Literature DB >> 28877303

Association of Guideline Adherence for Serial Evaluations With Survival and Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Aisha Ahmed1,2, Paul Sorajja1,2, Ross F Garberich1,2, R Saeid Farivar1,2, Kevin M Harris1,2, Mario Gössl1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: For patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular function, current practice guidelines empirically recommend serial evaluations every 6 to 12 months. The benefit of this clinical monitoring is unknown. Objective: To determine the association of guideline adherence with clinical outcomes in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study involved 300 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis who were seen in the ambulatory Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital. Rates of survival and adverse clinical events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization, were compared between patients who adhered to serial evaluation guidance and those who did not. Medical records were reviewed from July 25, 2007, to December 6, 2012. Data analysis took place from February 4, 2017, to July 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and major adverse clinical events during follow-up.
Results: The study population of 300 comprised 143 men (47.7%) and had a mean (SD) age of 78.6 (11.5) years. There were no differences in age, race/ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, insurance status, left ventricular function, and aortic stenosis severity between patients with (n = 202) and patients without (n = 98) guideline adherence. Aortic valve replacement (surgical or catheter based) was performed more frequently (54.0% vs 19.4%; P < .001) and the median (interquartile range) time for this performance was earlier (2.2 [1.2-3.6] years vs 3.5 [2.0-5.8] years; P < .001) in patients with guideline adherence. All-cause mortality was higher for nonadherent patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.07-2.30; P < .001), and these patients also had a higher rate of hospital admission for heart failure decompensation in follow-up (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.27-2.18; P < .001). Four-year survival that is free from death and heart failure hospitalization was higher for adherent patients than for nonadherent patients (38.7% vs 23.3%; P < .001), and this difference remained significant in models adjusted for baseline variables (adjusted HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.04-2.29; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study support the need for close monitoring of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and help to validate current guidelines for serial evaluations. These findings also support initiatives to improve guideline adherence in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28877303      PMCID: PMC5815010          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  11 in total

1.  Reasons for nonadherence to guidelines for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and potential solutions.

Authors:  Benjamin H Freed; Lissa Sugeng; Kathleen Furlong; Victor Mor-Avi; Jaishankar Raman; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk.

Authors:  David S Bach; Derrick Siao; Steven E Girard; Claire Duvernoy; Benjamin D McCallister; Sarah K Gualano
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-27

3.  Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  T A Kelly; R M Rothbart; C M Cooper; D L Kaiser; M L Smucker; R S Gibson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis.

Authors:  P A Pellikka; R A Nishimura; K R Bailey; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Maurice E Sarano; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph F Malouf; Kent R Bailey; Christopher G Scott; Marion E Barnes; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Raphael Rosenhek; Robert Zilberszac; Michael Schemper; Martin Czerny; Gerald Mundigler; Senta Graf; Jutta Bergler-Klein; Michael Grimm; Harald Gabriel; Gerald Maurer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Comparison of 1-Year Outcome in Patients With Severe Aorta Stenosis Treated Conservatively or by Aortic Valve Replacement or by Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Data from a Multicenter Spanish Registry).

Authors:  Hugo González-Saldivar; Carlos Rodriguez-Pascual; Gonzalo de la Morena; Covadonga Fernández-Golfín; Carmen Amorós; Mario Baquero Alonso; Luis Martínez Dolz; Albert Ariza Solé; Gabriela Guzmán-Martínez; Juan José Gómez-Doblas; Antonio Arribas Jiménez; María Eugenia Fuentes; Laura Galian Gay; Martin Ruiz Ortiz; Pablo Avanzas; Emad Abu-Assi; Tomás Ripoll-Vera; Oscar Díaz-Castro; Eduardo P Osinalde; Manuel Martínez-Sellés
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Practice gaps in the care of mitral valve regurgitation: Insights from the American College of Cardiology mitral regurgitation gap analysis and advisory panel.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Paul Grayburn; Jill A Foster; Marti L McCulloch; Vinay Badhwar; James S Gammie; Salvatore P Costa; Robert Michael Benitez; Michael J Rinaldi; Vinod H Thourani; Randolph P Martin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  R Rosenhek; T Binder; G Porenta; I Lang; G Christ; M Schemper; G Maurer; H Baumgartner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lars Søndergaard; Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Henrik Nissen; Bo Juel Kjeldsen; Petur Petursson; Anh Thuc Ngo; Niels Thue Olsen; Yanping Chang; Olaf Walter Franzen; Thomas Engstrøm; Peter Clemmensen; Peter Skov Olsen; Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Managing Provider Type on Severe Aortic Stenosis Management and Mortality.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Ratnasari Padang; Christopher G Scott; Shannon M E Murphy; Rosalind Fabunmi; Jeremy J Thaden
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.106

2.  Facilitated Data Relay and Effects on Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Europe.

Authors:  Richard P Steeds; Matthias Lutz; Jeetendra Thambyrajah; Antonio Serra; Eberhard Schulz; Jiri Maly; Marco Aiello; Tanja K Rudolph; Guy Lloyd; Alessandro Santo Bortone; Karl Eugen Hauptmann; Alberto Clerici; Georg Delle-Karth; Johannes Rieber; Ciro Indolfi; Massimo Mancone; Loic Belle; Alexander Lauten; Martin Arnold; Berto J Bouma; Cornelia Deutsch; Jana Kurucova; Martin Thoenes; Peter Bramlage; Norbert Frey; David Messika-Zeitoun
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.