| Literature DB >> 28878443 |
Kazuhiro Kitajima1, Kazuhito Fukushima1, Shingo Yamamoto2, Takashi Kato3, Soichi Odawara3, Haruyuki Takaki3, Masayuki Fujiwara3, Koichiro Yamakado3, Yukako Nakanishi2, Akihiro Kanematsu2, Michio Nojima2, Shozo Hirota3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare 11C-choline PET/CT and bone scintigraphy (BS) for detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Twenty-one patients with histologically proven prostate cancer underwent 11C-choline PET/CT and BS before (n = 4) or after (n = 17) treatment. Patient-, region-, and lesion-based diagnostic performances of bone metastasis of both 11C-choline PET/CT and BS were evaluated using a five-point scale by two experienced readers. Bone metastases were present in 11 (52.4%) of 21 patients and 48 (32.7%) of 147 regions; 111 lesions were found to have bone metastases. Region-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUC) of 11C-choline PET/CT were 97.9%, 99.0%, 98.6%, and 0.9989, respectively; those of BS were 72.9%, 99.0%, 90.5%, and 0.8386, respectively. Sensitivity, accuracy, and AUC significantly differed between the two methods (McNemar test, p = 0.0015, p = 0.0015, and p < 0.0001, respectively). 11C-choline PET/CT detected 110/111 metastatic lesions (99.1%); BS detected 85 (76.6%) (p < 0.0001). According to the CT morphological type, the visualization rates of 11C-choline-PET/BS were 100%/90.3% for the blastic type, 91.7%/8.3% for the lytic type, 100%/100% for the mixed type, and 100%/53.3% for the invisible type, respectively. Significant differences in blastic, lytic, and invisible types were observed between the two methods (p = 0.013, p = 0.0044, and p = 0.023, respectively). In conclusion, 11C-choline PET/CT had greater sensitivity and accuracy than BS for detection of bone involvement in patients with prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: FDG; PET; bone metastasis; bone scintigraphy; choline; prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28878443 PMCID: PMC5577024 DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.79.3.387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nagoya J Med Sci ISSN: 0027-7622 Impact factor: 1.131