats also had a lower number of early endosomes, which indicated defects in the early endosome pathway. While these results indicate defective protein degradation, the specific role of UBQLN2 mutations in autophagy remains unclear. One hypothesis is that UBQLN2 interacts with OPTN at endosomal vesicles and act in concert to facilitate endosome trafficking during autophagy (Osaka et al., 2015). However, the interaction has not been investigated in the context of UBQLN2 ALS-associated mutations. Considering its dual role in UPS and autophagy, it is yet to be determined if the ALS-associated mutations in UBQLN2 or OPTN affect protein degradation predominantly through one, or both, pathways.

Optineurin (OPTN)

OPTN is a cytoplasmic protein that plays an important role in vesicle trafficking, autophagy and NF-kB signal transduction (Ying and Yue, 2012). OPTN mutations constitute about 1–4% of fALS cases, with one of the mutations falling in the ubiquitin-binding UBAN domain of the protein (Li et al., 2016).

OPTN acts as an autophagy receptor whose role in degradation of damaged mitochondria has come to prominence. An important role for OPTN has been demonstrated in mitophagy, which is the selective degradation of damaged mitochondria by autophagy (Wong and Holzbaur, 2015). Under conditions of mitochondrial stress/damage, PINK1 recruits the E3-ubiquitin ligase, PARK1, to the outer mitochondrial membrane to ubiquitinate proteins. OPTN, an autophagy adapter, binds to the ubiquitinated protein and promotes autophagosome formation around the mitochondria, thus aiding in mitophagy (Wong and Holzbaur, 2015). This function of OPTN is inhibited by the ALS-associated mutation, E478G, which has deficient ubiquitin-binding abilities, and also by F178A, which has impaired LC3 recruitment (Wong and Holzbaur, 2015). This points toward a loss-of-function in autophagy for OPTN in ALS. This is further supported by the observation that damaged mitochondria were not degraded efficiently in OPTN-depleted cells (Wong and Holzbaur, 2015). A closer look at the kinetics of mitophagy in parkin-expressing cells revealed that after mitochondrial depolarization or ROS production, OPTN-mediated autophagosome formation around the mitochondria was preceded by TANK-binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) phosphorylation of OPTN (Moore and Holzbaur, 2016). This interaction was lost when TBK1 carried the ALS-associated mutation, E696K. A similar effect was observed for OPTN mutants, E478G and R398X, resulting in failed mitophagy (Wong and Holzbaur, 2015; Moore and Holzbaur, 2016). However, there is conflicting data that points to no evident mitophagy defects 24 h post-mitochondrial depolarization even in the case of OPTN deficiency (Lazarou et al., 2015). This suggests that there might be compensatory mechanisms at play, which contrasts with the theory of loss-of-function in OPTN-ALS.

In addition to playing a role in mitophagy, OPTN might also regulate autophagic flux (Shen et al., 2015). A study investigating the link between OPTN and UBQLN2 autophagy receptors found that both proteins co-localized to the same cellular component on recycling endosomes. Recycling endosomes are thought to contribute to autophagosome formation (Longatti and Tooze, 2012). ALS-linked mutations in both proteins affected the formation of recycling endosomes, suggesting that these mutations affected autophagosome formation. Conversely, another study investigating the effects of OPTN mutations within the ubiquitin-binding domain reported that OPTN mutations affected autophagosome turnover by inhibiting fusion with lysosomes rather than affecting autophagosome formation itself (Shen et al., 2015). A possible explanation could be that OPTN plays a dual role where it facilitates autophagosome fusion with lysosomes and also interacts with UBQLN2 on the surface of recycling endosomes to contribute to autophagosome formation.

Sequestosome 1/p62 (SQSTM1/p62)

SQSTM1, or p62, is an autophagy receptor protein that also has other roles in NF-kB signaling, Keap1/Nrf2 activation, and apoptosis (Rea et al., 2013). SQSTM1/p62 is also known to interact with mTOR and regulates the translocation of mTOR to lysosomes (Duran et al., 2011). SQSTM1 has been associated with many other neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington disease, where p62/SQSTM1 is a predominant component of the toxic inclusions formed in the neurons. This indicates that SQSTM1 plays an important role in clearance of the inclusions (Wooten et al., 2006).

Mutations in SQSTM1 have been discovered in rare cases of individuals with ALS/FTLD, and a majority of the mutations are associated with defective ubiquitin-recognition by the UBA domain of the protein (Rea et al., 2013). Another domain of interest with ALS/FTLD-linked mutations is the LC3-interacting region (LIR) domain, which is responsible for recruitment of autophagosomes to ubiquitinated substrates and subsequent degradation by autophagy (Rea et al., 2013). Absence of SQSTM1/p62 has been linked to defects in mitophagy owing to compromised autophagosome formation following mitochondrial depolarization (Haack et al., 2016). The effect SQSTM1/p62 loss-of-function has also been tested in vivo in zebrafish where knockdown of sqstm1 led to development of abnormal motor behavior and disrupted arborization and shortening of motor neurons (Lattante et al., 2015). The neurodegenerative phenotypes were rescued with rapamycin administration, suggesting that loss of SQSTM1/p62 has deleterious effects through disruption of autophagy. In cell culture, the ALS-associated mutation in the LC3-binding domain of the protein, L341V, resulted in failed LC3 binding and incorporation of autophagic cargo into phagophores (Goode et al., 2016). This phenotype was also rescued by rapamycin, again supporting a pathogenic role for autophagy in SQSTM1-ALS (Goode et al., 2016). In vitro and in vivo studies thus far have leaned more towards a loss-of-function hypothesis for SQSTM1 mutations, where the protein’s role in degradation pathways could be disrupted by the mutations. However, analysis of protein expression in spinal cord of patients with mutations in SQSTM1 reveals an increase in the level of proteins, suggesting a gain-of-function (Teyssou et al., 2013). It remains to be determined if SQSTM1 mutations in ALS/FTLD acts via a loss- or gain-of-function mechanism, as well as its consequence on autophagy regulation.

Dynactin (DCTN1)

DCTN1 is an important protein in the retrograde transport of vesicles and organelles along microtubules via interaction with the motor protein, dynein (Laird et al., 2008). DCTN1 mutations are found only in a very small subset of patients with ALS (Münch et al., 2004). Nevertheless, studies so far implicate a strong role for DCTN1 mutations in vesicle transport defects in autophagy.

The ALS-associated mutation, G59S, impairs autophagic clearance of aggregated proteins and alters vesicular trafficking that manifests as accumulation of autophagosomes in motor neurons in mice (Laird et al., 2008). The dynamics of disrupted endocytic trafficking were better observed in a dctn1-deficient C. elegans model. The dctn1-deficient worms exhibited motor neuronal defects, decreased lifespan, decreased speed in movement, and axonal degeneration (Ikenaka et al., 2013). Live cell imaging of these mutant animals revealed impaired autophagosome transport and accumulation of untransported autophagosomes in the areas of axonal defects (Ikenaka et al., 2013). Moreover, induction of autophagy in this model through starvation, as well as rapamycin administration, strongly ameliorated the motor dysfunction and increased the frequency of autophagosome movement (Ikenaka et al., 2013). While these phenotypes could be interpreted as dysregulation in autophagosome transport, it is important to note that DCTN1 is an essential protein involved in transport of various cargoes and thus the effects observed could just be a by-product of defective cargo-transport machinery.

Autophagy: Converging Point for Other Pathogenic Mechanisms

When examining age-related neurodegeneration in ALS, it is important to consider the crosstalk between autophagy and cellular dysfunctions in ALS that may contribute to autophagy dysregulation. Growing evidence supports the notion of potential crosstalk between different pathways in ALS and it is very likely that other biological pathways may directly or indirectly impact autophagy, and vice versa. The mechanisms that interact with autophagy in neurons could contribute to autophagy dysregulation in ALS in multiple ways—(i) either the pathways activate autophagy downstream and this crosstalk is perturbed in ALS; (ii) the downstream activation of autophagy in these pathways could overwhelm the autophagy pathway, resulting in toxic effect; or (iii) the other pathogenic mechanisms work in conjunction with a failed autophagy system, pushing the cells over the edge and thus causing neurodegeneration. Nevertheless, investigation of the crosstalk between the mechanisms may elucidate the role of autophagy itself by drawing attention to molecular links that could be further studied for determining early disease therapeutic interventions.

Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a crucial organelle in which both membrane proteins and secreted proteins are synthesized and modified for protein folding. In a cell, more than one-third of the proteins synthesized are misfolded (Guerriero and Brodsky, 2012). Disruption in the protein-folding capacity of the ER and/or increased accumulation of misfolded proteins leads to ER stress. To restore protein homeostasis, a mechanism called the unfolded protein response (UPR) is triggered to decrease the load of unfolded proteins through various pathways (Guerriero and Brodsky, 2012). However, in certain cellular conditions, including but not restricted to nutrient deprivation and missense mutations, protein folding is enhanced, which results in severe ER stress (Guerriero and Brodsky, 2012). Prolonged ER stress causes an accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins, which eventually leads to apoptosis. There are several reports that support the presence of ER stress in the motor neurons of both fALS and sALS (Ilieva et al., 2007). In silico analyses of motor neurons from transgenic mutant SOD1 mice revealed ER stress to be an early pathological feature (Vlug et al., 2005; Atkin et al., 2006) In addition, ER stress has also been associated with TDP-43- and FUS-ALS (Vlug et al., 2005; Atkin et al., 2006). The mutant forms of these proteins induce either one or all three of the different UPR activators in the central nervous system—Protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), Endoplasmic reticulum to nucleus signaling 1 (ERN1) and Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6; Vlug et al., 2005; Atkin et al., 2006; Farg et al., 2012; Walker et al., 2013). Interestingly, each of the three UPR pathways has been shown to stimulate autophagy to relieve cellular stress or, in extreme cases, induce apoptosis (Figure 1A).

Figure 1

Cross-talk between autophagy and other pathogenic mechanisms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (A) endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein response (UPR) is triggered by mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (mSOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) and fused in sarcoma (FUS). Accumulation of misfolded mutant proteins activates either one or all three UPR pathways—protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), endoplasmic reticulum to nucleus signaling 1 (ERN1) and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Each of the pathways stimulate autophagy through downstream activators. ERN1 activates autophagy through three pathways—(i) the AMPK pathway phosphorylates and activates two proteins—ULK1 and tuberous sclerosis protein 1/2 (TSC1/2)—both of which inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) which leads to initiation of autophagy; (ii) ERN1 activates mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 (MAPK8), which uses its kinase activity to phosphorylate B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) which is in a complex with Beclin-1 (BECN1). This phosphorylation disrupts the complex and releases BECN1, which in turn activates autophagy through mTORC1 inhibition; (iii) ERN1 also acts an endoribonuclease to splice XBP1. The spliced version of XBP1 (XBP1s) promotes expression of BECN1. The UPR activator ATF6 activates the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (CEBPB) that promotes expression of the kinase death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1). DAPK1 phosphorylates BECN1 and thus breaks it from its complex with BCL2. The free BECN1 now activates autophagy through mTORC1 inhibition. The third UPR activator, PERK, activates the expression of two stress response genes—activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3). These genes promote the transcription of autophagy-related genes (ATGs) that activate the process. (B) Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction are complimentary mechanisms that are triggered by mutations in optineurin (mOPTN), TDP-43, SQSTM1/p62, SOD1 and C9orf72 GGGGCC expansion. Mitochondrial dysfunction is the primary source of reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) that are directly implicated in activating autophagy. An alternative mechanism is through the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)-nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) pathways. Oxidative stress KEAP1-NRF2 complex is disrupted. This leaves NRF2 free to translocate to the nucleus where it induces the expression of several autophagy-related genes. Autophagy also acts to clear damaged mitochondria through an organelle-specific mechanism called mitophagy. (C) RNA metabolism defect is a major pathological outcome of mutations in RNA-binding proteins, especially FUS and TDP-43. These proteins are major components of stress granules and mutations in low complexity domains of these proteins alter the phase of stress granules to give them a complex liquid state. This alters the dynamics of stress granules, in that, they are not cleared and potentially act as primers for protein aggregates. Autophagy is a crucial mechanism involved in the clearance of stress granules under normal conditions and dysfunction in autophagy could be linked to altered stress granule dynamics. (D) DNA damage, either caused as a direct result of pathogenic mutation or triggered by oxidative stress, is a common pathological feature of mutations in FUS and C9orf72 GGGGCC expansion. DNA damage activates autophagy through activation of AMPK pathway. The AMPK pathway phosphorylates and activates two proteins, ULK1 and TSC1/2, both of which independently act as mTORC1 inhibitors. DNA damage activates the AMPK pathways through: (i) Hyperactivation of PARP1, which leads to a depletion of NAD+ reserves in the cell. This, in turn, depletes ATP and thus activates AMPK; or (ii) FOXOa3 dissociation from DNA that allows it to interact with ATM. Activation of ATM by phosphorylation leads to downstream activation of AMPK pathway. Alternatively, FOXOa3 also acts as a transcription factor that regulates expression of autophagy-related genes.

The PERK pathway works through downstream activation of stress response genes. Of these, Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3), independently and together, promote transcription of several autophagy genes, including MAP1LC3B, BECN1, ATG3, ATG12, ATG16L1, SQSTM1, Neighbor of Brca1 (NBR1), ATG7, ATG10, GABA Type A receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) and ATG5, thereby inducing autophagy (B’chir et al., 2013). ATF4 expression was also upregulated in PERK-activated cells through phosphorylation of EIF2α, both of which were detected in their activated forms in mutant SOD1 models (Matus et al., 2013).

Following ER stress, ERN1 activates autophagy through more than one pathway. The first is through the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway, which induces autophagy through mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORC1) inhibition (Rashid et al., 2015). The second, more predominant pathway is via Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 (MAPK8)-mediated phosphorylation of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2). This disrupts BCL2’s interaction with BECN1, freeing it to activate autophagy (Rashid et al., 2015). ERN1 induces BECN1 activity also through an alternative mechanism that uses its endoribonuclease activity to produce spliced X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1) that, in turn, promotes BECN1 expression (Rashid et al., 2015).

ATF6 activator also induces autophagy through BECN1. The ATF6-associated transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (CEBPB) promotes expression of Death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1; Kalvakolanu and Gade, 2012). Activated DAPK1 phosphorylates BECN1, stimulating dissociation of the phosphorylated BECN1 from its complex with BCL2. This frees BECN1 to induce autophagy (Kalvakolanu and Gade, 2012).

Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondrial dysfunction in ALS can be manifested through multiple pathogenic mechanisms, including impaired oxidative phosphorylation complexes (OXPHOS), reduced respiration and ATP synthesis, disrupted calcium homeostasis and increased ROS production (Muyderman and Chen, 2014). The primary link between mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy is through mitophagy (Zhang, 2013). The dysfunctional mitochondria are ubiquitinated by autophagy receptors, including OPTN, UBQLN2, VCP and TBK1 (Wong and Holzbaur, 2014, 2015; Guo et al., 2016; Hjerpe et al., 2016; Moore and Holzbaur, 2016). ALS-associated mutations in these proteins lead to disrupted clearance of damaged mitochondria. The role of impaired mitophagy in the pathogenesis of ALS has been discussed in the previous section. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also the primary source of ROS production, which leads to elevation of oxidative stress and subsequent oxidative stress-induced autophagy (Figure 1B).

Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress been firmly established in the etiology of ALS, caused by an imbalance between the production of ROS and other oxidants and elimination of these species by the cellular antioxidant defense system (D’Amico et al., 2013). Neurons use 10 times more oxygen than other tissues, making them especially vulnerable to oxidative stress (Lee et al., 2012). The main source of ROS in autophagy signaling occurs via mitochondrial damage/dysfunction, the role of which has been discussed elaborately in the previous section. The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway is another mechanism through which oxidative stress induces autophagy (Figure 1B). Under basal conditions, Keap1 negatively regulates Nrf2 through direct association. However, under oxidative stress, binding is disrupted and Nrf2 is free to translocate to the cytoplasm where it regulates the expression of multiple autophagy genes (Gan and Johnson, 2014). Keap1-Nrf2 pathway was altered in animal models of ALS as well as in post-mortem tissues derived from patients (Kanno et al., 2012). In addition, Keap1 immunoreactivity has been detected in the skein-like inclusions from the spinal cords of ALS patients, possibly through an interaction with p62/SQSTM1, a protein that has been observed in several ALS inclusions (Goode et al., 2016). Another mechanism of oxidative stress-induced autophagy in ALS is through stress granule formation and subsequent degradation of stress granules by autophagy (Finelli et al., 2015). In fact, when the oxidative stress resistance protein (Oxr1) was upregulated in neuronal cells, FUS and TDP-43’s cytoplasmic mislocalization and aggregation was significantly reduced (Finelli et al., 2015). This suggests an important pathogenic role of oxidative stress in stress granule formation in FUS- and TDP-43- associated ALS. In addition to acting through ROS, oxidative stress also has the potential to change the native conformations of proteins, potentially increasing their propensity to aggregate. Degradation of such protein aggregates through autophagy provides yet another link between oxidative stress and autophagy (Figure 1B).

DNA Damage

Oxidative stress and DNA damage go hand in hand; oxidative stress results in years of accumulation of DNA damage. In ALS individuals—especially in the early stages of the disease—increased oxidative DNA damage has been observed, accompanied by a widespread increase in poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP1) and expression of enzymes involved in base-excision repair (Coppedè, 2011). When DNA is damaged, PARP1 binds to the DNA and polymerizes to form PAR (polyadenosine diphosphate ribose) chains. This signals the recruitment of various DNA damage repair proteins, including FUS (Coppedè, 2011). The role of FUS in DNA damage response/repair and the consequence of ALS-associated mutations on its function have been explored in a number of studies (Sama et al., 2014). ALS-associated FUSR521C transgenic mice showed a robust increase in DNA damage repair defects in cortical and spinal motor neurons (Qiu et al., 2014). It has been suggested that DNA damage caused by double-stranded breaks stimulates wild-type FUS recruitment to DNA damage foci where it interacts with chromatin remodeling factor, HDAC1 (histone deacetylase 1). However, this interaction was shown to be impaired in FUSR521C, thus limiting its function in DNA damage repair (Wang W.-Y. et al., 2013; Qiu et al., 2014). Increased DNA damage pathology in ALS has also been successfully reproduced in human iPSC-derived motor neurons expressing mutant FUS (Higelin et al., 2016). In addition to FUS, a recent study observed an age-dependent increase in DNA damage pathology in motor neurons differentiated from iPSCs derived from C9orf72 patients. This was possibly through a mechanism involving mitochondrial dysfunction followed by increased oxidative stress, which led to an accumulation of DNA damage (Lopez-Gonzalez et al., 2016).

As the role of DNA damage in ALS and the potential to target DNA damage in early stages of the disease becomes increasingly prominent, it is interesting to note that DNA damage-repair acts as a cytoprotective mechanism by inducing DNA damage repair mechanisms, and also by inducing autophagy (Figure 1D). DNA damage leads to an induction of autophagy primarily through activation of the AMPK pathway (Eliopoulos et al., 2016). The AMPK pathway is responsible for downstream phosphorylation of two proteins—ULK1 and Tuberous sclerosis protein 1/2 (TSC1/2)—both of which are inhibitors of mTORC1 and subsequent autophagy initiation (Czarny et al., 2015). When DNA is damaged, hyperactivation of PARP1 leads to depletion of NAD+ reserves in the cell. This causes a decrease in ATP levels leading to downstream activation of AMPK pathway. An alternative pathway of AMPK activation occurs via dissociation of FOXO3 from DNA during DNA damage (Eliopoulos et al., 2016). Free FOXO3 interacts with ATM, which activates the AMPK pathway and leads to subsequent induction of autophagy (Figure 1D). FOXO3 also acts as a transcription factor that aids in autophagy activation by regulating transcription of ATGs, including LC3 and BNIP3 (Czarny et al., 2015).

RNA Metabolism Defects

Cytoplasmic mislocalization and formation of aggregates in either the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus by RNA-binding proteins is a hallmark of multiple neurodegenerative disorders (Ugras and Shorter, 2012). ALS-associated RNA-binding proteins, including FUS, TDP-43, hnRNPA1, hnRNPA2B1 and MATR3, are all involved in RNA metabolism with roles in pre-mRNA splicing (Ugras and Shorter, 2012). These RNA-binding proteins translocate to the nucleus along with mRNA. Until mRNA translation, they sequester mRNA into membrane-less organelles called ribonucleoprotein granules (RNPs). There are two main types of RNPs: P-bodies and stress granules (Fan and Leung, 2016). Stress granules are formed in the cell under conditions of high stress and act to repress translation initiation of the mRNAs. These stress granules have a complex liquid state that arise via phase separation that is facilitated by the low complexity domains present in the RNA-binding proteins (Patel et al., 2015; Conicella et al., 2016; Boeynaems et al., 2017). A lot of ALS-related mutations occur in the low complexity domains. This could attribute to alterations in stress granule dynamics and result in irreversible stress granule formations that are primers for aggregation (Figure 1C). Disrupted assembly, disassembly, and clearance of stress granules has been associated with multiple models of ALS (Conicella et al., 2016; Boeynaems et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2015). Autophagy has been shown to be a crucial mechanism in the clearance of stress granules (Buchan et al., 2013). Inhibition of either autophagy or lysosome formation, or compromising VCP function through ALS-related mutations have all been shown to alter stress granule assembly and disassembly (Buchan et al., 2013; Seguin et al., 2014). In addition, stress granules that form under conditions of autophagy inhibition accumulate cellular components, such as defective ribosomal products (DRiPs) and 60s ribosomal subunits, that are not otherwise accumulated (Seguin et al., 2014). These, in turn, contribute to defective stress granule dynamics that persist in diseased cells, thus acting as seeds for aggregation.

Therapeutic Implications

Autophagy-modulating drugs have been studied for treating various human neurodegenerative diseases as well as aging (Ballou and Lin, 2008; Díaz-Troya et al., 2008). The therapeutic potential of autophagy induction has been explored in different models of ALS. Rapamycin, shown to have a neuroprotective role in neurodegeneration, reduced aberrant protein aggregation in TDP-43 and SOD1 models of ALS (Wang I.-F. et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). On the other hand, contradictory evidence in mice has shown that rapamycin worsens motor neuron degeneration and life span of SOD1 mutant mice (Zhang et al., 2011). This paradox suggests that rapamycin might have off-target effects that manifest in certain neurodegeneration models, highlighting the need for developing autophagy modulators with higher specificity. Use of mTOR-independent autophagy inducer, trehalose, has been shown to ameliorate SOD1 mutant toxicity and protein aggregation—albeit only in early stages of the disease—suggesting it may be a good therapeutic agent when administered in combination with other compounds (Zhang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015). Another compound that has presented conflicting results is lithium carbonate, a drug that has been conventionally used to treat bipolar disorder (Machado-Vieira et al., 2009). One study investigating the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS found that lithium administration reduced motor neuron loss and increased survival (Pizzasegola et al., 2009). Other groups using similar experimental conditions have provided contrary evidence in which the mutant mice developed earlier disease onset and exhibited reduced lifespans (Fornai et al., 2008; Gill et al., 2009). While autophagy induction is a promising therapeutic strategy, these studies further support the need for developing more specific and targeted agents. In particular, high-throughput screens conducted in cells identified several novel small molecules that significantly modulate autophagy without leading to cytotoxicity (Zhang et al., 2007; Kuo et al., 2015).

The benefits of using high-specificity small molecule regulators of autophagy have been explored in several neurodegenerative diseases (Sarkar and Rubinsztein, 2008). In ALS, small molecule activators of autophagy have been shown to ameliorate toxicity in both TDP-43 and SOD1 mutant models of the disease. One notable study used a cell-based model to screen an in silico library that consisted of over a million potent autophagy activators (Barmada et al., 2014). The investigators identified two potential compounds that significantly stimulated autophagy: fluphenazine and methotrimeprazine. The compounds not only improved cell survival, but also reduced levels of TDP-43 and rescued its mislocalization (Barmada et al., 2014). Another study investigated the effects of the natural herb, berberine, which also exhibited therapeutic effects in TDP-43 proteinopathy through activation of autophagy (Chang et al., 2016). Berberine administration in a cell-based model increased metabolic rates and reduced aggregate formation of cleaved TDP-43 fragments (Chang et al., 2016). In addition to cell-based models, a different study used an FTLD-U mouse model of TDP-43 proteinopathy to study the effects of using small molecules to stimulate autophagy. This study used three chemical compounds—spermidine, tamoxifen and carbamazepine—that significantly improved the motor function of FTLD-U mice (Wang I.-F. et al., 2013). Activation of autophagy through the use of small molecules has also been shown to have therapeutic effects in SOD1 mutant mouse models. A natural compound called n-butylidenephthalide (n-BP) prolonged survival, improved motor functions, and reduced motor neuron loss in the spinal cords of SOD1-ALS mice (Hsueh et al., 2016). Interestingly, n-BP is known to regulate ER stress (Chiu et al., 2012), suggesting that n-BP may regulate autophagy in these mice through ER stress. Recently, the FDA approved a new drug called edaravone, also known as Radiciva, for the treatment of ALS (Yoshino and Kimura, 2006; Abe et al., 2014). The drug acts as a free radical scavenger and could thus significantly alleviate oxidative stress and delay neurodegeneration in ALS (Abe et al., 1988). This research opens up further avenues of modulating autophagy through targeting other pathogenic pathways that interact with autophagy, as described in the previous section.

Future Directions and Conclusion

Dysregulation in autophagy is emerging as a major pathogenic hallmark of ALS. Most evidence point to a reduction in autophagy in diseased neurons and the subsequent therapeutic effects of inducing autophagy. One potential mechanism through which autophagy dysregulation could be caused is by a direct dysfunction of proteins involved in protein degradation. This hypothesis was solidified by the discovery of ALS-causing mutations in these proteins. An alternative mechanism could be through a combined effect of autophagy defects along with other cellular stresses that depend on autophagy for their alleviation. Prominently, phase separation defects caused by mutations in RNA-binding proteins with a low complexity domain allow them to aggregate into stress granules in diseased neurons. These stress granules act as a seed for self-aggregation of these proteins as well as interacting proteins. Over the life of a neuron, these cellular insults accumulate to the point of motor neuron death. Development of therapeutics that specifically target upstream cellular events could aid in alleviating cellular stress. A combination therapy with drugs that upregulate autophagy could be a promising therapeutic strategy for ALS.

Author Contributions

NR wrote this review article. UBP edited and revised it.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.