Literature DB >> 28874259

Outcomes from a university-based low-cost in vitro fertilization program providing access to care for a low-resource socioculturally diverse urban community.

Christopher N Herndon1, Yanett Anaya2, Martha Noel3, Hakan Cakmak3, Marcelle I Cedars4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on outcomes from a university-based low-cost and low-complexity IVF program using mild stimulation approaches and simplified protocols to provide basic access to ART to a socioculturally diverse low-income urban population.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic infertility center. PATIENT(S): Sixty-five infertile couples were enrolled from a county hospital serving a low-resource largely immigrant population. INTERVENTIONS(S): Patients were nonrandomly allocated to one of four mild stimulation protocols: clomiphene/letrozole alone, two clomiphene/letrozole-based protocols involving sequential or flare addition of low-dose gonadotropins, and low-dose gonadotropins alone. Clinical fellows managed all aspects of cycle preparation, monitoring, oocyte retrieval, and embryo transfer under an attending preceptor. Retrieval was undertaken without administration of deep anesthesia, and laboratory interventions were minimized. All embryo transfers were performed at the cleavage stage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sociomedical demographics, treatment response, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. RESULT(S): From August 2010 to June 2016, 65 patients initiated 161 stimulation IVF cycles, which resulted in 107 retrievals, 91 fresh embryo transfers, and 40 frozen embryo transfer cycles. The mean age of patients was 33.3 years, and mean reported duration of infertility was 5.3 years; 33.5% (54/161) of cycles were cancelled before oocyte retrieval, with 13% due to premature ovulation. Overall, cumulative live birth rates per retrieval including subsequent use of frozen embryos was 29.0%; 44.6% (29/65) of patients enrolled in the program achieved pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S): Use of mild stimulation protocols, simplified monitoring, and minimized laboratory handling procedures enabled access to care in a low-resource socioculturally diverse infertile population.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-cost IVF; access to care; mild stimulation; simplified IVF; socioeconomic disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28874259     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Access to infertility care in a low-resource setting: bridging the gap through resident and fellow education in a New York City public hospital.

Authors:  Jennifer K Blakemore; Susan M Maxwell; Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Kara N Goldman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.

Authors:  Tia Y Brodeur; Daniel Grow; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Infertility knowledge and treatment beliefs among African American women in an urban community.

Authors:  Ashley Wiltshire; Lynae M Brayboy; Kiwita Phillips; Roland Matthews; Fengxia Yan; Desiree McCarthy-Keith
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2019-09-24

4.  See one, do one, teach one: Reimagining reproductive endocrinology and infertility training programs to expand access to care.

Authors:  Jacob P Christ; Michelle Vu; Holly Mehr; Tia Jackson-Bey; Christopher N Herndon
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-10-07

5.  Public attitudes in the United States toward insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization and the provision of infertility services to lower income patients.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Lusine Aghajanova; Evelyn Mok-Lin; Jacquelyn R Hoffman; James F Smith; Christopher N Herndon
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-09-20

6.  Provision of infertility care for the underserved in reproductive endocrinology and infertility practices associated with obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs in the United States.

Authors:  Tia Jackson-Bey; Holly Mehr; Jacqueline R Ho; Molly M Quinn; Lusine Aghajanova; Michelle Vu; Christopher N Herndon
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-11-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.