Literature DB >> 28877004

Reciprocity Outperforms Conformity to Promote Cooperation.

Angelo Romano1,2, Daniel Balliet2.   

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists have proposed two processes that could give rise to the pervasiveness of human cooperation observed among individuals who are not genetically related: reciprocity and conformity. We tested whether reciprocity outperformed conformity in promoting cooperation, especially when these psychological processes would promote a different cooperative or noncooperative response. To do so, across three studies, we observed participants' cooperation with a partner after learning (a) that their partner had behaved cooperatively (or not) on several previous trials and (b) that their group members had behaved cooperatively (or not) on several previous trials with that same partner. Although we found that people both reciprocate and conform, reciprocity has a stronger influence on cooperation. Moreover, we found that conformity can be partly explained by a concern about one's reputation-a finding that supports a reciprocity framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conformity; cooperation; culture; evolution; open data; open materials; reciprocity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28877004     DOI: 10.1177/0956797617714828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  4 in total

1.  Questions of value, questions of magnitude: An exploration and application of methods for comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Jacob J Coutts; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-17

2.  Shame in decision making under risk conditions: Understanding the effect of transparency.

Authors:  Tomas Bonavia; Josué Brox-Ponce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Peer pressure: Conformity outweighs reciprocity in social anxiety.

Authors:  Andreea Bică
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-03-25

4.  Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe.

Authors:  Niels J Van Doesum; Ryan O Murphy; Marcello Gallucci; Efrat Aharonov-Majar; Ursula Athenstaedt; Wing Tung Au; Liying Bai; Robert Böhm; Inna Bovina; Nancy R Buchan; Xiao-Ping Chen; Kitty B Dumont; Jan B Engelmann; Kimmo Eriksson; Hyun Euh; Susann Fiedler; Justin Friesen; Simon Gächter; Camilo Garcia; Roberto González; Sylvie Graf; Katarzyna Growiec; Serge Guimond; Martina Hřebíčková; Elizabeth Immer-Bernold; Jeff Joireman; Gokhan Karagonlar; Kerry Kawakami; Toko Kiyonari; Yu Kou; D Michael Kuhlman; Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis; Siugmin Lay; Geoffrey J Leonardelli; Norman P Li; Yang Li; Boris Maciejovsky; Zoi Manesi; Ali Mashuri; Aurelia Mok; Karin S Moser; Ladislav Moták; Adrian Netedu; Chandrasekhar Pammi; Michael J Platow; Karolina Raczka-Winkler; Christopher P Reinders Folmer; Cecilia Reyna; Angelo Romano; Shaul Shalvi; Cláudia Simão; Adam W Stivers; Pontus Strimling; Yannis Tsirbas; Sonja Utz; Leander van der Meij; Sven Waldzus; Yiwen Wang; Bernd Weber; Ori Weisel; Tim Wildschut; Fabian Winter; Junhui Wu; Jose C Yong; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.