Literature DB >> 28878443

Diagnostic performance of 11C-choline PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

Kazuhiro Kitajima1, Kazuhito Fukushima1, Shingo Yamamoto2, Takashi Kato3, Soichi Odawara3, Haruyuki Takaki3, Masayuki Fujiwara3, Koichiro Yamakado3, Yukako Nakanishi2, Akihiro Kanematsu2, Michio Nojima2, Shozo Hirota3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare 11C-choline PET/CT and bone scintigraphy (BS) for detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Twenty-one patients with histologically proven prostate cancer underwent 11C-choline PET/CT and BS before (n = 4) or after (n = 17) treatment. Patient-, region-, and lesion-based diagnostic performances of bone metastasis of both 11C-choline PET/CT and BS were evaluated using a five-point scale by two experienced readers. Bone metastases were present in 11 (52.4%) of 21 patients and 48 (32.7%) of 147 regions; 111 lesions were found to have bone metastases. Region-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUC) of 11C-choline PET/CT were 97.9%, 99.0%, 98.6%, and 0.9989, respectively; those of BS were 72.9%, 99.0%, 90.5%, and 0.8386, respectively. Sensitivity, accuracy, and AUC significantly differed between the two methods (McNemar test, p = 0.0015, p = 0.0015, and p < 0.0001, respectively). 11C-choline PET/CT detected 110/111 metastatic lesions (99.1%); BS detected 85 (76.6%) (p < 0.0001). According to the CT morphological type, the visualization rates of 11C-choline-PET/BS were 100%/90.3% for the blastic type, 91.7%/8.3% for the lytic type, 100%/100% for the mixed type, and 100%/53.3% for the invisible type, respectively. Significant differences in blastic, lytic, and invisible types were observed between the two methods (p = 0.013, p = 0.0044, and p = 0.023, respectively). In conclusion, 11C-choline PET/CT had greater sensitivity and accuracy than BS for detection of bone involvement in patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; PET; bone metastasis; bone scintigraphy; choline; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28878443      PMCID: PMC5577024          DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.79.3.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  20 in total

1.  [11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Elena Giulia Spinapolice; Federico Fallanca; Cinzia Crivellaro; Giampiero Giovacchini; Luigi Gianolli; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Update on positron emission tomography for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Robert C Murphy; Mark A Nathan; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Role of 11C-choline PET/CT in the re-staging of prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse and negative results at bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Chiara Fuccio; Paolo Castellucci; Riccardo Schiavina; Pier Luigi Guidalotti; Gilberto Gavaruzzi; Gian Carlo Montini; Cristina Nanni; Maria Cristina Marzola; Domenico Rubello; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Shen; Houfu Deng; Shuang Hu; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Spine metastases in prostate cancer: comparison of technetium-99m-MDP whole-body bone scintigraphy, [(18) F]choline positron emission tomography(PET)/computed tomography (CT) and [(18) F]NaF PET/CT.

Authors:  Mads H Poulsen; Henrik Petersen; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Jørn S Jakobsen; Oke Gerke; Jens Karstoft; Signe I Steffansen; Steen Walter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  [Diagnostic performance of bone scintigraphy and (11)C-Choline PET/CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer].

Authors:  J R Garcia; C Moreno; E Valls; P Cozar; P Bassa; M Soler; F J Alvarez-Moro; M Moragas; E Riera
Journal:  Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.359

8.  Predictive factors of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Elisa Coradeschi; Valentino Bettinardi; Luigi Gianolli; Vincenzo Scattoni; Cesare Cozzarini; Nadia Di Muzio; Patrizio Rigatti; Ferruccio Fazio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  The use of F-18 choline PET in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer: correlation with morphological changes on CT.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Josef Hammer; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Ignac Fogelman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Wolfgang Loidl; Gabriele Broinger; Franz Stoiber; Ignac Foglman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Zhengxing Gou; Renhui Wu; Yuan Yuan; Guiquan Yu; Yigang Zhao
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Diagnostic performance of choline PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Guo; Ling Wang; Junjie Hu; Dehong Feng; Lijuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer: Lesion-based sensitivity of dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT compared to low-dose CT and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Jeanette Ansholm Hansen; Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad; Oke Gerke; Christina Baun; Kirsten Falch; Sandra Duvnjak; Abass Alavi; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of PET/CT and MRI in the Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis of Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Yelong Shen; Canhua Yun; Ruixiao Wang; Ganggang Wang; Jiyang Tan; Tao Wang; Qun Yao; Bomin Wang; Lianxin Li; Jingyi Mi; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.