Literature DB >> 28875018

Everyone needs good neighbours - the intricate relationship between the acetylcholine-receptor channel and its membrane environment.

Stephen P Muench1,2.   

Abstract

A short commentary is given on the article in this issue by Nigel Unwin [IUCrJ (2017), 4, 393-399] on 'Segregation of lipids near acetylcholine-receptor channels imaged by cryo-EM'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetylcholine receptor; cholesterol; cryo-EM; helical image reconstruction; lipid microdomain; membrane proteins

Year:  2017        PMID: 28875018      PMCID: PMC5571794          DOI: 10.1107/S2052252517009058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IUCrJ        ISSN: 2052-2525            Impact factor:   4.769


The field of electron microscopy (EM) has undergone significant advancement in its capabilities in terms of both the resolution obtainable and the diverse range of systems that can be studied (Subramaniam et al., 2016 ▸). A particular strength of EM has been in determining the structure of membrane proteins, which have proven to be highly challenging owing to the difficulties in overexpressing them and their instability outside of the membrane environment (Rawson et al., 2016 ▸). This is a significant hurdle in structure-based drug design and target validation with ∼60% of drugs targeting membrane proteins, for example G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), ion channels and ABC transporters (Overington et al., 2006 ▸). One of the best characterized membrane proteins is the acetyl choline (ACh) receptor, a ligand-gated ion channel which consists of a pentamer of protein subunits (β, δ, αδ, γ, αγ) (Fig. 1 ▸). Through a series of landmark time-resolved EM experiments the mechanism of traversing the channel has been elucidated, whereby binding of acetyl­choline to αγ causes a displacement of β, which in turn results in an opening of the pore to allow for the passage of Na+ ions (Unwin & Fujiyoshi, 2012 ▸; Miyazawa et al., 2003 ▸). This movement of charge is sufficient to initiate an action potential through depolarizing the postsynaptic membrane. However, what is more poorly understood is the role that the surrounding lipidic environment plays in the action of the ACh receptor. This has important implications as the lipid environment has been shown to be involved in catalytic cycling, transport, regulation and/or stability. For example, the β-barrel membrane protein OmpX, has been shown to have pronounced dynamic variability in different lipid environments and detergents (Frey et al., 2017 ▸), and cardiolipin can promote dimerization of membrane proteins (Gupta et al., 2017 ▸). Therefore, it is becoming more important, when studying membrane proteins, that a near-native environment is maintained where possible. This can be partially achieved through approaches such as nanodiscs, which maintain a bilayer environment, or styrene maleic acid copolymers (SMALPs), which extract membrane proteins with their native lipids, but extraction in the native membrane itself is the gold standard (Gao et al., 2016 ▸ & Lee et al., 2016 ▸).
Figure 1

The ACh receptor housed within the membrane environment. The five different subunits are shown with an orange, yellow, green, blue and red surface (note the blue subunit is largely occluded by the other four subunits). The structure was generated from the PDB file (PDB reference: 4aq5) (Unwin & Fujiyoshi, 2012 ▸).

To this end, the study by Nigel Unwin (Unwin, 2017 ▸) in this issue of has advanced our understanding of the ACh receptor by imaging and reconstructing it in the unperturbed natural membrane. Through advances in the EM field, including more sensitive detectors and stable microscopes, the ACh receptor is examined in a more native environment taking account of the local lipid environment. Two-dimensional classification was used to sort the data, with the best class resulting in a final resolution of 8.4 Å. By using a single-particle helical method as opposed to a Fourier–Bessel helical method, the membrane region is better defined. This shows that in several locations, immediately adjacent to the protein surface, there is a weakening or loss of density. These low-density patches form a microdomain (∼26 Å × 11 Å) enclosed by helices M1 and M4 and polar phospho­lipid headgroups. Smaller patches are also present next to the β, αγ, γ, αδ subunits and the M1 and M4 helices. This loss of density can be attributed to the presence of cholesterol which has a much smaller headgroup than other lipids and is present in larger amounts in the native membrane (∼35 mol%), compared with smaller phospho­lipids such as phosphatidic acid. The presence of cholesterol around the ACh receptor is not a new observation, indeed it had been previously reported (Barrantes, 2010 ▸). However, what sets this study apart is the ability to structurally characterize the location of these rafts around the ACh receptor for the first time. But what role does cholesterol play in ACh-receptor function? It has been suggested within this study that for the β subunit to achieve an outward tilt, opening up the channel, the δ subunit must resist the force. The cholesterol-rich microdomain would reduce the free volume available for molecular motion and thus impose resistance and rigidity next to the δ subunit. This hypothesis is yet to be proven but opens up the next chapter in understanding ACh-receptor structure and function, with improved EM resolution, time-resolved studies, and the use of biochemical and mass spectrometry lipidomic analysis the role of the native lipidic environment will be better understood, providing new insights into this essential membrane protein.
  11 in total

Review 1.  How many drug targets are there?

Authors:  John P Overington; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Cholesterol effects on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: cellular aspects.

Authors:  Francisco J Barrantes
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2010

3.  Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore.

Authors:  Atsuo Miyazawa; Yoshinori Fujiyoshi; Nigel Unwin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers.

Authors:  Kallol Gupta; Joseph A C Donlan; Jonathan T S Hopper; Povilas Uzdavinys; Michael Landreh; Weston B Struwe; David Drew; Andrew J Baldwin; Phillip J Stansfeld; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The changing landscape of membrane protein structural biology through developments in electron microscopy.

Authors:  Shaun Rawson; Simon Davies; Jonathan D Lippiat; Stephen P Muench
Journal:  Mol Membr Biol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Micelles, Bicelles, and Nanodiscs: Comparing the Impact of Membrane Mimetics on Membrane Protein Backbone Dynamics.

Authors:  Lukas Frey; Nils-Alexander Lakomek; Roland Riek; Stefan Bibow
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  A method for detergent-free isolation of membrane proteins in their local lipid environment.

Authors:  Sarah C Lee; Tim J Knowles; Vincent L G Postis; Mohammed Jamshad; Rosemary A Parslow; Yu-Pin Lin; Adrian Goldman; Pooja Sridhar; Michael Overduin; Stephen P Muench; Timothy R Dafforn
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Gating movement of acetylcholine receptor caught by plunge-freezing.

Authors:  Nigel Unwin; Yoshinori Fujiyoshi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  CryoEM at IUCrJ: a new era.

Authors:  Sriram Subramaniam; Werner Kühlbrandt; Richard Henderson
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.769

10.  TRPV1 structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Erhu Cao; David Julius; Yifan Cheng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.