Literature DB >> 2887588

The value of self-report assessment in studies of anxiety disorders.

R M Glass, E H Uhlenhuth, R Kellner.   

Abstract

This review compares the sensitivities of a physician-rated scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), and a patient-rated scale, the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL), in detecting the anti-anxiety effects of benzodiazepines in a large sample of placebo-controlled trials. Scales and subscales were compared within the same study, a methodologic feature unique to this review. The total score, psychic factor, and somatic factor of the HAS were equally sensitive to the effects of benzodiazepines. The total score, anxiety factor, and somatization factor of the HSCL also were equally sensitive. The HAS total score, however, was consistently more sensitive than any of the HSCL scores. There was no evidence that physicians used side effects to make their ratings more sensitive. Sedative side effects, however, adversely affected the sensitivity of patient ratings. The data suggest that patient ratings reflect a cost-benefit computation taking account of both antianxiety and sedative effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2887588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  1 in total

1.  Self- and observer assessment in anxiolytic drug trials: a comparison of their validity.

Authors:  W Maier; M Albus; R Buller; D Nutzinger; D Shera; P Bech
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.270

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.