BACKGROUND: Phosphoinositide-3 (PI-3) kinase signaling has a pervasive role in cancer. One of the key effectors of PI-3 kinase signaling is AKT, a kinase that promotes growth and survival in a variety of cancers. Genetically engineered mouse models of prostate cancer have shown that AKT signaling is sufficient to induce prostatic epithelial neoplasia (PIN), but insufficient for progression to adenocarcinoma. This contrasts with the phenotype of mice with prostate-specific deletion of Pten, where excessive PI-3 kinase signaling induces both PIN and locally invasive carcinoma. We reasoned that additional PI-3 kinase effector kinases promote prostate cancer progression via activities that provide biological complementarity to AKT. We focused on the PKN kinase family members, which undergo activation in response to PI-3 kinase signaling, show expression changes in prostate cancer, and contribute to cell motility pathways in cancer cells. METHODS: PKN kinase activity was measured by incorporation of 32 P into protein substrates. Phosphorylation of the turn-motif (TM) in PKN proteins by mTOR was analyzed using the TORC2-specific inhibitor torin and a PKN1 phospho-TM-specific antibody. Amino acid substitutions in the TM of PKN were engineered and assayed for effects on kinase activity. Cell motility-related functions and PKN localization was analyzed by depletion approaches and immunofluorescence microscopy, respectively. The contribution of PKN proteins to prostate tumorigenesis was characterized in several mouse models that express PKN transgenes. The requirement for PKN activity in prostate cancer initiated by loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (Pten), and the potential redundancy between PKN isoforms, was analyzed by prostate-specific deletion of Pkn1, Pkn2, and Pten. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: PKN1 and PKN2 contribute to motility pathways in human prostate cancer cells. PKN1 and PKN2 kinase activity is regulated by TORC2-dependent phosphorylation of the TM, which together with published data indicates that PKN proteins receive multiple PI-3 kinase-dependent inputs. Transgenic expression of active AKT and PKN1 is not sufficient for progression beyond PIN. Moreover, Pkn1 is not required for tumorigenesis initiated by loss of Pten. Triple knockout of Pten, Pkn1, and Pkn2 in mouse prostate results in squamous cell carcinoma, an uncommon but therapy-resistant form of prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND: Phosphoinositide-3 (PI-3) kinase signaling has a pervasive role in cancer. One of the key effectors of PI-3 kinase signaling is AKT, a kinase that promotes growth and survival in a variety of cancers. Genetically engineered mouse models of prostate cancer have shown that AKT signaling is sufficient to induce prostatic epithelial neoplasia (PIN), but insufficient for progression to adenocarcinoma. This contrasts with the phenotype of mice with prostate-specific deletion of Pten, where excessive PI-3 kinase signaling induces both PIN and locally invasive carcinoma. We reasoned that additional PI-3 kinase effector kinases promote prostate cancer progression via activities that provide biological complementarity to AKT. We focused on the PKN kinase family members, which undergo activation in response to PI-3 kinase signaling, show expression changes in prostate cancer, and contribute to cell motility pathways in cancer cells. METHODS:PKN kinase activity was measured by incorporation of 32 P into protein substrates. Phosphorylation of the turn-motif (TM) in PKN proteins by mTOR was analyzed using the TORC2-specific inhibitor torin and a PKN1 phospho-TM-specific antibody. Amino acid substitutions in the TM of PKN were engineered and assayed for effects on kinase activity. Cell motility-related functions and PKN localization was analyzed by depletion approaches and immunofluorescence microscopy, respectively. The contribution of PKN proteins to prostate tumorigenesis was characterized in several mouse models that express PKN transgenes. The requirement for PKN activity in prostate cancer initiated by loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (Pten), and the potential redundancy between PKN isoforms, was analyzed by prostate-specific deletion of Pkn1, Pkn2, and Pten. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS:PKN1 and PKN2 contribute to motility pathways in humanprostate cancer cells. PKN1 and PKN2 kinase activity is regulated by TORC2-dependent phosphorylation of the TM, which together with published data indicates that PKN proteins receive multiple PI-3 kinase-dependent inputs. Transgenic expression of active AKT and PKN1 is not sufficient for progression beyond PIN. Moreover, Pkn1 is not required for tumorigenesis initiated by loss of Pten. Triple knockout of Pten, Pkn1, and Pkn2 in mouse prostate results in squamous cell carcinoma, an uncommon but therapy-resistant form of prostate cancer.
Authors: Pradip K Majumder; Jen Jen Yeh; Daniel J George; Phillip G Febbo; Jennifer Kum; Qi Xue; Rachel Bikoff; Hongfeng Ma; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; Massimo Loda; William R Sellers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-06-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shunyou Wang; Jing Gao; Qunying Lei; Nora Rozengurt; Colin Pritchard; Jing Jiao; George V Thomas; Gang Li; Pradip Roy-Burman; Peter S Nelson; Xin Liu; Hong Wu Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Lloyd C Trotman; Masaru Niki; Zohar A Dotan; Jason A Koutcher; Antonio Di Cristofano; Andrew Xiao; Alan S Khoo; Pradip Roy-Burman; Norman M Greenberg; Terry Van Dyke; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2003-10-27 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Ivan Quétier; Jacqueline J T Marshall; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Sylvie Lachmann; Adele Casamassima; Claudio Franco; Sarah Escuin; Joseph T Worrall; Priththivika Baskaran; Vinothini Rajeeve; Michael Howell; Andrew J Copp; Gordon Stamp; Ian Rosewell; Pedro Cutillas; Holger Gerhardt; Peter J Parker; Angus J M Cameron Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Elizabeth R Murray; Shinelle Menezes; Jack C Henry; Josie L Williams; Lorena Alba-Castellón; Priththivika Baskaran; Ivan Quétier; Ami Desai; Jacqueline J T Marshall; Ian Rosewell; Marianthi Tatari; Vinothini Rajeeve; Faraz Khan; Jun Wang; Panoraia Kotantaki; Eleanor J Tyler; Namrata Singh; Claire S Reader; Edward P Carter; Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke; Richard P Grose; Hemant M Kocher; Nuria Gavara; Oliver Pearce; Pedro Cutillas; John F Marshall; Angus J M Cameron Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Igor Govorov; Sanaz Attarha; Larysa Kovalevska; Emil Andersson; Elena Kashuba; Miriam Mints Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Timothy R Baffi; Gema Lordén; Jacob M Wozniak; Andreas Feichtner; Wayland Yeung; Alexandr P Kornev; Charles C King; Jason C Del Rio; Ameya J Limaye; Julius Bogomolovas; Christine M Gould; Ju Chen; Eileen J Kennedy; Natarajan Kannan; David J Gonzalez; Eduard Stefan; Susan S Taylor; Alexandra C Newton Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Yi Hao; Glen A Bjerke; Karolina Pietrzak; Tiffany A Melhuish; Yu Han; Stephen D Turner; Henry F Frierson; David Wotton Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 5.917