| Literature DB >> 28878450 |
Jeong Hoon Lee1, Eun Kyung Seo2, Jae Soon Shim3, Sung Pil Chung4.
Abstract
[Purpose] This research aimed to examine the effects of back massage and foot bath with blended essential oil on psychophysiological response in stroke patients.Entities:
Keywords: Foot bath; Massage; Psychophysiological response
Year: 2017 PMID: 28878450 PMCID: PMC5574341 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
General and medical characteristics of study participants
| Classification | Experimental group (n=7) | Control group (n=7) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64.3 ± 2.2 | 65.0 ± 5.0 |
| Gender (male/female) | 4/3 | 4/3 |
| Height (cm) | 168.9 ± 1.8 | 167.8 ± 2.9 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.4 ± 7.6 | 63.7 ± 7.1 |
| Duration of illness (months) | 13.0 ± 3.1 | 13.6 ± 1.4 |
| Causes (infraction/hemorrhage) | 3/4 | 3/4 |
All data are expressed as means with standard deviation (M ± SD).
Characteristics of essential oil
| Type of essential oil | Scientific name | Efficacy |
|---|---|---|
| Juniper | Juniperus communis | Stress, insomnia, detoxification and others |
| Lavender | Lavendula species | Stress, insomnia, anxiety and others |
| Orange | Citrus sinensis | Nerve strengthening, stress, calming, pain relieving and others |
| Patchouli | Pogostemom cablin | Stress, anxiety, inflammation, and others |
| Rosemary | Rosmarinus officinalis | Stress, blood circulation, pain and others |
Stress comparison according to the experimental conditions
| Group | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical stress | A | 37.0 ± 2.8 | 27.4 ± 4.3 | *** |
| B | 36.6 ± 3.9 | 31.6 ± 3.2 | ** | |
| t | 2.154 | 4.250 | ||
| p | 0.061 | 0.05* | ||
| Psycholo-emotional stress | A | 28.9 ± 3.1 | 22.9 ± 2.8 | *** |
| B | 27.9 ± 2.6 | 25.7 ± 2.4 | ** | |
| t | 2.410 | 5.012 | ||
| p | 0.074 | 0.01** | ||
All data are expressed as means with standard deviation (M ± SD).
A: experimental group; B: control group
A paired t-test was performed with respect to the differences in pre-post treatment (***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05)
A independent t-test was performed with respect to the differences among groups (***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05)
Comparison of body temperature, mood state, sleep satisfaction according to the experimental conditions
| Group | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body temperature(℃) | A | 35.2 ± 0.5 | 36.2 ± 0.4 | *** |
| B | 35.1 ± 0.5 | 35.9 ± 0.4 | *** | |
| t | 0.251 | 2.143 | ||
| p | 0.071 | 0.05* | ||
| Mood status | A | 24.3 ± 3.1 | 19.3 ± 2.9 | *** |
| B | 23.7 ± 2.7 | 22.4 ± 2.6 | *** | |
| t | 2.042 | 3.104 | ||
| p | 0.105 | 0.01* | ||
| Sleep satisfaction | A | 46.1 ± 6.4 | 59.4 ± 7.1 | *** |
| B | 45.9 ± 7.1 | 36.3 ± 5.3 | ** | |
| t | 1.904 | −10.471 | ||
| p | 0.120 | 0.001*** | ||
All data are expressed as means with standard deviation (M ± SD).
A: experimental group, B: control group
A paired t-test was performed with respect to the differences in pre-post treatment (***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05)
An independent t-test was performed with respect to the differences among groups (***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05)