Literature DB >> 28878062

Plant defences limit herbivore population growth by changing predator-prey interactions.

Mônica F Kersch-Becker1,2, André Kessler3, Jennifer S Thaler3,4.   

Abstract

Plant quality and predators are important factors affecting herbivore population growth, but how they interact to regulate herbivore populations is not well understood. We manipulated jasmonate-induced plant resistance, exposure to the natural predator community and herbivore density to test how these factors jointly and independently affect herbivore population growth. On low-resistance plants, the predator community was diverse and abundant, promoting high predator consumption rates. On high-resistance plants, the predator community was less diverse and abundant, resulting in low predator consumption rate. Plant resistance only directly regulated aphid population growth on predator-excluded plants. When predators were present, plant resistance indirectly regulated herbivore population growth by changing the impact of predators on the herbivorous prey. A possible mechanism for the interaction between plant resistance and predation is that methyl salicylate, a herbivore-induced plant volatile attractive to predators, was more strongly induced in low-resistance plants. Increased plant resistance reduced predator attractant lures, preventing predators from locating their prey. Low-resistance plants may regulate herbivore populations via predators by providing reliable information on prey availability and increasing the effectiveness of predators.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphids; herbivory; jasmonic acid; methyl salicylate; plant resistance; volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28878062      PMCID: PMC5597831          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature.

Authors:  A Kessler; I T Baldwin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Myriad Plant Responses to Herbivores.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Plant Growth Regul       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  Manipulating natural enemies by plant variety selection and modification: a realistic strategy?

Authors:  D G Bottrell; P Barbosa; F Gould
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Variation in plant quality and the population dynamics of herbivores: there is nothing average about aphids.

Authors:  Sandra E Helms; Mark D Hunter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions.

Authors:  Paul J Ode
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Identification of volatiles that are used in discrimination between plants infested with prey or nonprey herbivores by a predatory mite.

Authors:  Jetske G de Boer; Maarten A Posthumus; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Methyl salicylate, a soybean aphid-induced plant volatile attractive to the predator Coccinella septempunctata.

Authors:  Junwei Zhu; Kye-Chung Park
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The tomato homolog of CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE1 is required for the maternal control of seed maturation, jasmonate-signaled defense responses, and glandular trichome development.

Authors:  Lei Li; Youfu Zhao; Bonnie C McCaig; Byron A Wingerd; Jihong Wang; Mark E Whalon; Eran Pichersky; Gregg A Howe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  De Novo Biosynthesis of Volatiles Induced by Insect Herbivory in Cotton Plants.

Authors:  P. W. Pare; J. H. Tumlinson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 10.  Tomato, pests, parasitoids, and predators: tritrophic interactions involving the genus Lycopersicon.

Authors:  George G Kennedy
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 19.686

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bugs scaring bugs: enemy-risk effects in biological control systems.

Authors:  Michael Culshaw-Maurer; Andrew Sih; Jay A Rosenheim
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 9.492

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.