| Literature DB >> 28874907 |
Chun-Liu Dong1,2, Lin-Xiong Li1,2, Ze-Hua Cui1,2, Shu-Wen Chen1,2, Yan Q Xiong3, Jia-Qi Lu1,2, Xiao-Ping Liao1,2, Yuan Gao1,2, Jian Sun1,2,4, Ya-Hong Liu1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Invasive infections due to Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus are prevalent and life-threatening. Combinations of antibiotic therapy have been employed in many clinical settings for improving therapeutic efficacy, reducing side effects of drugs, and development of antibiotic resistance. Pleuromutilins have a potential to be developed as a new class of antibiotics for systemic use in humans. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between pleuromutilins, including valnemulin, tiamulin, and retapamulin, and 13 other antibiotics representing different mechanisms of action, against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus both in vitro and in an experimental Galleria mellonella model. In vitro synergistic effects were observed in combination of all three study pleuromutilins with tetracycline (TET) by standard checkerboard and/or time-kill assays. In addition, the combination of pleuromutilins with ciprofloxacin or enrofloxacin showed antagonistic effects, while the rest combinations presented indifferent effects. Importantly, all study pleuromutilins in combination with TET significantly enhanced survival rates as compared to the single drug treatment in the G. mellonella model caused by S. aureus strains. Taken together, these results demonstrated synergy effects between pleuromutilins and TET against S. aureus both in vitro and in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Galleria mellonella model; Staphylococcus aureus; antibiotic combination; other antibiotics; pleuromutilins
Year: 2017 PMID: 28874907 PMCID: PMC5572081 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Antibiotics used in this study.
| Antibiotics | Abbreviation | Classification | Primary target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cefotaxime | CTX | Cephalosporins | Cell wall |
| Erythromycin | ERY | Macrolides | Protein synthesis 50S |
| Florfenicol | FFC | Phenicols | Protein synthesis 50S |
| Clindamycin | CLI | Lincosamides | Protein synthesis 50S |
| Ciprofloxacin | CIP | Fluoroquinolones | DNA gyrase |
| Enrofloxacin | ENR | Fluoroquinolones | DNA gyrase |
| Gentamicin | GEN | Aminoglycosides | Protein synthesis 30S |
| Amikacin | AMK | Aminoglycosides | Protein synthesis 30S |
| Tetracycline | TET | Tetracyclines | Protein synthesis 30S |
| Valnemulin | VAL | Pleuromutilins | Protein synthesis 50S |
| Tiamulin | TIA | Pleuromutilins | Protein synthesis 50S |
| Retapamulin | RET | Pleuromutilins | Protein synthesis 50S |
| Vancomycin | VAN | Glycopeptides | Cell wall |
| Bacitracin | BCR | Polypeptides | Cell wall |
| Sulfamethoxazole | SMZ | Sulfonamides | Folic acid |
| Trimethoprim | TMP | Diaminopyrimidines | Folic acid |
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus strains.
| MICs (mg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics | ATCC 29213 | ATCC 43300 | N54 | N9 |
| CTX | 4 | 16 | 4 | 16 |
| ERY | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| FFC | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| CLI | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 1 |
| CIP | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| ENR | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| GEN | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| AMK | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| TET | 0.5 | 0.5 | 64 | 64 |
| VAL | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 |
| TIA | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| RET | 0.0625 | 0.03125 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 |
| VAN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| BCR | 64 | 64 | 32 | 64 |
| SMZ | 128 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
| TMP | 4 | >256 | >256 | >256 |
The fractional inhibitory concentrations index (FICI) of the combinations of antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus.
| Antibiotics | FICI | Interaction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| combination | ATCC 29213 | ATCC 43300 | N54 | N9 | |
| VAL+CTX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+ERY | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+FFC | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+CLI | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+CIP | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | Antagonistic |
| VAL+ENR | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | Antagonistic |
| VAL+GEN | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+AMK | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+TET | 0.375 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Synergistic |
| VAL+VAN | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+BCR | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+SMZ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| VAL+TMP | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indifferent |
| TIA+TET | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | Synergistic or additivity |
| RET+TET | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Synergistic |
| TIA+CIP | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Antagonistic |
| TIA+ENR | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Antagonistic |
| RET+CIP | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Antagonistic |
| RET+ENR | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Antagonistic |
The log change (log10 CFU/mL) between the combinations vs. initial inoculum and the most active single agent after 24 h of incubation.
| Colony changes (log10 CFU/mL) at 24 h | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATCC 29213 | ATCC 43300 | N54 | N9 | ||
| VAL+TET | vs. initital inoculum | –3.37 | –6.19 | –5.71 | –4.15 |
| vs. most active drug | –2.35 | –4.26 | –3.78 | –3.13 | |
| TIA+TET | vs. initital inoculum | –5.24 | –6.30 | –3.21 | –3.65 |
| vs. most active drug | –4.04 | –5.03 | –2.91 | –3.41 | |
| RET+ TET | vs. initital inoculum | –4.44 | –5.87 | –3.71 | –4.72 |
| vs. most active drug | –2.84 | –3.94 | –2.85 | –4.35 | |