Literature DB >> 28876132

Removal of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis after Hand Washing with Antimicrobial and Nonantimicrobial Soap and Persistence of These Bacteria in Rinsates.

J Pérez-Garza1, S García1, N Heredia1.   

Abstract

Food handlers are important sources of contamination in the agricultural environment. This study was conducted (i) to evaluate the activity of antimicrobial soaps against Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis using a hand washing model with soiled hands and (ii) to determine the survival and persistence of these bacteria in rinsates. Sterilized agricultural soil from tomato and pepper farms was inoculated with E. coli or E. faecalis at 103 or 106 CFU/g. Decontaminated hands were placed in contact with contaminated soil for 2 min and were then washed with soaps with or without antimicrobial compounds (citric extracts, chloroxylenol, triclosan, or chlorhexidine gluconate). As the control, hands were washed with sterile distilled water. The levels of bacteria remaining on the hands and recovered from the rinsates were determined using a membrane filtration method and selective media. Antimicrobial soaps removed levels of E. coli similar to those removed by distilled water and nonantimicrobial soap on hands contaminated with E. coli at 103 CFU/g. However, when hands were contaminated with E. coli at 106 CFU/g, more E. coli was removed with the chlorhexidine gluconate soap. When hands were contaminated with E. faecalis at 103 CFU/g, bacteria were removed more effectively with soaps containing chloroxylenol or chlorhexidine gluconate. When hands were contaminated with E. faecalis at 106 CFU/g, all of the antimicrobial soaps were more effective for removing the bacteria than were distilled water and nonantimicrobial soap. E. coli grew in all of the hand washing rinsates except that containing triclosan, whereas E. faecalis from the 106 CFU/g treatments grew in rinsates containing chlorhexidine gluconate and in the distilled water rinsates. Washing with antimicrobial soap was more effective for reducing bacteria on soiled hands than was washing with water or nonantimicrobial soap. However, persistence or growth of bacteria in these rinsates poses health risks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial agent; Decontamination; Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli; Soap formulations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28876132     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of Bacterial Communities by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in a Melon-Producing Agro-environment.

Authors:  Eduardo Franco-Frías; Victor Mercado-Guajardo; Angel Merino-Mascorro; Janeth Pérez-Garza; Norma Heredia; Juan S León; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Jorge Dávila-Aviña; Santos García
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Coronavirus Infection Prevention by Wearing Masks.

Authors:  Thi Sinh Vo; Tran Thi Thu Ngoc Vo; Tran Thi Bich Chau Vo
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2020-06

3.  Effectiveness of preoperative bath using chloroxylenol antiseptic soap on the incidence of post emergency cesarean section surgical site infection at Mbarara Regional Referral hospital, Uganda: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Henry Lukabwe; Rodgers Kajabwangu; Dale Mugisha; Horace Mayengo; Baraka Munyanderu; Asanairi Baluku; Anthony Manyang; Jolly Joe Lapat; Francis Banya; Musa Kayondo; Ronald Mayanja; Joy Muhumuza; Francis Bajunirwe; Joseph Ngonzi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Development and In Vitro Validation of Antibacterial Paints Containing Chloroxylenol and Terpineol.

Authors:  Micaela Machado Querido; Ivo Paulo; Sriram Hariharakrishnan; Daniel Rocha; Nuno Barbosa; Diogo Gonçalves; Rui Galhano Dos Santos; João Moura Bordado; João Paulo Teixeira; Cristiana Costa Pereira
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 5.  Microorganisms populating the water-related indoor biome.

Authors:  Monika Novak Babič; Cene Gostinčar; Nina Gunde-Cimerman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.813

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.