Literature DB >> 28874623

Factors affecting the conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis undergoing ERCP due to choledocholithiasis.

Hamza Cinar, Gökhan S Ozbalci, Ismail A Tarim, Kagan Karabulut, Tugrul Kesicioglu, Ayfer K Polat, Kenan Erzurumlu, Murat Derebey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of conversion to open surgery is high in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreotocography (ERCP). The present study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the conversion to open cholecystectomy and minimize the rate of conversion to open surgery.
METHODS: A total of 157 patients admitted to the Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty Hospital due to cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis between January 2002 and December 2012, and they receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. The patients were analyzed retrospectively. The predictive factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy were evaluated. Patients were compared to each other in terms of time passing from ERCP to operation, number of ERCPs, stent usage, stone extraction and complications that occurred while waiting for the operation. Patients were separated into three groups according to the time passing from ERCP to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as follows; group I (short time intervals: 7 days or less): 53 patients, group II (intermediate time intervals: 8-42 days): 70 patients and group III (long time intervals: 43 days and more): 34 patients.
RESULTS: Of the 157 patients, 57 were male and 100 were female. The mean age was 54.5 (range: 19-87) years. Of these 157 patients who received laparoscopic cholecystectomy following ERCP, 22 (14%) underwent open surgery. The conversion to open cholecystectomy was distributed in groups, as follows: seven (13.2%) patients in group I, eight (11.4%) patients in group II and seven (20.6%) patients in group III. When the rate of conversion to open surgery was compared between groups, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.406). The laparoscopic operations were converted to open surgery in 15 (11.3%) of the 133 patients who underwent single ERCP, and in seven (29.2%) of the 24 patients who underwent two or more ERCPs before surgery (p=0.048). The number of ERCPs was determined to be the most important factor that affects the conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomies following ERCP. The removal of stones from the common bile duct, stent placement in the common bile duct, and existence of biliary complications during waiting time from ERCP to LC had no effect on the conversion to open surgery (p=0.454, p=0.058, and p=0.465, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that the timing of LC following ERCP, removal of stones from the common bile duct, stent placement in the common bile duct and the existence of biliary complications during the waiting period have no effect on the rate of conversion to open surgery. The number of ERCPs is the only factor that affects the conversion to open surgery in LC following ERCP. KEY WORDS: Choledocholitiasis, Conversion, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28874623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ital Chir        ISSN: 0003-469X            Impact factor:   0.766


  3 in total

1.  Management of complicated gallstones in the elderly: comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Yousef Nassar; Seth Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Predicting the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography- Subgroup analysis does not improve the prediction.

Authors:  Nitya Krishnamohan; Christina Lo; Ravindra S Date
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

3.  Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis Complicates Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Report From Sri Lanka.

Authors:  R G Malith Sachintha Nandasena; Ma Chamila Lakmal; A A Pathirana; B D Gamage; T K Wijerathne; D D Weerasekera; Akshay Anand
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.