Literature DB >> 28878611

Low-Level Chromosomal Mosaicism in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Beatrice Oneda1, Reza Asadollahi1, Silvia Azzarello-Burri1, Dunja Niedrist1, Rosa Baldinger1, Rahim Masood1, Albert Schinzel1, Bea Latal2, Oskar G Jenni2, Anita Rauch1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal mosaicism, which represents a diagnostic challenge for detection and interpretation, has been described in several genetic conditions. It can contribute to a large phenotypic variation in diseases. At analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 714 patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) of unknown etiology using a high-resolution chromosomal microarray platform, we found 2 cases (0.28%) of low-level mosaicism and defined a previously detected extra chromosome in a third patient. Two of the cases were mosaics for segmental imbalances (a partial trisomy 3q26.1q27.3 and a partial monosomy 18q21.2qter with 14.6 and 20% mosaic ratios in lymphocytes, respectively), and 1 was a mosaic for an entire chromosome (trisomy 14, mosaic ratio 20%). Our diagnostic yield is in line with the ratios previously published in patients with intellectual disability. Notably, the partial trisomy 3q26.1q27.3 case is an example of a rare and unusual class of a rearranged neocentric ring chromosome, which can neither be categorized in class I, nor in class II of such rearrangements. Our cases further elucidate the phenotypes related to the aberrations of the specific chromosome segments observed and underline the important role of low-level mosaics in the pathogenesis of NDDs of unknown etiology even in the absence of clinical signs of mosaicism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deletion 18q; Microarray; Mosaicism; Neocentromere; Neurodevelopmental disorders

Year:  2017        PMID: 28878611      PMCID: PMC5582502          DOI: 10.1159/000477189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Syndromol        ISSN: 1661-8769


  25 in total

1.  Analphoid 3qter markers.

Authors:  I Teshima; E V Bawle; R Weksberg; C Shuman; D L Van Dyke; S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-09-11

Review 2.  Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres.

Authors:  Laura S Burrack; Judith Berman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens.

Authors:  Blake C Ballif; Emily A Rorem; Kyle Sundin; Matt Lincicum; Shannon Gaskin; Justine Coppinger; Catherine D Kashork; Lisa G Shaffer; Bassem A Bejjani
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Pathogenic aberrations revealed exclusively by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping data in 5000 samples tested by molecular karyotyping.

Authors:  D L Bruno; S M White; D Ganesamoorthy; T Burgess; K Butler; S Corrie; D Francis; L Hills; K Prabhakara; C Ngo; F Norris; R Oertel; M D Pertile; Z Stark; D J Amor; H R Slater
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Laura K Conlin; Brian D Thiel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; Linda M Ernst; Elaine H Zackai; Matthew A Deardorff; Ian D Krantz; Hakon Hakonarson; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Definition of a critical region on chromosome 18 for congenital aural atresia by arrayCGH.

Authors:  Joris A Veltman; Yvonne Jonkers; Inge Nuijten; Irene Janssen; Walter van der Vliet; Erik Huys; Joris Vermeesch; Griet Van Buggenhout; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Ronald Admiraal; Paulien Terhal; Didier Lacombe; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Dominique Smeets; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Conny M van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Comparison of chromosome analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis: what is the value of chromosome analysis in today's genomic array era?

Authors:  Weimin Bi; Caroline Borgan; Amber N Pursley; Patricia Hixson; Chad A Shaw; Carlos A Bacino; Seema R Lalani; Ankita Patel; Pawel Stankiewicz; James R Lupski; Arthur L Beaudet; Sau Wai Cheung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Justin Pham; Chad Shaw; Amber Pursley; Patricia Hixson; Srirangan Sampath; Erin Roney; Tomasz Gambin; Sung-Hae L Kang; Weimin Bi; Seema Lalani; Carlos Bacino; James R Lupski; Pawel Stankiewicz; Ankita Patel; Sau-Wai Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Detection of low-level mosaicism and placental mosaicism by oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Stuart A Scott; Ninette Cohen; Tracy Brandt; Gokce Toruner; Robert J Desnick; Lisa Edelmann
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  International consensus recommendations on the diagnostic work-up for malformations of cortical development.

Authors:  Renske Oegema; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Martina Wilke; Katrien Stouffs; Dina Amrom; Eleonora Aronica; Nadia Bahi-Buisson; Valerio Conti; Andrew E Fry; Tobias Geis; David Gomez Andres; Elena Parrini; Ivana Pogledic; Edith Said; Doriette Soler; Luis M Valor; Maha S Zaki; Ghayda Mirzaa; William B Dobyns; Orly Reiner; Renzo Guerrini; Daniela T Pilz; Ute Hehr; Richard J Leventer; Anna C Jansen; Grazia M S Mancini; Nataliya Di Donato
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 42.937

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.