| Literature DB >> 28877724 |
Lagu He1, Pengfei Wu2, Li Tan1, Bai Le1, Wenhan Du1, Ting Shen1, Jiali Wu1, Zheyi Xiang1, Min Hu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein M (apoM) is a 26-kD apolipoprotein that is mainly expressed in specific cell types, such as human liver parenchymal cells and kidney proximal renal tubular epithelial cells. ApoM can regulate the formation of pre-β-HDL and the reverse cholesterol transport and thus plays an important role in the metabolism of lipids and lipoproteins, meaning that it can affect the development of lipid metabolism disorders. Significantly elevated serum apoM levels are detected in patients with hyperlipidemia. However, few studies have shown how apoM is expressed in primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS), which is often accompanied with hyperlipidemia, and the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. This study was aimed at examining the apoM levels in patients with PNS and at determining the effects of PNS on serum apoM levels in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Apolipoprotein M,PNS; HDL; Hyperlipidaemia; Lipids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28877724 PMCID: PMC5585964 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0556-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study subjects including apoM
| Healthy controls | HLP | PNS + HLP | PNS-HLP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects, n | 73 | 37 | 62 | 33 |
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, years | 40 ± 14 | 42 ± 8 | 39 ± 13 | 39 ± 14 |
| (male/female) | 40/32 | 23/14 | 36/26 | 20/13 |
| Body–mass index, kg/m2 | 21.4 ± 1.81 | 22.5 ± 2.40 | 22.3 ± 2.0 | 22.2 ± 2.0 |
| Lipid profile: | ||||
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.86 ± 0.38 | 3.46 ± 1.90aa | 2.54 ± 1.57aacc | 1.86 ± 1.18aabb |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.19 ± 0.56 | 5.52 ± 0.90aa | 8.54 ± 2.60aacc | 5.47 ± 2.62aabb |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.59 ± 0.48a | 1.12 ± 0.31aa | 1.40 ± 0.25ac | 1.35 ± 0.45aa |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 2.58 ± 0.49 | 3.68 ± 0.82aa | 6.67 ± 2.50aacc | 3.73 ± 2.28aabb |
| Apolipoprotein A, g/L | 1.45 ± 0.37 | 1.50 ± 0.44 | 1.27 ± 0.20 c | 1.33 ± 0.19 |
| Apolipoprotein B, g/L | 0.79 ± 0.16 | 1.13 ± 0.22aa | 1.85 ± 0.53aa | 1.14 ± 0.54aabb |
| Apolipoprotein M, mg/L | 31.6 ± 18.92 | 61.1 ± 23.21aa | 25.1 ± 16.31aacc | 21.0 ± 17.62aa |
| Lipoprotein(a), mg/L | 184.5 ± 223.1 | 108 ± 116 | 740 ± 446.27aacc | 433 ± 384.7aacc |
| UA (g/L) | 281 ± 68.01 | 343 ± 68.02aa | 346 ± 105.42aa | 363 ± 113.32aa |
| BUN (μmol/L) | 4.78 ± 1.06 | 5.24 ± 1.15a | 7.27 ± 4.48aacc | 7.89 ± 6.64aa |
| CRE (μmol/L) | 59.1 ± 18.02 | 68.7 ± 13.81aa | 73.8 ± 42.51aa | 80.0 ± 61.01aa |
| CysC (mg/ L) | 0.77 ± 0.13 | 0.82 ± 0.12a | 1.19 ± 0.40aacc | 1.33 ± 0.85aa |
| NGAL (ng/mL) | 68.2 ± 27.01 | 85.0 ± 32.02aa | 143.2 ± 76.05aacc | 17.1, ±95.02aa |
| Proteinuria (g/d) | 5.74 ± 4.50 | 4.16 ± 3.50a | ||
Data are mean ± SD. N number, HLP HLP patients,PNS + HLP: PNS with hypoproteinemia, PNS-HLP PNS without hypoproteinemia, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
P value comparisons among four groups by one-way ANOVA
avs. Healthy control group
bvs. PNS with hyperlipidemia group
cvs. Hyperlipidemia group
a P < 0.05, aa P < 0.01
b P < 0.05, bb P < 0.01
c P < 0.05, cc P < 0.01
Fig. 1The flowchart of the study
Fig. 2Serum apolipoprotein M (apoM) concentration is decreased in PNS patients but elevated in the hyperlipidemia group. Serum concentrations of apoM in PNS patients, grouped according to the Global Initiative for PNS, the Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program, and in healthy controls. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to controls. #P < 0.05 a significant difference between the two groups indicated by the horizontal line
Fig. 3Patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS) show elevated serum triglyceride (TG) levels, total cholesterol (THOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Serum concentrations of routine serum lipid levels in PNS patients, grouped according to the Global Initiative for PNS, the Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program, and in healthy controls. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to the control subjects. ##P < 0.01 a significant difference between the two groups indicated by the horizontal line
Fig. 4The graphs above showing the renal function indices. a PNS patients have elevated BUN and CRE levels; (b) The PNS and hyperlipidemia groups shows elevated CysC as compared with the healthy controls; the PNS groups had significantly higher serum CysC levels as compared with the hyperlipidemia group; (c) the PNS and hyperlipidemia groups shows elevated NGAL concentrations as compared with the healthy controls; the PNS groups show significantly higher serum NGAL levels as compared with the hyperlipidemia group. Serum levels of renal function indices in PNS patients grouped according to the Global Initiative for PNS, the Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program, and in healthy controls. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to the control subjects. ##P < 0.01 a significant difference between the two groups indicated by the horizontal line
Correlation between serum lipid profiles and apoM
| Healthy controls | HLP | PNS + HLP | PNS-HLP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gender | 0.196 | 0.206 | 0.085 | 0.045 |
| age | 0.034 | −0.267 | 0.043 | 0.043 |
| TGs (mmol/L) | −0.126 | 0.111 | −0.124 | 0.260 |
| THOL (mmol/L) | 0.022 | 0.393* | −0.194 | 0.201 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.282* | 0.363* | 0.231* | 0.458** |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.165 | −0.01 | −0.197 | 0.423* |
| apoA1 (g/L) | −0.154 | 0.334** | 0.324* | 0.254* |
| apoB (g/L) | −0.07 | 0.079 | −0.182 | 0.427* |
| Lpa (mg/L) | 0.107 | 0.077 | −0.116 | 0.135 |
| UA (g/L) | −0.108 | −0.223 | −0.003 | 0.066 |
| BUN (μmol/L) | −0.072 | 0.168 | −0.007 | 0.058 |
| CRE (μmol/L) | −0.303** | −0.092 | 0.153 | 0.122 |
| CysC (mg/ L) | −0.202 | −0.078 | 0.113 | 0.166 |
| NGAL (ng/mL) | −0.042 | 0.099 | −0.256* | 0.036 |
| Proteinuria (g/d) | −0.269* | −0.414* |
Univariate correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r) for associations of serum apoM with clinical variables and serum parameters
Groups: hyperlipidemia, PNS without hyperlipidemia, PNS with hyperlipidemia, and healthy controls. The data indicate Pearson’s r
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Fig. 5a, b Correlation between serum levels of apoM levels and proteinuria. c, d Correlation between serum levels of proteinuria and routine serum lipids. There was a negative correlation between proteinuria and serum apoM levels: (a) the PNS with hyperlipidemia group (r = −0.269; P < 0.05), (b) the PNS without hyperlipidemia group (r = −0.414; P < 0.05), (c) the PNS with hyperlipidemia group (r = 0.269; P < 0.05), (d) the PNS without hyperlipidemia group (r = −0.354; P < 0.05)