Literature DB >> 28874548

Subnational mobility and consumption-based environmental accounting of US corn in animal protein and ethanol supply chains.

Timothy M Smith1,2, Andrew L Goodkind3, Taegon Kim2, Rylie E O Pelton2, Kyo Suh4,5, Jennifer Schmitt6.   

Abstract

Corn production, and its associated inputs, is a relatively large source of greenhouse gas emissions and uses significant amounts of water and land, thus contributing to climate change, fossil fuel depletion, local air pollutants, and local water scarcity. As large consumers of this corn, corporations in the ethanol and animal protein industries are increasingly assessing and reporting sustainability impacts across their supply chains to identify, prioritize, and communicate sustainability risks and opportunities material to their operations. In doing so, many have discovered that the direct impacts of their owned operations are dwarfed by those upstream in the supply chain, requiring transparency and knowledge about environmental impacts along the supply chains. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) have been used to identify hotspots of environmental impacts at national levels, yet these provide little subnational information necessary for guiding firms' specific supply networks. In this paper, our Food System Supply-Chain Sustainability (FoodS3) model connects spatial, firm-specific demand of corn purchasers with upstream corn production in the United States through a cost minimization transport model. This provides a means to link county-level corn production in the United States to firm-specific demand locations associated with downstream processing facilities. Our model substantially improves current LCA assessment efforts that are confined to broad national or state level impacts. In drilling down to subnational levels of environmental impacts that occur over heterogeneous areas and aggregating these landscape impacts by specific supply networks, targeted opportunities for improvements to the sustainability performance of supply chains are identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commodity flow modeling; environmental accounting; food systems sustainability; life cycle assessment; supply chains

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28874548      PMCID: PMC5617264          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703793114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  International trade in meat: the tip of the pork chop.

Authors:  James N Galloway; Marshall Burke; G Eric Bradford; Rosamond Naylor; Walter Falcon; Ashok K Chapagain; Joanne C Gaskell; Ellen McCullough; Harold A Mooney; Kirsten L L Oleson; Henning Steinfeld; Tom Wassenaar; Vaclav Smil
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 2.  Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems.

Authors:  Robert J Diaz; Rutger Rosenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems.

Authors:  Mario Herrero; Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; An Notenbaert; Mariana C Rufino; Philip K Thornton; Michael Blümmel; Franz Weiss; Delia Grace; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin C Heller; Gregory A Keoleian; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Optimizing Eco-Efficiency Across the Procurement Portfolio.

Authors:  Rylie E O Pelton; Mo Li; Timothy M Smith; Thomas P Lyon
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting.

Authors:  Y Anny Huang; Christopher L Weber; H Scott Matthews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Stefanie Hellweg; Llorenç Milà i Canals
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900-2050 period.

Authors:  Lex Bouwman; Kees Klein Goldewijk; Klaas W Van Der Hoek; Arthur H W Beusen; Detlef P Van Vuuren; Jaap Willems; Mariana C Rufino; Elke Stehfest
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Associations between the distance traveled from sale barns to commercial feedlots in the United States and overall performance, risk of respiratory disease, and cumulative mortality in feeder cattle during 1997 to 2009.

Authors:  N Cernicchiaro; B J White; D G Renter; A H Babcock; L Kelly; R Slattery
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States.

Authors:  Gidon Eshel; Alon Shepon; Tamar Makov; Ron Milo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Scaling properties of food flow networks.

Authors:  Megan Konar; Xiaowen Lin; Benjamin Ruddell; Murugesu Sivapalan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The utilization of seawater for the hydrolysis of macroalgae and subsequent bioethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Darren Greetham; Jessica M Adams; Chenyu Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.