Literature DB >> 28875251

The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion.

Verónica Córdoba1, Mónica Fernández2, Estela Santalla2.   

Abstract

Methane production from swine wastewater was evaluated by using sewage sludge as inoculum in three substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) named A (1:1), B (3:1) and C (6:1), with the objective to identify the proportion that optimizes the performance of the process. Duplicated batch bioreactors of 1 L capacity under mesophilic conditions were used to carry out the experiment. The highest biogas yield was observed in A treatment (554 ± 75 mL/g volatile solid (VS)). Cumulative methane production decreased from 382 ± 22 to 232 ± 5 mL/g VS when SIR increased from 1:1 to 6:1. The first-order model and the modified Gompertz equation were used to model the experimental cumulative methane yield giving adjustments with coefficients of determination of 96 and 99% respectively. The effect of the SIR was analysed based on the kinetic parameters of the Gompertz equation, which are methane production potential, maximum methane production rate and lag-phase time. The best performance in terms of the kinetic parameters was obtained for treatment A; however, treatment B could still ensure a stable process. The use of higher inoculum concentration generated 463.1% higher methane production rate and required 77.3% shorter adaptation time (lag phase) in the SIR range studied. When higher SIR was used (e.g. 14:1, previous work), it could be observed that the Gompertz equation also adjusted adequately the experimental data (R 2 > 0.99) although the lag-phase time did not remain in a linear relationship with SIR but exponentially above SIR = 6:1. These results demonstrated that when a low amount of inoculum was used, the adaptation time of microorganisms resulted much higher than expected delaying the methane production and extending the time needed to achieve adequate performance of the process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inoculum; Methane production; Modelling; Swine wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28875251     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  17 in total

Review 1.  Predictive modelling of the microbial lag phase: a review.

Authors:  I A M Swinnen; K Bernaerts; E J J Dens; A H Geeraerd; J F Van Impe
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Kinetic modeling of batch hydrogen production process by mixed anaerobic cultures.

Authors:  Yang Mu; Gang Wang; Han-Qing Yu
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates: focusing on ammonia inhibition.

Authors:  I Angelidaki; L Ellegaard; B K Ahring
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1993-06-20       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Optimisation of a microwave pretreatment of wheat straw for methane production.

Authors:  D Jackowiak; D Bassard; A Pauss; T Ribeiro
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Control strategy for maximum anaerobic co-digestion performance.

Authors:  Santiago García-Gen; Jorge Rodríguez; Juan M Lema
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Reactor performances and microbial communities of biogas reactors: effects of inoculum sources.

Authors:  Sheng Han; Yafeng Liu; Shicheng Zhang; Gang Luo
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Energy-efficient methane production from macroalgal biomass through chemo disperser liquefaction.

Authors:  K Tamilarasan; S Kavitha; J Rajesh Banu; P Arulazhagan; Ick Tae Yeom
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 8.  The biology of methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  J G Zeikus
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-06

9.  Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste.

Authors:  Trine L Hansen; Jens Ejbye Schmidt; Irini Angelidaki; Emilia Marca; Jes la Cour Jansen; Hans Mosbaek; Thomas H Christensen
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 7.145

10.  Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models.

Authors:  Gopi Krishna Kafle; Lide Chen
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 7.145

View more
  3 in total

1.  Techno-economic and environmental assessment of biogas production from banana peel (Musa paradisiaca) in a biorefinery concept.

Authors:  Jimmy Anderson Martínez-Ruano; Ashley Sthefanía Caballero-Galván; Daissy Lorena Restrepo-Serna; Carlos Ariel Cardona
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of microwave, H2O2/MW and H2O2/heat pre-treatments on the methane production from wastewater sludges: experimental and modeling approach.

Authors:  Ece Özön; Ayşen Erdinçler
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Synergistic effect from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and Sophora flavescens residues at different co-substrate ratios.

Authors:  Xinxin Ma; Miao Yu; Min Yang; Ming Gao; Chuanfu Wu; Qunhui Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.